Quote:
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan
That's why I'm all in on making a trade. People are correct in all the things needed to make this defense great, but we don't need that.
If we had just a decent offense and this defense, I get not making a trade, because it's probably not enough.
This offense doesn't need a ton of help. Get Houston, Berry and Sorenson back(no small feat) plus a trade and I think we could manage to be like low 20s in defense.
|
I should like to pose an interrogatory ...
We all know the defense is ass-bad (the entire NFL community knows). Thus and ergo, it stands to reason that Wally also recognizes this fact.
What we don't know is the method Wally (and crew) uses to evaluate opponents in terms of how effective our defense is anticipated to be against specific players and/or certain schemes on a particular Sunday. For example, they may view the Susanna Hoffs as an offense that can be defended well enough with the players on hand without risking further or extended injury to guys like Fiddy ... even though he might be able to perform a limited role or something. (I hope you guys see what I mean, here.)
If that's true, isn't it better to hold guys out who risk worsening their existing ouchie or, perhaps, exacerbating a problem and causing it to linger longer than it would otherwise? If, for example, Kpassaneggnogg is a great matchup against the Hoffs' right tackle, Wally might feel good about that and it's a win/win ... Kpass gets some quality work and Fiddy gets some additional rest so he's in better shape to flatten Goff ... right?
FAX