Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
Ironically, combined with his looks, that is the trait of MOVIE STARS.
Tom Cruise is always Tom Cruise. Will Ferrell is always Will Ferrell. RDJ is always RDJ. Bruce Willis is always Bruce Willis. And all of them have bombs at least as bad is Hamm has on their resume.
I suspect that you showed your hand when you characterized a roughing up that occurred a quarter century ago and for which much of the serious charged were dropped into something more akin to a CIA black site enhanced interrogator of unspoken, possibly recent, vintage.
|
First off, John Hamm is not a "Movie Star" and there's nothing to indicate that he could carry a film on his own, regardless of the Disney flop.
Secondly, there's a big difference between being a "Movie Star" or even a "TV Star" and being a great actor. For example, Tom Selleck is a TV star but he's neither a Movie Star or great actor.
My comments have been directed at Hamm's ability to act, not to discredit him as a TV star.