Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13520900)

Using a combination of the pick from Peters and either this years 2 or 3.

Either combination would get us into the late first early second.

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13520941)

Some aren't living in the real world concerning that making a very public trade will be expensive.

I'm shelling out nightmare scenarios, but people are acting like 3 year olds not understanding that the other team is out to **** us over too.

the trade chart is BS, when other teams are inflating the price because of a bidding war for player(s)

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13520955)

You do realize that doesn't matter, they just won the SB as it stands

Originally Posted by Rudy tossed tigger's salad (Post 13520164)

Giving up assets to replace a player we had on the cheap. Clown franchise.

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13520988)

And KC isn’t trading Tyreek Hill. That’s the dumbest ****ing thing anyone has said on this forum. Stop

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13520906)

Yep.

While Mahomes will possibly make the OL look better than Alex did, no way anyone can deny they've never figured out the LG position and Witz is not the answer at all.

I don't think they gotta shift up in the draft to fill it, but hard to fill that need if they trade off half of the picks and spend it all on corners.

Moving up a but to land a starting corner and nabbing a 2nd one somewhere Day 3 is definitely realistic.


When they are trading off a future choice to fall back under the standard pick count threshold, what else would you call it?

Losing the actual net gain from the Peters trade to move up for his replacement would net them a 6th for 4th swap for an All-pro corner.

That would be like pissing on an electric fence because Frank said you were a pussy and wouldn't do it. You did it and by golly did it hurt, so your solution for burning dick is to numb it up some by sticking it in the waffle iron. Sure it goes numb and the pain subsides and Frank thinks you're cool as ****, but now your dick looks like a mangled burnt breadstick.

Originally Posted by rydogg58 (Post 13520720)

Soo...maybe I am out of the loop, but where has this been said by any credible source? I just don't understand how that makes any sense at all.

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13520609)

here's the punch in the gut scenario: Veach maybe contemplating trading Tyreek.

If you're attempting to figure how to maintain the draft capital, with the current value of the Chiefs players.

It would suck, but one could argue that KC has enough talent to succeed in Offense to trade for an upgrade for the Defense.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13521039)

Dude come on

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13521017)

Losing Peters is a sunk cost.

If we aren’t going to have him this year using the picks we got from him to help this years team isn’t stealing from the future. It’s utilizung currency as it’s earned.

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13520598)

They need to add 3 corners in this draft

2 need to have starting ability

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13520609)

here's the punch in the gut scenario: Veach maybe contemplating trading Tyreek.

If you're attempting to figure how to maintain the draft capital, with the current value of the Chiefs players.

It would suck, but one could argue that KC has enough talent to succeed in Offense to trade for an upgrade for the Defense.