We aren't moving anyone. 2017 is our year. Cleve isn't tendering Napoli or Rajai Davis, who knows what happens to their starters who got hurt, etc etc. they're vulnerable for sure. I'm more worried about Det
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think you're right unless the market for relievers remains crazy. A team like the Nats with a short window may be motivated to pay big now for an established bullpen stud like Davis rather than spend 80 million on chapman or Jensen. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
BA just came out with their top 10:
1. Josh Staumont, rhp 2. Matt Strahm, lhp 3. Hunter Dozier, 3b/of 4. Eric Skoglund, lhp 5. A.J. Puckett, rhp 6. Scott Blewett, rhp 7. Chase Vallot, c 8. Ryan O’Hearn, 1b 9. Jorge Bonifacio, of 10. Kyle Zimmer, rhp Interesting that they have the 2 big lefties (Skoglund and Blewett) this high --- feels like their projecting their size and draft pedigree as much as anything. |
Quote:
Haven't read the full comments yet, but Staumont's upside is definitely the highest out of all Royals prospects. He's got a Verlander-good fastball/curve combo. Control is significantly worse, though. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There is increasing sentiment coming out of CBA negotiations that the qualifying-offer system, as we know it, is dying as of next year.</p>— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) <a href="https://twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/798242553124573184">November 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If that means no compensation for departing free agents, this will CRUSH the Royals, who'll have 4-5 guys worth offering QO's to next year. <a href="https://t.co/qZSWqo2qvl">https://t.co/qZSWqo2qvl</a></p>— Rany Jazayerli (@jazayerli) <a href="https://twitter.com/jazayerli/status/798243581106462720">November 14, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The sense I've gotten is teams that lose FAs will get recompense in some form or fashion. It's more teams that sign them won't be penalized. <a href="https://t.co/7niKDPAcC2">https://t.co/7niKDPAcC2</a></p>— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) <a href="https://twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/798244640424071168">November 14, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
More likely it seems is we will downgrade offensively and save some money, and downgrading this offense seems like a bad idea. |
Quote:
Good riddance. |
Quote:
Dude will be 34 and got his last contract. Good for him. He was great for us and that's all I care about. |
Quote:
It would have cost KC $17 million to keep Morales this year, on the qualifying offer. That's too rich for an all-bat guy. The extra year is likely what turned KC away from Morales on this deal. They can get similar or even superior hitters for the same type of AAV but fewer years. One year of Beltran at $12 million or one year of Matt Holliday at $10 million is likely to produce similar or better results as Morales, at a lower/similar cost and with less long-term risk. Quote:
This makes a lot more sense. Teams have always been compensated for players leaving as FAs. I imagine it will always exist in some form. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Bring Belly back in to DH? I heard he's getting in great shape.
|
Quote:
|
Billy will prolly only get a minor league deal with spring invite.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.