ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I think it's gonna be Barkley. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=266588)

suds79 11-13-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 9115589)
Mobility & scrambling ability are not one in the same.

Agree. Definitely a difference.

But I'd say Tom Brady is just about as immobile as it gets. He still manages.

I just don't think mobility will be an issue for Barkley.

Chiefnj2 11-13-2012 01:28 PM

Smith and Wilson are better under pressure than Barkley.

ModSocks 11-13-2012 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9115618)
Agree. Definitely a difference.

But I'd say Tom Brady is just about as immobile as it gets. He still manages.

I just don't think mobility will be an issue for Barkley.

I dont think so either. All three are young with fresh legs and can move around in the pocket. Though i think Smith really needs to work on his pocket awareness.

ModSocks 11-13-2012 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9115620)
Smith and Wilson are better under pressure than Barkley.

I disagree.

I think production under pressure is Smith's biggest concern.

Hoover 11-13-2012 01:29 PM

If Geno is there we will draft him.

ModSocks 11-13-2012 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 9115625)
If Geno is there we will draft him.

Don't be so sure. We won't know till the Senior Bowl.

Buckweath 11-13-2012 01:30 PM

1. Geno
2. Barkley
3. Wilson

alnorth 11-13-2012 01:31 PM

Barkley is surrounded by much better talent than Geno, and Geno is still out-performing Barkley. If Geno's gone, fine but if he's there, he's the easy pick over Barkley.

Chiefnj2 11-13-2012 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9115624)
I disagree.

I think production under pressure is Smith's biggest concern.

Watch the Stanford clips and even Syracuse this year. Barkley's system protects him a lot. Against Syracuse I'd say 70% of his passes were 2 yards down field or less. He makes some boneheaded plays under pressure.

DaKCMan AP 11-13-2012 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9115629)
Don't be so sure. We won't know till the Senior Bowl.

I doubt Smith plays in the senior bowl if he's projected to be a first round pick.

MIAdragon 11-13-2012 01:32 PM

http://drawception.com/pub/panels/20...KHNBhaA8-2.png

Chris Meck 11-13-2012 01:32 PM

I'd be okay with any of the three, but I think that for a franchise that hasn't taken a QB in round 1 for 30 years Barkley is the best bet.

I think his mobility is fine. He's not a statue. I think his arm strength is fine, but I really like his accuracy, decision making, and reputation as a high intangibles guy. Little chance of him 'Leafing out'. I think Matt Ryan is a good comparison.

Don't tell me you wouldn't take Matt Ryan.

suds79 11-13-2012 01:33 PM

This is a weird year for QBs for me. As long as the Chiefs get one of the 3, I'll be happy. But I feel like they're all so different.

Matt Barkley - Safest bet IMO. Seems like your standard pure pocket NFL passer. Average NFL arm. Not bad. But average.
(but has Marqise Lee to throw to)

Tyler Wilson - Tough. I think possibly strongest arm.
(Who's Tyler throwing to?)

Geno Smith - Overall highest upside skill set wise.
(but has Tavon Austin to throw to)

take your pick.

ModSocks 11-13-2012 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 9115634)
Barkley is surrounded by much better talent than Geno, and Geno is still out-performing Barkley. If Geno's gone, fine but if he's there, he's the easy pick over Barkley.

They both have a pretty damn good WR who bails them out.

It's to early for me to say who is the better QB. I'd rather wait till have all the information and see them perform in their Bowls before i give my definitive answer on who's best.

Right now, i prefer Wilson, but i don't KNOW that he's the better candidate.

Chiefnj2 11-13-2012 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9115638)
I'd be okay with any of the three, but I think that for a franchise that hasn't taken a QB in round 1 for 30 years Barkley is the best bet.

I think his mobility is fine. He's not a statue. I think his arm strength is fine, but I really like his accuracy, decision making, and reputation as a high intangibles guy. Little chance of him 'Leafing out'. I think Matt Ryan is a good comparison.

Don't tell me you wouldn't take Matt Ryan.

Why is the Matt Ryan comparison more accurate than comparing him to Sanchez or Leinert?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.