Danny Duffy traded to the Dodgers
 

:deevee:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dodgers acquiring Danny Duffy, sources tell <a href="https://twitter.com/TheAthletic?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheAthletic</a>. Agreed to trade by waiving 10-and-5 rights. First: <a href="https://twitter.com/JeffPassan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JeffPassan</a>.</p>&mdash; Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/1420862455098527748?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 29, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Awesome news!

RIP

Love Duffman, but this is absolutely the right move for the Royals.

Be curious to see what they got . . . . .

A bag of bibles

Appears the royals are sending cash as well to the dodgers. Hopefully the prospects increase with that.

For the best...

They are to be named later. It’s all based on how soon Duffy can return from injury

Should have done this 4 years ago

Didn’t they say in last nights broadcast he was due pretty soon? I don’t know. As I stated somewhere else:

1. Trade DUFFMAN to the dodgers.
2. Get a few decent prospects.
3.????????
(Resign DUFFMAN in the off-season)
4. Profit

Why is everybody on board before seeing what they get in return?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One more time: Kansas City will be getting players to be named later for from the Dodgers for Danny Duffy. They’ll have a few months to consider the ones on the list from the Dodgers and can choose from it.</p>&mdash; Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) <a href="https://twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/1420864766558580742?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 29, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I’m worried about getting fleeced by LA. At least the chiefs will take it out on their football teams.

Players to be named later?

Duffy isn’t worth much. And he’s not part of the future. So anything they can get for him is ok.