ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Gronk or Kelce (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=326105)

Chiefer8989 10-18-2019 03:41 PM

Gronk or Kelce
 
Two great TE's. When both were at their best, who was better? Again, this isn't about who you would rather have long term. Or necessarily about better career. Someone can have a better career yet not necessarily be better (For example Brady has had a better career than Montana. But Joe was better).

DaFace 10-18-2019 03:43 PM

When healthy, Gronk was about as good as they get. Kelce is pretty damn close, though, and he doesn't get injured near as often.

carcosa 10-18-2019 03:44 PM

**** Grink!!!;;;

lcarus 10-18-2019 03:44 PM

At their absolute best I'd take Kelce. At their absolute worst I'd take Kelce.

tyecopeland 10-18-2019 03:45 PM

Gronk was a better blocker

Dunerdr 10-18-2019 03:46 PM

Gronks career is atleast partially due to Tom Brady throwing dimes. Kelce peaked and lead the league in YAC with smith throwing down and behind him..

KCUnited 10-18-2019 03:49 PM

**** Gronk Forever

Chiefer8989 10-18-2019 03:53 PM

Dare I ask if Kelce is on the level of Tony Gonzalez in his prime? I'm sure I'll get hell for even asking.

Molitoth 10-18-2019 03:54 PM

I like Gronk, but I'd take Kelce.

Gronk was injury prone.

crispystl 10-18-2019 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefer8989 (Post 14538337)
Dare I ask if Kelce is on the level of Tony Gonzalez in his prime? I'm sure I'll get hell for even asking.

Yeah he’s in the same league for sure.
Tony had better hands, but Kelce is harder to cover and gets more YAC.

notorious 10-18-2019 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 14538324)
**** Gronk Forever

Nice!

ClevelandBronco 10-18-2019 03:57 PM

As Jeopardy contestants, I'd take the empty lecturn.

Chiefer8989 10-18-2019 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 14538340)
I like Gronk, but I'd take Kelce.

Gronk was injury prone.

But that's not the question. At their absolute peak who was better? Who would most NFL fans take for one do or die game?

Tribal Warfare 10-18-2019 04:00 PM

Gronk, and I hate saying that but he had more reliable hands, didn't have that mental lapse and drop a routine catch like Travis does.

Rob was a better blocker too

Amnorix 10-18-2019 04:03 PM

I think as receivers they're pretty darn close to equal.

But Kelce isn't anywhere near the blocker Gronk was. He was freaking outstanding. Great at it, and very willing to do it. Wham blocks inside against 300+ lb. DTs? Many times. Singled up against very good pass rushing DEs or LBs? Yep, could do that too.

That stuff doesn't show up in the stat sheet. Nor does the impact it has on your gameplan and offensive strategy. With Gronk being an elite receiver or blocker, if he was at the natural TE position, instead of flexed out, defenses had NO IDEA from that alone whether it was a pass or run. He could kill you either way. That's damn rare for a TE.

If they'd both been WRs, then you could have the debate. Since they're TEs, though, it's Gronk.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.