ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fire Bob Sutton (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=310950)

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13170577)
Offense scored 30 points noob. They did their job

You should deduct 7 as the "should have been" pick turned TD shouldn't be a positive. It shouldn't be credited to Alex11 numbers but that's how it's done. I guess you have to credit someone for the pass:shake::shake::shake:IMHO

kcpasco 10-22-2017 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13171153)
You should deduct 7 as the "should have been" pick turned TD shouldn't be a positive. It shouldn't be credited to Alex11 numbers but that's how it's done. I guess you have to credit someone for the pass:shake::shake::shake:IMHO

So by that logic you need to deduct the 7 on the Brown reception against Pitt. Then Alex did enough to win that game.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13171123)
With our center and guard injured the OL are doing a decent job. 2 of them aren't starters for us!!!!!! When there are weak players on the OL the whole line suffers. They are doing a good job for what they are. I don't see Alex11 leaving on a cart, do you? Strong, NO, weak, NO

I cannot understand why Fisher has hot and cold moments but overall he earns his participation award.


C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG
Alex Smith 25/36 342 9.5 3 0 1-11 84.9 127.3

36 passes and 1 sack Hmmm yeah they suck big time...NOT

FYI these Stats are misleading, they should have a TD removed and an INT added.

What did suck was the Defense and it's performance against the pass. They did contain the run as noted above but

29/52 417 8.0 3 0 0-0 84.6 101.2


Oakland ran 73 plays vs our 59.and neither team broke 100 yards rushing.

I hate that we're the only team with injuries. "Next man up" needs to be less of a gap.

We'll learn from this. Going into year 48 we'll still be the most learned team to have a 48-year SB appearance drought.

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13170545)
I said our O-line is weak and couldn't start on other winning teams? Are saying they're strong (obviously compared to other O-lines on winning teams)?

Ahemmmm

Denver certainly would.

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/xT9DPhONuz1SpCONiM" width="480" height="480" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/xT9DPhONuz1SpCONiM">via GIPHY</a></p>

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 13171168)
So by that logic you need to deduct the 7 on the Brown reception against Pitt. Then Alex did enough to win that game.

He needs his offense to score 7 points a quarter to win, not have point miraculously gifted to him. You think Ben should get a TD pass out of that clust**** of a play?

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13171734)
Ahemmmm

Denver certainly would.

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/xT9DPhONuz1SpCONiM" width="480" height="480" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/xT9DPhONuz1SpCONiM">via GIPHY</a></p>

I still don't think the Donks are asking for our scrubs. But if they are Andy should say yes.

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13171771)
I still don't think the Donks are asking for our scrubs. But if they are Andy should say yes.

Fisher looked great compared to what they lined up.

bevischief 10-23-2017 07:07 AM

He needs a health check up. Like welcome to the retirement home. You don't need to see down field here.

carcosa 10-23-2017 09:00 AM

This should be the OFFICIAL reaction gif on the 2017 Chiefs defense:

https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/...evator_Bob.gif

Rausch 10-23-2017 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13172153)
This should be the OFFICIAL reaction gif on the 2017 Chiefs defense:

https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/...evator_Bob.gif

Fair...

CupidStunt 10-23-2017 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 13171033)
I don't get it. This defense has been borderline elite under Sutton. We've lost multiple key players and continued to be dominant. Now, all of the sudden he's forgotten how to run a defense? Something just doesn't add up.

He's not adjusting to the fact we can't get pressure with 4 men, nor is he adjusting to the fact we do NOT have the secondary to play man coverage. I will always blame the players much more, but Sutton isn't helping by scheming as if he has race cars when he actually has Renault Twizys.

Baby Lee 10-23-2017 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13172153)
This should be the OFFICIAL reaction gif on the 2017 Chiefs defense:

https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/...evator_Bob.gif

This works as well

http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vu....w529.h352.gif

TEX 10-23-2017 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 13172161)
He's not adjusting to the fact we can't get pressure with 4 men, nor is he adjusting to the fact we do NOT have the secondary to play man coverage. I will always blame the players much more, but Sutton isn't helping by scheming as if he has race cars when he actually has Renault Twizys.

:clap: ROFL Exactly this!

chiefzilla1501 10-23-2017 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 13172161)
He's not adjusting to the fact we can't get pressure with 4 men, nor is he adjusting to the fact we do NOT have the secondary to play man coverage. I will always blame the players much more, but Sutton isn't helping by scheming as if he has race cars when he actually has Renault Twizys.

Here's the thing. You have to realize that all defenses in this league are getting torched one way or the other. It's the reality of football in the fantasy football era. Pressure teams are also getting torched by quick hit check down qbs. I don't think pressure is as much of an issue as it is our terrible ball skills when the ball is floated up for grabs. I would hope that's actually fixable. If we had even average ball skills we'd be averaging a few picks per game, and then our defense looks a bit more like it has the past few years. At the same time, Sutton has to make some adjustments to figure out how we stop a smash mouth team like Pittsburgh. To his credit, in most years, we've had these few game struggles and weve adjusted. Hope he has another rabbit in the hat on this one.

carcosa 10-23-2017 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13172259)
I don't think pressure is as much of an issue as it is our terrible ball skills when the ball is floated up for grabs. I would hope that's actually fixable. If we had even average ball skills we'd be averaging a few picks per game, and then our defense looks a bit more like it has the past few years.

It's truly insane that not a single one of Carr's passes got picked off. He was basically throwing it into a forest every play and somehow missing all the trees.

WhiteWhale 10-23-2017 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 13172161)
He's not adjusting to the fact we can't get pressure with 4 men, nor is he adjusting to the fact we do NOT have the secondary to play man coverage. I will always blame the players much more, but Sutton isn't helping by scheming as if he has race cars when he actually has Renault Twizys.

Can't play man, but need to blitz more. :rolleyes:

The secondary can't cover 4 WRs' for 2 or 3 seconds with seven ****ing guys, do you think they're going to cover 4 WR's with 4 or 5 guys for 2 seconds? Unlikely my friend.

Rausch 10-23-2017 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13172259)
If we had even average ball skills we'd be averaging a few picks per game, and then our defense looks a bit more like it has the past few years. At the same time, Sutton has to make some adjustments to figure out how we stop a smash mouth team like Pittsburgh. To his credit, in most years, we've had these few game struggles and weve adjusted. Hope he has another rabbit in the hat on this one.

I get what Sutton is trying to do. Letting a high powered offense run the ball makes sense.

Shortens the game and keeps it close.

Vs. Pitt it was a great game plan. Unfortunately the Offense shat the bed.

Vs. the Raiders it made no sense. It was a bad strat.

IMO we need to go back to rushing/blitzing the passer to reset and get centered again as a defense...

O.city 10-23-2017 11:25 AM

They didn't do that va the raiders though. They took the run away but the pass cratered

GloryDayz 10-23-2017 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 13172172)

And.........

https://media.giphy.com/media/JYEEdjzlsb280/giphy.gif

MahomesMagic 10-23-2017 04:40 PM

Puzzling why you stop applying pressure to a QB with a bad back.

penbrook 10-23-2017 04:47 PM

Btw Houston was dropped into coverage 3 out of the 4 times when the Raiders were inside the 10. **** Sutton!

Baby Lee 10-23-2017 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13172153)
This should be the OFFICIAL reaction gif on the 2017 Chiefs defense:

https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/...evator_Bob.gif

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 13172172)

I guess the moral of the story is to hold tight. Pete kept his bomb-ass wife, and ended up in-house marketing for LearJet.

Maybe our fortunes will turn as well.

Maybe come January, this will be our defense

http://www.indiewire.com/wp-content/...rtheiser-2.jpg

ping2000 10-23-2017 04:58 PM

It's time.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...37b7dbcf9c.jpg

Black Bob 10-23-2017 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 13166214)
That is all.

7-2 against the Raiders and you want to fire him?

**** you

petegz28 11-05-2017 04:44 PM

3rd & 15 and you rush 3 and drop the defense back 20 yards.....

W?
T?
F?
!

RealSNR 11-05-2017 04:46 PM

I was holding off on the pitchfork mob.

Until now.

Fire this mother****er. Now.

Black Bob 11-05-2017 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 13199723)
3rd & 15 and you rush 3 and drop the defense back 20 yards.....

W?
T?
F?
!

**** you, Fire Eric Murray! He's the cause of half our blunders

GloucesterChief 11-05-2017 04:46 PM

Everyone on the the D side of the ball should be informed their jobs are on the line. We need to clear a ton of cap room this off season.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-05-2017 04:49 PM

****ing got damned pathetic. Absolutely ****ing pathetic.

GloryDayz 11-05-2017 05:02 PM

I'm down with firing Sutton.

jspchief 11-05-2017 05:21 PM

I know this bump came after that abortion inside 2 minutes from halftime, but the defense has been solid so far considering the offense they are facing.

The real crime is that Sutton takes weeks to make adjustments.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

petegz28 11-05-2017 05:24 PM

3rd & long..Houston drops in coverage

mnchiefsguy 11-05-2017 05:32 PM

No heart by this defense. Cowboys march right down the field. Defense gives back all of the gains the offense made.

Sutton needs to go. This defense is 2003 Greg Robinson bad right now. Cannot stop anyone.

petegz28 11-05-2017 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 13200375)
No heart by this defense. Cowboys march right down the field. Defense gives back all of the gains the offense made.

Sutton needs to go. This defense is 2003 Greg Robinson bad right now. Cannot stop anyone.

I'll never understand consistently, not just here and there but consistently dropping your best pass rusher into coverage, particularly on 3rd & long

mnchiefsguy 11-05-2017 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 13200534)
I'll never understand consistently, not just here and there but consistently dropping your best pass rusher into coverage, particularly on 3rd & long

I get it in the NE game. It worked....but the defense since then has been the worst in the entire NFL in 3rd and long...that should tell you something as D cord.

petegz28 11-05-2017 05:52 PM

Romo basically ripping the defense Sutton is calling

dannybcaitlyn 11-05-2017 05:53 PM

Needs to be fired immediately. **** this shit!

GloucesterChief 11-05-2017 05:56 PM

Andy won't fire Sutton. Hunt has to step up and be a hardass and do it for him.

Trent Green GOAT 11-05-2017 05:56 PM

You don't drop your best pass rusher almost every play. That's common football sense.

kcchiefsus 11-05-2017 05:57 PM

Not a single change will be made on the coaching staff, just you watch. Andy Reid is just like Gary Pinkel was at Missouri. Both refuse to fire ineffective coaches and hire unqualified coaches from their good ol' boy network when there is a vacancy.

farmerchief 11-05-2017 06:10 PM

It's probably time to move on from Sutton

Hamwallet 11-05-2017 06:11 PM

Clark needs to tell Andy he is out if he doesn’t fire Sutton. Doesn’t matter what happens because this isn’t a winning formula.

Red Dawg 11-05-2017 06:11 PM

Team has no toughness on either side of the ball. Weak players with no attitude.

All In 11-05-2017 06:12 PM

Oh well we tried...

Jimmya 11-05-2017 06:12 PM

Be nice saying it for 3 yrs... FIRE SUTTON

dannybcaitlyn 11-05-2017 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 13200775)
Not a single change will be made on the coaching staff, just you watch. Andy Reid is just like Gary Pinkel was at Missouri. Both refuse to fire ineffective coaches and hire unqualified coaches from their good ol' boy network when there is a vacancy.

Didn’t he fire a d-coordinator in Philly and put a offensive coach in his place?lol

dannybcaitlyn 11-05-2017 06:20 PM

Andy Reid fired Juan Castillo defense coordinator Eagles during the bye week 2012. Could it happen again?

mcaj22 11-05-2017 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn (Post 13201077)
Didn’t he fire a d-coordinator in Philly and put a offensive coach in his place?lol

yea I am pretty sure Andy fired now head coach of the Buffalo Bills Sean McDermott.

Probably one of Andy's biggest miss/mistake of his career.

RickObie 11-05-2017 06:32 PM

Granted I have 400 posts over 12 years so take this with a grain of salt but this is the same show. 11-5 and yay a division title and then out in the first round. I can’t do this anymore - 47 years of this shit. If we don’t fire Sutton and give me any hope of things changing for our defense why should I waste my Sundays - I’m going to have a Heart attack over this stupidity.

MMXcalibur 11-05-2017 06:38 PM

I’ve had my fill of this bullshit.
Make a change over the bye week because we all know what the status quo is going to lead to: another early playoff game exit.

lcarus 11-05-2017 06:40 PM

Should've been fired before he could get the Country Kitchen buffet discount.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 06:43 PM

Not sure what's going on. I don't understand why Acker is playing over Mitchell. I hope Hali can play more snaps toward the end of the season because it's painfully obvious how poor olb play is hurting us. This is a complete mess. We'll see. Weve adjusted out of messes before. Was interesting to see us come out today in a 3-4 front. Sutton needs to make adjustments... ASAP. And I don't understand why our front office is twiddling their thumbs... Dorsey saved our defense last year by finding Terrance Mitchell. He did that by bringing on scrap pile free agents. Where is that this year? Man I hope they figure something out over the bye week.

GloryDayz 11-05-2017 06:49 PM

I'm not sure I can understand anybody defending Sutton at this point. It's no different than defending Greg Robinson.

11Chiefs 11-05-2017 06:53 PM

Sutton is a multi season failure at making adjustments. Expecting effective adjustments is a pipe dream. Bye Sutton bye.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13201423)
I'm not sure I can understand anybody defending Sutton at this point. It's no different than defending Greg Robinson.

Sutton's defense has been solid for about 75-80% of his time in KC. Robinson's defense looked good for a few games one season. That's the difference.

I don't know that anybody at all likes what Sutton's defense looks like right now. It looks atrocious. He has to make a big adjustment. But in my book he's earned the right to at least have some time to try to fix this. It's a better option than trying to make a switch midseason.

jspchief 11-05-2017 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201469)
Sutton's defense has been solid for about 75-80% of his time in KC. Robinson's defense looked good for a few games one season. That's the difference.

I don't know that anybody at all likes what Sutton's defense looks like right now. It looks atrocious. He has to make a big adjustment. But in my book he's earned the right to at least have some time to try to fix this. It's a better option than trying to make a switch midseason.

Sutton has also had 10 times the talent to work with. Robinson made chicken shit out of chicken shit. Sutton has made chicken salad out of filet mignon.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 11Chiefs (Post 13201455)
Sutton is a multi season failure at making adjustments. Expecting effective adjustments is a pipe dream. Bye Sutton bye.

What are you talking about? The defense has been very good the past few years. Last year we struggled a little late which is understandable given all the injuries. This season is something entirely different. We're getting beat in ways we haven't before. But let's not take away the fact that this defense has been carrying us most of the Andy Reid era.

notorious 11-05-2017 07:01 PM

Sutton should be giving 95% of his paycheck to Berry.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 13201488)
Sutton has also had 10 times the talent to work with. Robinson made chicken shit out of chicken shit. Sutton has made chicken salad out of filet mignon.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

You think our talent right now without Eric Berry is filet mignon? Seriously?

And did you really say Robinson had chicken shit to work with? He was practically given a blank check to bolster his defense.

mnchiefsguy 11-05-2017 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201469)
Sutton's defense has been solid for about 75-80% of his time in KC. Robinson's defense looked good for a few games one season. That's the difference.

I don't know that anybody at all likes what Sutton's defense looks like right now. It looks atrocious. He has to make a big adjustment. But in my book he's earned the right to at least have some time to try to fix this. It's a better option than trying to make a switch midseason.

Sorry..he has used up his rope. This is the NFL and he is not getting it done.

This defense is bad. Changes need to made. Tony Romo is a better option than Sutton right now.

mnchiefsguy 11-05-2017 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201503)
You think our talent right now without Eric Berry is filet mignon? Seriously?

And did you really say Robinson had chicken shit to work with? He was practically given a blank check to bolster his defense.

Robinson was never give a blank check for defense....it was always offense first.

Robinson was also a bad coach though, so it would not have mattered how much talent you gave him.

Give Sutton five Justin Houstons and he will drop them all in coverage....

11Chiefs 11-05-2017 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201489)
What are you talking about? The defense has been very good the past few years. Last year we struggled a little late which is understandable given all the injuries. This season is something entirely different. We're getting beat in ways we haven't before. But let's not take away the fact that this defense has been carrying us most of the Andy Reid era.

Last year Sutton refused to make effective adjustments the same as we are seeing now. I’m glad our talent has been good enough to pull through in the past. It’s not happening this year.

We still have the talent but they are not performing. That’s on the coach. Either the coach is not setting the players up for success or the coach has lost the respect/influence of the players.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 11Chiefs (Post 13201542)
Last year Sutton refused to make effective adjustments the same as we are seeing now. I’m glad our talent has been good enough to pull through in the past. It’s not happening this year.

We still have the talent but they are not performing. That’s on the coach. Either the coach is not setting the players up for success or the coach has lost the respect/influence of the players.

The defense didn't struggle last year because of lack of adjustments. Our defense was effective last year and considering the lineup we limped into the playoffs with, we did ok against the Steelers. The defense has carried us for years. Our defense looks shitty this year. We haven't made effective adjustments yet and we maybe never will. But the problem this year is new to this year. Let's not create the BS narrative that this is something that's happened over multiple years.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 13201522)
Robinson was never give a blank check for defense....it was always offense first.

Robinson was also a bad coach though, so it would not have mattered how much talent you gave him.

Give Sutton five Justin Houstons and he will drop them all in coverage....

The overreaction to Houston going into coverage is so ridiculous that dates back to last year when defense wasn't the issue. That's not fireable. The defensive struggles this year are something totally different. Rushing Houston 100% of the time isn't even close to the biggest of our problems nor do I know that it necessarily solves anything.

jspchief 11-05-2017 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201489)
What are you talking about? The defense has been very good the past few years.

No it hasn't. The defense has consistently been good at stopping one thing. The pass or the run, but never both. None of this defense's success comes off of scheme. It comes from star players bailing out mediocre schemes with individual moments of brilliance.

And yes, Sutton has had incredible talent to work with. How many pro bowlers a few years ago? Six? This defense has never been good schematically or in attitude.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

mnchiefsguy 11-05-2017 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201612)
The overreaction to Houston going into coverage is so ridiculous that dates back to last year when defense wasn't the issue. That's not fireable. The defensive struggles this year are something totally different. Rushing Houston 100% of the time isn't even close to the biggest of our problems nor do I know that it necessarily solves anything.

Being last in 3rd and long, close to last in rush defense and giving up 28 points a game is completely fireable.

This defense is bad. Hell, they gave up 19 points to Trevor ****ing Semen and the Broncos.

This defense is Greg Robinson 2003 Chiefs bad right now. Dallas punted once in the second half, and it was after the game was decided.

Sutton's defenses have always been mediocre to bad against good QB's. Now the defense is just bad against everyone.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 13201615)
No it hasn't. The defense has consistently been good at stopping one thing. The pass or the run, but never both. None of this defense's success comes off of scheme. It comes from star players bailing out mediocre schemes with individual moments of brilliance.

And yes, Sutton has had incredible talent to work with. How many pro bowlers a few years ago? Six? This defense has never been good schematically or in attitude.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

You're trying to use our 2013 roster which caught lining in a bottle early in the season to prove your point?

You're seriously overestimating the talent we've had. Look at the depth charts since 2014. And consider that Berry has missed more than half of the games since 2013 and that Houston has been an injured nonfactor in most of our playoff pushes. In each year, half of our defensive starters were below average. And we have that problem this year.

Scheme covered up personnel in the past years. It's not doing the job this year. It is a problem unique to this year. That's horse shit that scheme was a problem in years past and even bigger horse shit that we've had some kind of talent boom on defense, especially when you consider that most of our star players can't stay on the field.

mnchiefsguy 11-05-2017 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201671)
You're trying to use our 2013 roster which caught lining in a bottle early in the season to prove your point?

You're seriously overestimating the talent we've had. Look at the depth charts since 2014. And consider that Berry has missed more than half of the games since 2013 and that Houston has been an injured nonfactor in most of our playoff pushes. In each year, half of our defensive starters were below average. And we have that problem this year.

Scheme covered up personnel in the past years. It's not doing the job this year. It is a problem unique to this year. That's horse shit that scheme was a problem in years past and even bigger horse shit that we've had some kind of talent boom on defense, especially when you consider that most of our star players can't stay on the field.


How you can defend Bob Sutton after the complete meltdown of this defense in the last month is incredible. This defense does not have a ton of talent, but the talent is better than the results it is producing---they should not be the worst defense in the NFL...yet here they are.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 13201625)
Being last in 3rd and long, close to last in rush defense and giving up 28 points a game is completely fireable.

This defense is bad. Hell, they gave up 19 points to Trevor ****ing Semen and the Broncos.

This defense is Greg Robinson 2003 Chiefs bad right now. Dallas punted once in the second half, and it was after the game was decided.

Sutton's defenses have always been mediocre to bad against good QB's. Now the defense is just bad against everyone.

I'm not at all defending the defensive play this year. If it continues like this and Sutton has no answers, yes, we need to seriously consider getting rid of him. This is nothing even close to GRob. GRob was fired for multiple years of incompetence. Sutton has been incompetent for a few months. And he has adjusted us out of big defensive messes in the past. I highly doubt a midseason replacement is going to completely turn this defense around. Sutton is still our best option for the big turnaround that we need. And trust me, I don't for a second think what we're doing right now is at all acceptable.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 13201687)
How you can defend Bob Sutton after the complete meltdown of this defense in the last month is incredible. This defense does not have a ton of talent, but the talent is better than the results it is producing---they should not be the worst defense in the NFL...yet here they are.

When have I defended our defensive meltdown? I'm defending the BS revisionist nonsense that this defense was bad before 2017 or that we were overflowing with talent. We've had an effective defense even with marginal talent under Sutton. This year is totally different. We have very, very big problems and scheme is a huge part of that. But that is a problem unique to this year.

Coach 11-05-2017 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201693)
I'm not at all defending the defensive play this year. If it continues like this and Sutton has no answers, yes, we need to seriously consider getting rid of him. This is nothing even close to GRob. GRob was fired for multiple years of incompetence. Sutton has been incompetent for a few months. And he has adjusted us out of big defensive messes in the past. I highly doubt a midseason replacement is going to completely turn this defense around. Sutton is still our best option for the big turnaround that we need. And trust me, I don't for a second think what we're doing right now is at all acceptable.

Well, the numbers says otherwise in terms of comparing Sutton's 2017 to Robinson's 2003 defenses. And the 2017 defense is more talented than 2003, in my opinion.

Code:

2003 Defense

Week  Opponent  Total Yards            Pass Yards        Rush Yards      Turnovers
  1      SD          232                168                  64              2
  2      PIT        380                320                  60              4
  3      HOU        316                209                107              4
  4      BAL        326                124                202              4
  5      DEN        468                292                176              1
  6      GB          440                257                183              2
  7      OAK        357                257                100              3
  8      BUF        266                133                133              7
  9      BYE                     

    TOTALS          2,785                1,760              1,025          27
      AVG              348                  220                128            3

Code:

2017 Defense

Week  Opponent  Total Yards            Pass Yards        Rush Yards      Turnovers
  1      NE          371                247                124              0
  2      PHI        406                299                107              2
  3      LAC        330                226                104              3
  4      WAS        331                220                111              1
  5      HOU        392                248                144              1
  6      PIT        439                245                194              1
  7      OAK        505                417                  88              0
  8      DEN        364                187                177              5
  9      DAL        375                244                131              0

      TOTALS        3,513                2,333              1,180            13
        AVG            390                  259                131              1


Jimmya 11-05-2017 07:51 PM

Coaches don't change, they just get recycled

"New York Jets and Bob Sutton: Awful Match
SMUSH HIGGINS
DECEMBER 9, 2008


He shouldn't be smiling; he should be crying. Sutton is awful.

In the last two games, Jets defensive coordinator Bob Sutton has been sending three or four-man rushes every play, and seven or eight coverage defenders. Nothing is ever going to be accomplished if you don't send five to seven blitzers. If they don't, the opponent's rushing game will be gaining four to five yards a carry—so will the passing game.

Teams are more conservative with their passing game, using screen and dump passes. For example, Broncos FB/RB Peyton Hillis was killing the Jets on the ground two weeks ago, and still Sutton sent the four-man rush. San Francisco QB Shaun Hill had a great passing day last week and had five seconds of time to throw and guess what...NO PASS RUSH!

ping2000 11-05-2017 07:52 PM

Cannot stop the run, cannot stop third and long. The Chiefs have sucked at these two things for a long time.

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 13201699)
Well, the numbers says otherwise in terms of comparing Sutton's 2017 to Robinson's 2003 defenses. And the 2017 defense is more talented than 2003, in my opinion.

Code:

2003 Defense

Week  Opponent  Total Yards            Pass Yards        Rush Yards      Turnovers
  1      SD          232                168                  64              2
  2      PIT        380                320                  60              4
  3      HOU        316                209                107              4
  4      BAL        326                124                202              4
  5      DEN        468                292                176              1
  6      GB          440                257                183              2
  7      OAK        357                257                100              3
  8      BUF        266                133                133              7
  9      BYE                     

    TOTALS          2,785                1,760              1,025          27
      AVG              348                  220                128            3

Code:

2017 Defense

Week  Opponent  Total Yards            Pass Yards        Rush Yards      Turnovers
  1      NE          371                247                124              0
  2      PHI        406                299                107              2
  3      LAC        330                226                104              3
  4      WAS        331                220                111              1
  5      HOU        392                248                144              1
  6      PIT        439                245                194              1
  7      OAK        505                417                  88              0
  8      DEN        364                187                177              5
  9      DAL        375                244                131              0

      TOTALS        3,513                2,333              1,180            13
        AVG            390                  259                131              1


???
Robinson's 2009 early defense was one of the top in the NFL. Are you really trying to use those 9 games as some kind of representation of Robinson's defense? Those games were a total fluke. Just like Sutton's 2013 first 9 games.

GloryDayz 11-05-2017 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201469)
Sutton's defense has been solid for about 75-80% of his time in KC. Robinson's defense looked good for a few games one season. That's the difference.

I don't know that anybody at all likes what Sutton's defense looks like right now. It looks atrocious. He has to make a big adjustment. But in my book he's earned the right to at least have some time to try to fix this. It's a better option than trying to make a switch midseason.

17,465 days since we last attended a SB and he's had weeks, enough is enough. And allowing corners and safeties to play that far off, dropping rushers in to coverage, and rushing three isn't a sign that he's going to do any fixing. He's ****ing blind or stupid. Outside of Peters there's no part of our D that's good, that's ****ing terrible.

Quit kissing his ass. Unfounded loyalty is why we're at 17,465 days man!

Coach 11-05-2017 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201710)
???
Robinson's 2009 early defense was one of the top in the NFL. Are you really trying to use those 9 games as some kind of representation of Robinson's defense? Those games were a total fluke. Just like Sutton's 2013 first 9 games.

I didn't know Robinson coached a NFL team in 2009...... :hmmm:

Look, the pudding is in the pie. This defense is as bad as 2003 is, and arguably worse in some areas.

GloryDayz 11-05-2017 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 13201496)
Sutton should be giving 95% of his paycheck to Berry.

Sutton shouldn't be getting a paycheck!

chiefzilla1501 11-05-2017 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 13201720)
I didn't know Robinson coached a NFL team in 2009...... :hmmm:

Look, the pudding is in the pie. This defense is as bad as 2003 is, and arguably worse in some areas.

2003. Typo. Think you know what I meant.

This defense is as very bad. Never said otherwise. I just didn't understand using Robinson's early 2003 defense to prove some point, given that that defense was arguably a top 10 defense at the time. That was a complete fluke. If you want to compare this defense right now to any Robinson defense beside that time frame, yeah, you definitely have a point.

petegz28 11-05-2017 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 13201612)
The overreaction to Houston going into coverage is so ridiculous that dates back to last year when defense wasn't the issue. That's not fireable. The defensive struggles this year are something totally different. Rushing Houston 100% of the time isn't even close to the biggest of our problems nor do I know that it necessarily solves anything.

Houston drops into coverage more snaps than he rushes the passer.......think about that

dannybcaitlyn 11-05-2017 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 13201705)
Coaches don't change, they just get recycled

"New York Jets and Bob Sutton: Awful Match
SMUSH HIGGINS
DECEMBER 9, 2008


He shouldn't be smiling; he should be crying. Sutton is awful.

In the last two games, Jets defensive coordinator Bob Sutton has been sending three or four-man rushes every play, and seven or eight coverage defenders. Nothing is ever going to be accomplished if you don't send five to seven blitzers. If they don't, the opponent's rushing game will be gaining four to five yards a carry—so will the passing game.

Teams are more conservative with their passing game, using screen and dump passes. For example, Broncos FB/RB Peyton Hillis was killing the Jets on the ground two weeks ago, and still Sutton sent the four-man rush. San Francisco QB Shaun Hill had a great passing day last week and had five seconds of time to throw and guess what...NO PASS RUSH!

WTF History repeating itself.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.