Because they don't want to sign a 37 year old with major injury concerns and 2 career playoff wins?
Posted via Mobile Device

So I guess you are betting against Houston or Denver doing well if he signs with ine if them?

So why didn't Dallas?
Posted via Mobile Device

Yes.
Posted via Mobile Device

Guess we will see.

Broncos "will sign" Romo and our 1st pick Reuben Foster will make Romo wish he signed with Houston instead:thumb:

Wasn't their defense horrible?

I'd see Houston doing better with him than Dungver. Dungver needs a lot of pieces on the offensive side of the ball to make it work for him, and they don't have the time, or the benefit of the doubt about Romo staying healthy enough to make a run. I hope he goes to Dungver, I don't think he makes them a contender. They have a new coaching staff, a defense that wasn't nearly as good last season as the SB year, and would have lots of new pieces for a fist time HC to make gel and work properly, WITHOUT Romi getting hurt. Sounds like a lot to overcome.

Yeah as Denver will likely be the spot he lands there. Unless something else comes up.

2-14 next year please

This

He can either finish first in a weak division or third in the West....thinkin Houston.

They were average most years. In 2009, they were 2nd in points and other in points. in their playoff loss that year, Romo had 3 turnovers, three 3 and outs and three 4 and outs. He also only led one drive longer than 40 yards the whole game.
Posted via Mobile Device

The dream is over.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-in-tony-romo/

Romo will play well for about 4 to 6 weeks. Then on to IR.