Quote:
Originally Posted by DJJasonp
what I really dont get - and I'd say this about any school, not just KU.....
how the hell can you suspend a kid from playing a sport if you have zero proof that the kid is aware of a payment to a family member?
I'm not dumb, he probably knew.......but the point is, without proof of the kid's involvement/awareness, how can you suspend him?
|
NCAA decisions are more for show than anything else. There's no inherent logic, evidentiary basis or consistency to any of them. That Adidas trial was big news, though, relatively...they weren't going to let Silvio/KU slide.