Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania
Well, I can't imagine Flacco at 34 and his last 4-5 years thinks any team is really looking at him as a 3-4 year long-term fix. He's near the twilight of his career.
Flacco is marginally better than Keenum... Denver won 6 games last year and there were 6 losses that were by a TD or less. 3 losses by a FG or fewer, one was by 4 to KC. So, I can only imagine they look at that and believe Flacco could have won 2-3 of those. Right or wrong, I'm fairly convinced that is how they view it.
None of it matters really unless they fix the OL. They have a bit of work to do before anyone should be too concerned one way or the other about what Flacco can do.
|
Losing Harris and Sanders did more harm to the Cheating Donks than Keenum did. If those 2 didn't get hurt, Denver had a really good shot at the 2nd wild card spot. I really don't see any way that Flacco plays any better than what we saw from Keesum.