ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals John Sherman's Wife Makes Stunning Declaration on Royals/Chiefs Future (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=352972)

T-post Tom 04-06-2024 07:16 AM

John Sherman's Wife Makes Stunning Declaration on Royals/Chiefs Future
 
In comments under a public Facebook post, Marny Sherman said, "Unfortunately neither team will work with Jackson County again. The lack of leadership has lost the city two treasured assets."

STFU Not a good look for an owner’s wife imho. Didn’t realize that she was also a spokesperson for the Hunt family.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;Unfortunately neither team will work with Jackson County again,&quot; wrote the wife of Royals owner John Sherman in a Facebook comment. <a href="https://t.co/Kd5o8mCTu8">https://t.co/Kd5o8mCTu8</a></p>&mdash; KCTV5 News (@KCTV5) <a href="https://twitter.com/KCTV5/status/1776067242045718612?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 5, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


https://kckingdom.com/posts/john-she...e-01htq9p3m4b8

Spott 04-06-2024 07:19 AM

Karens ranting on social media, news at 11.

TLO 04-06-2024 07:20 AM

Wow. I really couldn't care less.

T-post Tom 04-06-2024 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 17473407)
Karens ranting on social media, news at 11.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 17473409)
Wow. I really couldn't care less.


Little different when the “Karen” is the owner’s wife. Not a good look.

RealSNR 04-06-2024 07:22 AM

https://media2.giphy.com/media/7UD0qzSSNWycg/giphy.gif

Red Dawg 04-06-2024 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 17473409)
Wow. I really couldn't care less.

Then you suck. All the no voters just don't get it.

threebag 04-06-2024 07:30 AM

Wonder if Kansas will build the two venues side by side with a shared roof?

Kman34 04-06-2024 07:34 AM

Social media has been the downfall of many stupid people…

Rainbarrel 04-06-2024 07:39 AM

Voting no made this woman's maid's life a bitch. Think before you vote

scho63 04-06-2024 07:48 AM

When a highly profitable business tries to pressure voters to subsidize them so they can make even more money and then piss on said voters when they disagree, they can go **** themselves. Go extort someone else. I'm a capitalist and that's how it goes.

The whole thing seems like each side did a shit job selling their side.

ChiliConCarnage 04-06-2024 07:53 AM

Marny's the kind of name a rich bitch has anyway. FU, Marny!

Pablo 04-06-2024 07:54 AM

Get hit by a cement truck ****

WhawhaWhat 04-06-2024 07:54 AM

Calm down with the clickbait titles.

LoneWolf 04-06-2024 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17473426)
When a highly profitable business tries to pressure voters to subsidize them so they can make even more money and then piss on said voters when they disagree, they can go **** themselves. Go extort someone else. I'm a capitalist and that's how it goes.

The whole thing seems like each side did a shit job selling their side.

Define “highly profitable.” Most of the owner’s gains are in the continued rise in the value of their franchise. The Chiefs and certainly the Royals aren’t raking in $500 million net profit per year.

ClearmontChief 04-06-2024 08:01 AM

What exactly is so stunning? Rich folk going to make money?

jjchieffan 04-06-2024 08:03 AM

I'm assuming that the problem was more that the voters just didn't want a new downtown ballpark for the Royals. Had it just been for Arrowhead renovations, then it would have passed. Which is why they bundled it together. They thought that the fear of losing the Chiefs would be enough to sway the voters to pay for the new Royals stadium. Well, that didn't work. Probably the best bet going forward is for the Royals to get their own deal in Kansas and put the Chiefs renovations up for a vote separately.

displacedinMN 04-06-2024 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 17473419)
Social media has been the downfall of many stupid people…

The internet is great because it gives people a voice
The internet is bad because is give people a voice



Some people deserve NOT to be heard.

wazu 04-06-2024 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 17473407)
Karens ranting on social media, news at 11.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 17473409)
Wow. I really couldn't care less.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat (Post 17473430)
Calm down with the clickbait titles dickhead.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClearmontChief (Post 17473433)
What exactly is so stunning? Rich folk going to make money?

**** off with these comments. This is a major piece of news regarding the number one topic in KC sports right now. This isn't some random person, it's a pretty major window into the raw opinions of key decision makers that the public usually doesn't see. It is absolutely "stunning" and yes it's worth it's own thread.

notorious 04-06-2024 08:13 AM

https://media.tenor.com/TUsI2CLI30gAAAAM/oof-meme.gif

ChiliConCarnage 04-06-2024 08:15 AM

In all seriousness, I'm sure they put a bunch of effort into it and are frustrated. Other people said it, but social media was a bad idea. There's no filter or anything preventing you from instantly putting any thought out for the world to see no matter your state of mind.

PunkinDrublic 04-06-2024 08:35 AM

Looks like Sherman needs to remind the hen who the rooster is.

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17473426)
When a highly profitable business tries to pressure voters to subsidize them so they can make even more money and then piss on said voters when they disagree, they can go **** themselves. Go extort someone else. I'm a capitalist and that's how it goes.

The whole thing seems like each side did a shit job selling their side.

Scho... It's obvious at this point that the Chiefs wanted this to fail to gain all the leverage. They will either get a big shiny new stadium in Kansas, or Jackson County will pay even more than before to keep just the Chiefs. I hate to see Arrowhead go away, and hope it doesn't, but the Chiefs intent with those mediocre to piss board plans should be an indicator that they wanted PR cover in case they take the deal in Kansas.

Kman34 04-06-2024 08:48 AM

I’m sure Mr. Sherman is very pleased that she ****ed up the leverage he had with Jackson County and the state of Kansas..

cmh6476 04-06-2024 09:13 AM

That's not a good business strategy on her part, even if the comments are true.

nychief 04-06-2024 09:24 AM

I mean... did anybody think that rejecting this would lead right back to negotiating table? That is naive. Some other county or state will step up. It's complete free agency now.

BWillie 04-06-2024 09:35 AM

I love it. Shes ride or die.

Titty Meat 04-06-2024 09:41 AM

I posted this on the stadium thread a few days before the media caught wind of it

RockChalk 04-06-2024 10:09 AM

Sounds like Marny was one too many cosmos deep and doing some facebooking.

Cooter Bailey 04-06-2024 10:13 AM

I assume many will be disappointed when the Royals move to Nashville. That’s the most likely scenario.

Rainbarrel 04-06-2024 10:17 AM

The Opera would have been so much closer

Nightfyre 04-06-2024 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooter Bailey (Post 17473532)
I assume many will be disappointed when the Royals move to Nashville. That’s the most likely scenario.

Sherman has shareholders to answer to, and I don't think Mahomes and other local shareholders are gonna sit quietly by and watch a KC franchise walk away. Maybe they move to another part of KC, but to leave the city? Seems like Sherman would have a fight on his hands to me.

Discuss Thrower 04-06-2024 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17473537)
Sherman has shareholders to answer to, and I don't think Mahomes and other local shareholders are gonna sit quietly by and watch a KC franchise walk away. Maybe they move to another part of KC, but to leave the city? Seems like Sherman would have a fight on his hands to me.

Team moves to a better market and sells for $1.5 billion or more?

Who wouldn't take a 7-10% return on an investment?

Nightfyre 04-06-2024 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 17473552)
Team moves to a better market and sells for $1.5 billion or more?

Who wouldn't take a 7-10% return on an investment?

I don't think you pick the baseball franchise for the ROI alone. There are many more liquid options to invest in that can provide a similar return.

Cooter Bailey 04-06-2024 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17473537)
Sherman has shareholders to answer to, and I don't think Mahomes and other local shareholders are gonna sit quietly by and watch a KC franchise walk away. Maybe they move to another part of KC, but to leave the city? Seems like Sherman would have a fight on his hands to me.

I have a friend that is a Kansas State Senator. He tells me that Kansas would be interested in the Chiefs but maybe not so much with the Royals. He is the one that told me about Nashville.

WhawhaWhat 04-06-2024 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooter Bailey (Post 17473558)
I have a friend that is a Kansas State Senator. He tells me that Kansas would be interested in the Chiefs but maybe not so much with the Royals. He is the one that told me about Nashville.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/EouEz...=200w.gif&ct=g

loochy 04-06-2024 10:39 AM

Oh no! They might move to another county! THE HORROR!11!!

How am I supposed to drive that far?

neech 04-06-2024 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 17473571)
Oh no! They might move to another county! THE HORROR!11!!

How am I supposed to drive that far?

I heard Belize was nice, I could do that.

DaFace 04-06-2024 10:42 AM

I mean, you can hate her for being a bitch, but a lot of us have been saying this ever since the votes were tallied.

neech 04-06-2024 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooter Bailey (Post 17473558)
I have a friend that is a Kansas State Senator. He tells me that Kansas would be interested in the Chiefs but maybe not so much with the Royals. He is the one that told me about Nashville.

https://media1.giphy.com/media/jH6s9...I73r/giphy.gif

Woogieman 04-06-2024 10:44 AM

Downtown KC is the only correct answer. Both sides need to get over themselves, act professionally, and get it done. It will help greatly if Frank White is recalled, between the property taxes and the Stadium process, he has proven to be as talented as the night manager of a Minit Mart

Skyy God 04-06-2024 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClearmontChief (Post 17473433)
What exactly is so stunning? Rich folk going to make money?

Plutocrats whining that the taxpayers won’t shovel more wealth upward is a bad look.

Well past time for pitchforks and torches.

kcclone 04-06-2024 10:46 AM

No one ever needs to hear from the “spouse”. That’s just not a good look.

But with that said, I think Jackson County made a lot of mistakes in this process.

Jackson County just ran off two of few remaining community assets they had.

BWillie 04-06-2024 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17473537)
Sherman has shareholders to answer to, and I don't think Mahomes and other local shareholders are gonna sit quietly by and watch a KC franchise walk away. Maybe they move to another part of KC, but to leave the city? Seems like Sherman would have a fight on his hands to me.

Mahomes owns 1% or less lf the Royals....he has almost no say in what they do...and he actually might want them to move to Texas. Since hes from there

Skyy God 04-06-2024 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neech (Post 17473574)

KS regulators get paid like $10K a year..

People know people. I used to be acquaintances with a former speaker.

loochy 04-06-2024 10:50 AM

Bitch all you want, but the people spoke loud and clear

Cooter Bailey 04-06-2024 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat (Post 17473569)

Doubt me if you want to but it’s absolutely true. He had more to say but I will just keep it to myself. 😂

ClearmontChief 04-06-2024 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 17473443)
**** off with these comments. This is a major piece of news regarding the number one topic in KC sports right now. This isn't some random person, it's a pretty major window into the raw opinions of key decision makers that the public usually doesn't see. It is absolutely "stunning" and yes it's worth it's own thread.

You obviously missed my point! It is certainly not stunning that a billionaire’s wife is complaining about the peasants not forking over more. Then, when they stood their ground, a huffy “fine! We’ll take our toys to another playground!”

You think that’s stunning? I think it’s F’n typical!

BWillie 04-06-2024 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 17473582)
Bitch all you want, but the people spoke loud and clear

When KC Tenants and 65 year old white guys afraid of downtowns come together for the greater good

Titty Meat 04-06-2024 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooter Bailey (Post 17473532)
I assume many will be disappointed when the Royals move to Nashville. That’s the most likely scenario.

No it's not

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 12:01 PM

Maybe billionaires shouldn't beg for money then

Woogieman 04-06-2024 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17473633)
Maybe billionaires shouldn't beg for money then

Your post might have a little credibility if Sherman hadn't committed to forking over $1 billion for the new stadium...not exactly on the street corner with a tin cup

Skyy God 04-06-2024 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17473641)
Your post might have a little credibility if Sherman hadn't committed to forking over $1 billion for the new stadium...not exactly on the street corner with a tin cup

He and his ownership group want to finance a bil in order to get, what, probably $800M plus in public revenue. Great ROI on someone else’s money.

Do you even capitalism, bro??

Pepe Silvia 04-06-2024 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 17473413)
Then you suck. All the no voters just don't get it.

There was no winning the vote, you just don't get it. The Hunts/Shermans wanted it to fail. They want to leave.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-06-2024 12:29 PM

CP is failing , we could have rigged that poll and got a new stadium!

Woogieman 04-06-2024 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyy God (Post 17473645)
He and his ownership group want to finance a bil in order to get, what, probably $800M plus in public revenue. Great ROI on someone else’s money.

Do you even capitalism, bro??

Yes I do, bro, and like you say a "great ROI". Yay capitalism! If KCians vioted down every public-private partnership project, donwtown woulld stilll be a ghost town, our airport would still be on par with Dwight D. Eiesenhower airport, and both the Chiefs and Rs would have already left because they couldn't make improvements decades ago when it was originally passed. I guess it all depends on what kind of city you want to live in.

Do you even work, bro?

wazu 04-06-2024 12:47 PM

Didn't see the full text of her comments in the OP article. The indictment of Frank White hits pretty hard. I actually somewhat empathize with her frustration. Frank White is petty as ****, and has a massive conflict of interest with this whole process. He is like a super villain now, obtaining public office to use government as a weapon against his former employer. Sounds like Lucas was in there dicking around as well with the plans. I think the Royals misplayed this, but some of that I think is them trying to navigate a very difficult group of KC leaders.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The owner of the Kansas City Royals’ wife. <br><br>Oof. <br><br>This might get ugly. <a href="https://t.co/OZFWHkqnhl">pic.twitter.com/OZFWHkqnhl</a></p>&mdash; Josh Chavis (@JoshChavis65) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoshChavis65/status/1776044650459017355?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 5, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Skyy God 04-06-2024 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17473665)
Yes I do, bro, and like you say a "great ROI". Yay capitalism! If KCians vioted down every public-private partnership project, donwtown woulld stilll be a ghost town, our airport would still be on par with Dwight D. Eiesenhower airport, and both the Chiefs and Rs would have already left because they couldn't make improvements decades ago when it was originally passed. I guess it all depends on what kind of city you want to live in.

Do you even work, bro?

Those are legit projects.

Stadiums are an economic ripoff for cities. The plutocrats behind stadium scams vastly inflate revenue projections and intentionally understate annual maintenance costs.

But ignore empirical evidence like a dumb ****ing sheep if that helps you sleep at night.

Oh, and I have a finance degree and worked in the industry prior to grad school.

nychief 04-06-2024 01:04 PM

Parking and free refills are the issues that move voters in the 816.

Katipan 04-06-2024 01:06 PM

It takes 13 blocks of parking to facilitate Coors.

I dunno guys.
Its alot of necessary space.

But.
Downtown is packed even with a shit show on the field. That's what a Downtown stadium does.

ChiefsCountry 04-06-2024 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katipan (Post 17473679)
It takes 13 blocks of parking to facilitate Coors.

I dunno guys.
Its alot of necessary space.

But.
Downtown is packed even with a shit show on the field. That's what a Downtown stadium does.

Downtown St. Louis today has a Cardinals game, Battlehawks UFL game, and St. Louis City MLS game.

Skyy God 04-06-2024 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 17473697)
Downtown St. Louis today has a Cardinals game, Battlehawks UFL game, and St. Louis City MLS game.

Downtown StL is one step up from Escape from NY.

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyy God (Post 17473673)
Those are legit projects.

Stadiums are an economic ripoff for cities. The plutocrats behind the stadium scam vastly inflate revenue projections and intentionally understate annual maintenance costs.

But ignore empirical data evidence like a dumb ****ing sheep if that helps you sleep at night.

Oh, and I have a finance degree and worked in the industry.

All may be true, but it also true that other areas/cities are more than ready to step up to the plate. So it's a decision for the citizens. Do you want to live in a city without baseball?

Woogieman 04-06-2024 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyy God (Post 17473673)
Those are legit projects.

Stadiums are an economic ripoff for cities. The plutocrats behind the stadium scam vastly inflate revenue projections and intentionally understate annual maintenance costs.

But ignore empirical data evidence like a dumb ****ing sheep if that helps you sleep at night.

Oh, and I have a finance degree and worked in the industry.

Appeal to authority fallacies are terrible, especially when you are debating someone with a few semesters of Finance in Grad School that has developed real estate ; )

Skyy God 04-06-2024 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17473722)
Appeal to authority fallacies are terrible, especially when you are debating someone with a few semesters of Finance in Grad School that has developed real estate ; )

So you got nothing.

Figures.

FloridaMan88 04-06-2024 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyy God (Post 17473673)
Those are legit projects.

Stadiums are an economic ripoff for cities. The plutocrats behind the stadium scam vastly inflate revenue projections and intentionally understate annual maintenance costs.

But ignore empirical data evidence like a dumb ****ing sheep if that helps you sleep at night.

Oh, and I have a finance degree and worked in the industry.

Not The Battery in Atlanta which is a mixed-use development as part of the Braves new stadium.

Taxable property values in the area have risen from $5 million to $736 million during the past decade.

$38 million in tax revenue generated for the county/city/state.

The development has attracted major business ventures such as Papa John’s global HQ relocating to be in the development.

You are against that type of economic development/impact?

Bearcat 04-06-2024 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17473714)
All may be true, but it also true that other areas/cities are more than ready to step up to the plate. So it's a decision for the citizens. Do you want to live in a city without baseball?

Yeah, sometimes you have to rise above your own principles and figure out if it's really what you want... billionaires will keep being billionaires, but is it worth $140/year to have a football team in town while driving around those unrepaired potholes. :shrug:

Woogieman 04-06-2024 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyy God (Post 17473724)
So you got nothing.

Figures.

Nothing you'd understand, anyway. If you think the Street Car and P&L projects are legit (KC has picked up $160mm of the P&L tab, and the Street Car has no revenue and maintenance has already blown out original figures) but the stadiums "are not" legit because you don't like baseball, then there is nothing more to discuss.

Discuss Thrower 04-06-2024 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 17473726)
Not The Battery in Atlanta which is a mixed-use development as part of the Braves new stadium.

Taxable property values in the area have risen from $5 million to $736 million during the past decade.

$38 million in tax revenue generated for the county/city/state.

The development has attracted major business ventures such as Papa John’s global HQ relocating to be in the development.

You are against that type of economic development/impact?


Godspeed using the Battery as a positive example given its controversial choice of location.

FloridaMan88 04-06-2024 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 17473733)
Godspeed using the Battery as a positive example given its controversial choice of location.

Only controversial if you are myopically pro-downtown baseball.

They went to a suburban area of Atlanta more conveniently located for their fanbase.

Smed1065 04-06-2024 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 17473734)
Only controversial if you are myopically pro-downtown baseball.

They went to a suburban area of Atlanta more conveniently located for their fanbase.

That and the old one was located in about the same as Raytown......Just crack instead meth.

Woogieman 04-06-2024 02:40 PM

TSC is not located in Raytown or in the Raytown School District...carry on

vonBobo 04-06-2024 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 17473668)
Didn't see the full text of her comments in the OP article. The indictment of Frank White hits pretty hard. I actually somewhat empathize with her frustration. Frank White is petty as ****, and has a massive conflict of interest with this whole process. He is like a super villain now, obtaining public office to use government as a weapon against his former employer. Sounds like Lucas was in there dicking around as well with the plans. I think the Royals misplayed this, but some of that I think is them trying to navigate a very difficult group of KC leaders.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The owner of the Kansas City Royals’ wife. <br><br>Oof. <br><br>This might get ugly. <a href="https://t.co/OZFWHkqnhl">pic.twitter.com/OZFWHkqnhl</a></p>&mdash; Josh Chavis (@JoshChavis65) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoshChavis65/status/1776044650459017355?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 5, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This message went out on purpose. The teams are playing the victim role while belittling leadership and the voters. It doesn't look good for the headline to read "teams file divorce from loving fans, will remarry highest bidder".

Ok' Marny spells the whole thing out.. The Royals were always leaving K, they leveraged the chiefs success to get a deal that the city leadership does not like and didn't want to go to vote. I'm guessing Marny is right now in the back of her jet, headed to a game and then dinner in someone's 100th floor penthouse suite. It must be embarrassing to have to drive guests through KCMO for a game.

FloridaMan88 04-06-2024 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smed1065 (Post 17473736)
That and the old one was located in about the same as Raytown......Just crack instead meth.

And it was impossible to get to with Atlanta’s bad traffic.

If the Braves can leave Fulton County, there is no reason the Royals couldn’t similarly leave Jackson County for a suburban location.

The main barrier appears to be imagination and initiative from Sherman.

Truist Park (the Braves new stadium) was a public/private finance deal between the team and Cobb County, but the surrounding mixed use development was mostly initiated by the team with a $400 million initial investment.

And they helped secure hotels, residential development, business develop, etc. They worked with Live Nation to redevelop a concert venue nearby.

They also partnered with Comcast and Papa John’s to bring their Southeast regional HQ and global HQ respectively to the development.

KCUnited 04-06-2024 02:51 PM

The Crossroads location was going to be a tough pass even with the Royals "answering all the questions" (which the Crossroads Association claims they did enough to enter into an agreement with them) so this whole coming back to the table with a better plan still seems like a loser especially with the bad taste in both sides mouth

If I were a JaCo resident I'd be a little put off by the Chiefs forcing me to choose between the Crossroads and Arrowhead with their plan that did nothing for the fans

And KC schools are always going to suck, so are the roads, its a ****ing city

scho63 04-06-2024 03:02 PM

The BEST solution to this whole thing:

1. The Royals get a new boutique stadium downtown. 37,500-40,000 max attendence. Needs some type of public transit option such as light rail.

2. The Chiefs get some improvements to stadium and rearrange the parking for better access.

3. Build a concert facility further away from Arrowhead that shares the parking lot. This way it becomes the Truman Sports and Entertainment Complex.

4. Allow a few hotels to be built there as well.

5. During summer they can do car shows, carnivals, flea markets and plenty of other events during summer months when there is no football to maximize the property.

Any downside to this?

ChiefsCountry 04-06-2024 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17473755)
The BEST solution to this whole thing:

1. The Royals get a new boutique stadium downtown. 37,500-40,000 max attendence. Needs some type of public transit option such as light rail.

2. The Chiefs get some improvements to stadium and rearrange the parking for better access.

3. Build a concert facility further away from Arrowhead that shares the parking lot. This way it becomes the Truman Sports and Entertainment Complex.

4. Allow a few hotels to be built there as well.

5. During summer they can do car shows, carnivals, flea markets and plenty of other events during summer months when there is no football to maximize the property.

Any downside to this?

Truman Sports Complex is still in a shit location.

Woogieman 04-06-2024 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17473755)
The BEST solution to this whole thing:

1. The Royals get a new boutique stadium downtown. 37,500-40,000 max attendence. Needs some type of public transit option such as light rail.

2. The Chiefs get some improvements to stadium and rearrange the parking for better access.

3. Build a concert facility further away from Arrowhead that shares the parking lot. This way it becomes the Truman Sports and Entertainment Complex.

4. Allow a few hotels to be built there as well.

5. During summer they can do car shows, carnivals, flea markets and plenty of other events during summer months when there is no football to maximize the property.

Any downside to this?

Only one...include a sports book to one of the hotels, hell, throw in a few craps tables if they want!

KCUnited 04-06-2024 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17473761)
Only one...include a sports book to one of the hotels, hell, throw in a few craps tables if they want!

Put it in the stadium like BetMGM and State Farm

Woogieman 04-06-2024 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 17473760)
Truman Sports Complex is still in a shit location.

Yes, but so is every casino in town when they were built. The casinos didn't give those areas a facelift, but people still come and definitely attend concerts and shows there.

Woogieman 04-06-2024 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 17473764)
Put it in the stadium like BetMGM and State Farm

TBH, I wonder if they would get any action, since if sports betting is legal, would people just use their phones?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.