Napa.


I think living in SF would be cool, but that apartment shit would get old really fast.

Hmmm..

Living in the redwoods would definitely be interesting. Downtown San Fran would be nice as well. I also like the unique build of the Sacramento home, but it would need a motif overhaul for sure.

I'll sayyyyyy..... Sacramento but kinda meh on the choice.

This is actually one of the bigger surprises to me so far. I didn't expect San Francisco to win.

Living in central California and visiting Northern California a lot with the mrs, I had higher hopes for some of the homes that would be available. I'm not really blown away by any of them the way I have been with some of the other locations.

This is the only one so far that I've picked the $50k.

Was going to ask if the Trash Panda came free of charge. I'm assuming not since it's California.

Probably either Napa or Sacramento, but I'm leaning 50K here. It's been crazy to see the difference of what a million bucks gets you between states.

Plus, I'm really liking these threads, but I think they are really starting to depress me as well, haha.

I live close to Crescent City. If you want to get away from society, that place would be a great choice!

From these options I think I would have to take the $50k. Carmel has a lot going for it outside the house but that house does not do it for me.

Wow, northern California is getting killed in this voting.

By the end of this extravaganza, I will have at least $1 million by voting (d) everytime, then I can move just about wherever my little heart desires.

was just in santa cruz yesterday.. not a fan of Nor. Cal in the slightest. I much prefer So. Cal

"She has to move to Rhode Island. It's the only state left."

I've spent a lot of time in the south and very little in the north, so maybe my assessment isn't fair, but I kind of agree. Plus, I spent every minute in the north part scouting out doorways to stand in during the inevitable 10.0 earthquake that was going to happen any minute.