Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
Yeah, so I'd take the QB likeliest to give me as close to a consistent A level of play as possible.
It's like if you have 2 choices:
A) I either give you a million dollars or I give you nothing
B) I give you between 700,000 to 850,000 guaranteed
Any rational person takes B right?
Yes Mahomes could end up great, but he could also end up as the next Brock Osweiler. I don't get why anyone would want such a volatile QB.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
This is precisely the rationale people associate with the Hunts. Option B keeps teams competitive, fills the seats, and makes them profit. Option A wins super bowls, or gets GMs/HC's fired.
It's all about your goals.