Playoff Seedings
With the recent discussions about weak divisions and their winners I had a thought about season record being your first determining factor in seedings.
As in a wild card team could take spots 2-4 if they had a better record than the division winners. It seems to not be very common at all, last year the Chargers would have had the 2 seed. I think its worth a discussion though. The teams that win the division would be guaranteed a playoff spot , however only the actual two top teams would get the 1 and 2 seeds. Rewarding the tougher divisions who might have that happen while penalizing weaker divisions by requiring them to possibly play an extra playoff game by missing the chance at the bye. |
There have been rumblings of this every time we have a 8 win team with a higher seed than a 12 win team. I'd be all for it until the Chiefs get the 6th seed instead of the 3rd.
|
It'll never happen, but I think that it's the way that it should be. Frankly, I wish that they would select playoff teams solely on record. If your whole division is crappy and you can win it with an 8-8 record, I don't believe that you should be rewarded with a playoff sport or a home game over a 12-4, 11-5, 10-6, or whatever team that was in the same conference as the number 1 seed. The Chargers are a good example. They were clearly the better team than the Ravens. That game should have been in LA.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It actually hadn't in the AFC for quite awhile before that. And it was only a 1 game difference. |
For the first time since maybe Montana was QB'ing the Chiefs, I really don't care where we fall in the 1-6 slots. I don't think any team is going to want to face Mahomes in the playoffs, home or away. Just get in to the field of 6. We will be battle tested with our schedule.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.