ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Late Night Bullshit: Where would we be with Foles? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=312362)

Titty Meat 12-15-2017 12:20 AM

Late Night Bullshit: Where would we be with Foles?
 
Alex Smith has flirted with an MVP season. Foles looked great in relief of Wentz last week.


Last year Foles looked amazing vs Indy and struggled against a good Jaguars defense.

What would this team have gone last year had they stuck with Foles I've Alex? What would their record be with Foles as the starter this year? Keep in mind this team could have signed Foles to be the starter for half the cost of Alex.

007 12-15-2017 12:35 AM

nowhere

Nickhead 12-15-2017 12:35 AM

if foles were better than alex foles would have started. foles playing for the non concussed alex was a benching to wake up smith. other than that he is there for emergency use only. hence why he is starting and not chase daniel. :D

kjwood75nro 12-15-2017 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13284654)
Alex Smith has flirted with an MVP season. Foles looked great in relief of Wentz last week.


Last year Foles looked amazing vs Indy and struggled against a good Jaguars defense.

What would this team have gone last year had they stuck with Foles I've Alex? What would their record be with Foles as the starter this year? Keep in mind this team could have signed Foles to be the starter for half the cost of Alex.

No worse than missing numerous wide-open receivers, taking a lot of gratuitous sacks, and checking down more plays than necessary.

IOW, good (and connected) enough to keep playing but not win playoff game, but not bad enough to replace.

Ming the Merciless 12-15-2017 01:43 AM

1 playoff in in 5 years?

is that the o/u?

TribalElder 12-15-2017 02:08 AM

Disappointed

eDave 12-15-2017 02:14 AM

Exactly the same.

New World Order 12-15-2017 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 13284723)
Exactly the same.

This

thegame214 12-15-2017 02:17 AM

In Kansas City

HemiEd 12-15-2017 04:24 AM

Lost me on your first line. Foles did not look amazing in the relief of Wentz, in fact the difference was dramatic. Yeah, he got the job done but he didn't look amazing.

Why Not? 12-15-2017 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 13284764)
Lost me on your first line. Foles did not look amazing in the relief of Wentz, in fact the difference was dramatic. Yeah, he got the job done but he didn't look amazing.

6-10 for 42 yards. Very Smithian

HemiEd 12-15-2017 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 13284793)
6-10 for 42 yards. Very Smithian

Yep, he didn't lose the game for them but a couple of his throws had me concerned since I had a couple thousand CP dollars on the Eagles. . :D

New World Order 12-15-2017 06:47 AM

We probably lose to NE and Houston with Foles but win the NYG and Buffalo games.

thabear04 12-15-2017 07:33 AM

Foles nearly almost lost to the jags last season.

TeaQue 12-15-2017 08:13 AM

You guys are insane if you think we would being doing anything but worse with Foles over Smith.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.