ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Hall of Classics (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   So I was kicked out of my own fantasy entity ... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=295597)

TimBone 10-25-2015 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Li'l Smokey (Post 11836514)
It says Hootie is online.

If what Rudy posted earlier was all that happened between Hootie and CC, then I don't think Hootie should have been banned. I might have missed something though. I stopped checking the fanduel forum for the most part except for GameDays, because of how things were playing out.

Saul Good 10-25-2015 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 11836516)
You wanted lineups posted so you and others could judge them. You aren't entitled to that and there is no reason to discuss lineups here.

True, but it makes things a lot more interesting if you do. The truth is that it will only happen if the CP lineups are better than hootie's. If the are, someone will post them. If they don't get posted, it's safe to assume hootie's were better.

GloryDayz 10-25-2015 08:33 PM

Good think Hootie isn't Milton.....

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iM64JUSYmJ...azy+milton.jpg

KC native 10-25-2015 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836529)
True, but it makes things a lot more interesting if you do. The truth is that it will only happen if the CP lineups are better than hootie's. If the are, someone will post them. If they don't get posted, it's safe to assume hootie's were better.

The way this was supposed to work was to go in and systematically set up lineups with different players just like the pro players who enter 100-200 entries in the big tourneys. Hootie completely eschewed that approach for a favored group of core players which completely ignored the diversification element in it. His line ups weren't terrible but he wasn't playing like he had proposed when we started the group.

Lex Luthor 10-25-2015 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836529)
If they don't get posted, it's safe to assume hootie's were better.

That is a load of horseshit.

KC native 10-25-2015 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 11836528)
If what Rudy posted earlier was all that happened between Hootie and CC, then I don't think Hootie should have been banned. I might have missed something though. I stopped checking the fanduel forum for the most part except for GameDays, because of how things were playing out.

Hootie shit all over Flopnuts. He said some awful shit to him when Floppy was the only mod who was cool with his return. Hootie got banned because he burned his last bridge with the mod team. Hootie wasn't banned for his shit with crazy coffey.

TimBone 10-25-2015 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11836544)
Hootie shit all over Flopnuts. He said some awful shit to him when Floppy was the only mod who was cool with his return. Hootie got banned because he burned his last bridge with the mod team. Hootie wasn't banned for his shit with crazy coffey.

See, I didn't read any of that. Anyways, I said in the fanduel forum that I was going to stop posting fanduel drama here, and then I got sucked in again. I'm gonna bow out of this thread.

Saul Good 10-25-2015 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11836537)
The way this was supposed to work was to go in and systematically set up lineups with different players just like the pro players who enter 100-200 entries in the big tourneys. Hootie completely eschewed that approach for a favored group of core players which completely ignored the diversification element in it. His line ups weren't terrible but he wasn't playing like he had proposed when we started the group.

I'm not saying it would make hootie right. He's not. But it would still be interesting to see.


And yes...it's safe to assume that the lineup will get posted if CP's is better.

Lex Luthor 10-25-2015 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836556)
I'm not saying it would make hootie right. He's not. But it would still be interesting to see.


And yes...it's safe to assume that the lineup will get posted if CP's is better.

You're spouting off about this, but the problem is that you have no ****ing idea what you're talking about. There isn't one lineup to be posted. Nor are there two, or three, or four. There were 100 lineups for this weekend that Hootie was in the process of creating ALL ON HIS OWN when BRC got sick of his control-freak bullshit (and probably his other bullshit) and pulled the plug on him.

If you want to see the hundreds of lineups from the past few weeks, you're going to be disappointed, because I doubt anyone who has access to the Fanduel account will have either the time or the inclination to take the trouble to get them just to satisfy your curiosity. Even if someone wanted to do that, there'd be a hell of a lot of work involved to identify the lineups Hootie created and compare them to the lineups OnTheWarPath and others wanted to create but were shot down by Hootie.

You can try to play judge and jury all you want, but the fact is nobody has asked you to do that, and nobody gives a shit what you think about whose lineups may have been better.

Lex Luthor 10-25-2015 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11836544)
Hootie shit all over Flopnuts. He said some awful shit to him when Floppy was the only mod who was cool with his return. Hootie got banned because he burned his last bridge with the mod team. Hootie wasn't banned for his shit with crazy coffey.

This.

Lex Luthor 10-25-2015 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 11836531)
Good think Hootie isn't Milton.....

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iM64JUSYmJ...azy+milton.jpg

I couldn't agree more. I'm actually kind of glad I don't know Hootie in real life. He has been banned again from Chiefsplanet, and there's no telling what a crazy obsessed mother****er like that would do.

Nzoner 10-25-2015 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836556)
I'm not saying it would make hootie right. He's not. But it would still be interesting to see.


And yes...it's safe to assume that the lineup will get posted if CP's is better.

I just checked and what's really amusing is that one of the Alex Smith line-ups won $80 and was in the top 10 of 188 from week 1.

Smith
D Freeman
L Bell
T benjamin
J Edleman
J Maclin
A gates
S Gostowski
Packers

Ming the Merciless 10-25-2015 08:59 PM

I personally don't like Hootie.

But, I am consistent... So I wish to express my dislike of bans.

Free Hootie. Free clay. Free guardian.

KC native 10-25-2015 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 11836615)
I personally don't like Hootie.

But, I am consistent... So I wish to express my dislike of bans.

Free Hootie. Free clay. Free guardian.

Clay shouldn't have been banned.

Hootie got what he deserved.

I didn't know the reerunian was banned. What did he do?

TimBone 10-25-2015 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 11836615)
I personally don't like Hootie.

But, I am consistent... So I wish to express my dislike of bans.

Free Hootie. Free clay. Free guardian.

I don't know who that last guy is, but did Cosmo get banned as well?

Nzoner 10-25-2015 09:06 PM

Oh and fwiw the following is a post from Hootie in the Fanduel thread in Casino Planet that all can see along with other tidbits if you so desire.

Quote:

Seattle is a different team at home. They HAVE to win. And they dominate on secondary ... and Cam has nobody to throw it to. Is Ted Ginn going to humiliate Sherman? Seahawks are going to be #1 defense this week I'll bet my bottom dollar.
I'm not looking it up but as I recall he placed Seattle's D in at least 75% of all line-ups.

Personally,I like the moxie making a bold prediction like that BUT to put Seattle in that many line-ups with that much cash on the line was D-U-M-B

Pasta Little Brioni 10-25-2015 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 11833301)
I can't believe that a group of people that actually watch him play every week would ever consider him as an option. No matter the matchup or his price tag, or any of that shit. You can't trust Smiff in any regard. He will fail you. He will lose you money. He was born to lose.

In pure hilarity, the guy that won the million in week one had Smiff ROFL

BigRedChief 10-25-2015 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 11836632)
Oh and fwiw the following is a post from Hootie in the Fanduel thread in Casino Planet that all can see along with other tidbits if you so desire.



I'm not looking it up but as I recall he placed Seattle's D in at least 75% of all line-ups.

Personally,I like the moxie making a bold prediction like that BUT to put Seattle in that many line-ups with that much cash on the line was D-U-M-B

AND he was told that was a mistake. These other defenses would be better with data to back it up and they were ignored.

The arrogance and inability to work with ANYONE got him removed from making lineups.

notorious 10-25-2015 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11836643)
In pure hilarity, the guy that won the million in week one had Smiff ROFL

Did you get sucked into the Hootie abyss?

Saul Good 10-25-2015 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 11836646)
AND he was told that was a mistake. These other defenses would be better with data to back it up and they were ignored.

The arrogance and inability to work with ANYONE got him removed from making lineups.

This is the biggest circle jerk in history. Not one person has said he was right. He was wrong. But he got banned for something outside the message board, and that's stupid.

Its like banning sully if he had an affair because his wife is also a member.

Nzoner 10-25-2015 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836653)
This is the biggest circle jerk in history. Not one person has said he was right. He was wrong. But he got banned for something outside the message board, and that's stupid.

Its like banning sully if he had an affair because his wife is also a member.

btw i posted a line-up above for you

Ming the Merciless 10-25-2015 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 11836625)
I don't know who that last guy is, but did Cosmo get banned as well?

No clue...but regardless.. I'm against bans that don't involve a clear, direct TOS violation....like personal threats etc

NewChief 10-25-2015 09:20 PM

Everytime I step in this thread, I just keep hearing the lines "bitch, you knew I was a snake" from the shaman's parable in Natural Born Killers.

lewdog 10-25-2015 09:20 PM

Not even joking, but I am gonna miss Hootie in the Royals threads for the World Series.

Saul Good 10-25-2015 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 11836654)
btw i posted a line-up above for you

I saw that. Thanks for posting one of the profitable ones and proving my point.

Saul Good 10-25-2015 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief (Post 11836662)
Everytime I step in this thread, I just keep hearing the lines "bitch, you knew I was a snake" from the shaman's parable in Natural Born Killers.

Scorpion and the frog.

George Liquor 10-25-2015 09:30 PM

It's 10:30 on a Sunday night and Hootie is still a bundle of sticks

Swanman 10-25-2015 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836653)
This is the biggest circle jerk in history. Not one person has said he was right. He was wrong. But he got banned for something outside the message board, and that's stupid.

Its like banning sully if he had an affair because his wife is also a member.

He was banned for going completely insane on a private forum of a message board. He wasn't banned for what he did with FanDuel. He got banned for acting like a petulant child on a 9-day meth binge while suffering from split personalities when called out on his BS. He could have just discussed everything in the thread but instead he went full-on Hootie and got himself booted. Couldn't happen to a nicer gambling degenerate.

Kidd Lex 10-25-2015 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11836663)
Not even joking, but I am gonna miss Hootie in the Royals threads for the World Series.

Pretty much sums up my take. I don't always agree with him, but damn it's going to suck not having his often unique perspectives on the WS and offseason.

Prison Bitch 10-25-2015 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 11836632)
Oh and fwiw the following is a post from Hootie in the Fanduel thread in Casino Planet that all can see along with other tidbits if you so desire.



I'm not looking it up but as I recall he placed Seattle's D in at least 75% of all line-ups.

Personally,I like the moxie making a bold prediction like that BUT to put Seattle in that many line-ups with that much cash on the line was D-U-M-B

Lemme guess: after Cam shredded Seattle, our resident expert pulled his patented "Hootie double-down" and explained how he was actually right in his assessment.

Saul Good 10-25-2015 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swanman (Post 11836685)
He was banned for going completely insane on a private forum of a message board. He wasn't banned for what he did with FanDuel. He got banned for acting like a petulant child on a 9-day meth binge while suffering from split personalities when called out on his BS. He could have just discussed everything in the thread but instead he went full-on Hootie and got himself booted. Couldn't happen to a nicer gambling degenerate.

A private forum isn't really this message board.

GloryDayz 10-25-2015 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11836663)
Not even joking, but I am gonna miss Hootie in the Royals threads for the World Series.

We down to two now?

MAYHEM 10-25-2015 09:37 PM

That you guys trusted him to control the majority of the $5000 to gamble with is really on y'all, and is also the best part. :)

That and thinking Alex smith in 10% of the lineups was solid strategy- "you know... spreadsheets and all show the bears suck at defending QB's"...forget the fact that you guys actually watch the guy play and watch the coach call shit play after shitty play. Everyone of us here knows that if the cheifs were down 7 with 4 minutes to go, Andy and Alex would still try to orchestrate an 8 minute drive. How was playing the bears going to change that stupidity?

Hootie should not be banned, this was awesome to follow and better than anyone watching from the sidelines could've hoped for. Keep up the good work, Hootie...

DaneMcCloud 10-25-2015 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11833961)
I'm not defending hootie.

LMAO

You defend Hootie with every opportunity to defend Hootie. You've defended him in more than a dozen posts in this thread alone.

You defended him against Phobia, you've defended him against other members (including me) and I'm sure you'll continue to defend him in the future.

I've got no dog in this hunt and nothing that's been posted is in any way a surprise, nor is it a surprise that you've rushed to White Knight Hootie.

Cue the defense of "Saul" of himself.

Prison Bitch 10-25-2015 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11836712)
LMAO

You defend Hootie with every opportunity to defend Hootie. You've defended him in more than a dozen posts in this thread alone.

You defended him against Phobia, you've defended him against other members (including me) and I'm sure you'll continue to defend him in the future.

I've got no dog in this hunt and nothing that's been posted is in any way a surprise, nor is it a surprise that you've rushed to White Knight Hootie.

Cue the defense of "Saul" of himself.


I was about to make the identical observation, but it's so self-evident it barely needed saying.

Strongside 10-25-2015 09:47 PM

This is hilarious. So glad I left that thing alone. I was about to hit send on PayPal when something told me that it was a bad idea. Hooray for gut instinct.

Eleazar 10-25-2015 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 11836729)
This is hilarious. So glad I left that thing alone. I was about to hit send on PayPal when something told me that it was a bad idea. Hooray for gut instinct.

I think you mean "common sense" when a group that can't even agree on who is going to put the lineups in thinks they are going to be able to outsmart all the professionals who run this trade.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-25-2015 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11836648)
Did you get sucked into the Hootie abyss?

I invested in the hilarity and Nzonee/floppy plus putting in my own input. Hoots wanted a one man show, ran off guys with good ideas, and it became a dumpster fire.Had a damn good week of lineups this week the tournies I was in.

Eleazar 10-25-2015 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11836737)
I invested in the hilarity and Nzonee/floppy plus putting in my own input. Had a damn good week of lineups this week the tournies I was in.

It's interesting to we outsiders that everyone talks about DFS here and no one, ever, ever loses money. (Except Hootie apparently)

And yet these sites still buy up every commercial on TV.

-King- 10-25-2015 10:03 PM

Been more of a lurker lately but this thread gave me too many laughs for me not to post.


How were there 50 grown men willing to give $100 for this? Even without Hootie I'm sure it wouldn't work. But not only did they include Hootie, they made him one of the people in charge of lineups LMAO WHAT THE **** DID YOU EXPECT? Probably the most opinionated and stubborn people on this board, and you have him controlling your money? Good luck.

Nzoner 10-25-2015 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11836745)
It's interesting to we outsiders that everyone talks about DFS here and no one, ever, ever loses money. (Except Hootie apparently)

And yet these sites still buy up every commercial on TV.

The DFS sites are really no different than a Vegas sportsbook,they get theirs first and then pay the winners from the losers.

Oh and I'll be the first to admit I've lost my fair share of tourneys,I've just been one of the fortunate ones to win more than I ever deposited.

Lex Luthor 10-25-2015 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 11836753)
Been more of a lurker lately but this thread gave me too many laughs for me not to post.


How were there 50 grown men willing to give $100 for this? Even without Hootie I'm sure it wouldn't work. But not only did they include Hootie, they made him one of the people in charge of lineups LMAO WHAT THE **** DID YOU EXPECT? Probably the most opinionated and stubborn people on this board, and you have him controlling your money? Good luck.

Reading comprehension fail.

Hootie didn't control the money. He was supposed to be part of a team that created lineups. When he proved that he can't be a team player, he was fired.

Nobody would have signed up if Hootie controlled the money.

alnorth 10-25-2015 10:11 PM

This is just mind-boggling. If I was in a position where I had control over how a $5,000 pool was wagered, 98% of which was other people's money, I'd be terrified of doing anything the group didn't want. I'd make damned sure everyone agreed with the plan before doing anything, and if there was any question or disagreement, I'd do nothing till it was sorted out. Its almost like having a fiduciary duty.

If I felt that I had the secret sauce for winning, and the group wasn't listening to my brilliant idea, **** it, I'd go to the other major DFS site and put my own lineups there.

alnorth 10-25-2015 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11836745)
It's interesting to we outsiders that everyone talks about DFS here and no one, ever, ever loses money. (Except Hootie apparently)

And yet these sites still buy up every commercial on TV.

The group of players as a whole always lose money. They have to, its set up that way, just like a poker room in a casino, the house always takes their rake from the pot, and its up to you to be smarter and more skilled than the other chumps at the table. It is a better business model than a sportsbook, it is literally impossible for the DFS web site to lose, they just take a little piece from each contest and leave most of the pot for the players to fight over.

That said, this idea of taking a very large group of smart people and collectively analyze that week's contest is a good one. Hypothetically, 50+ brains should have a better chance of winning than the lone wolfs who try to figure it out on their own. All you need are rules, solid leadership, and the people in control of the lineups need to be ethical and trustworthy. (woops)

Swanman 10-25-2015 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11836697)
A private forum isn't really this message board.

He dragged it into the main public message board. He is a child.

Lex Luthor 10-25-2015 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swanman (Post 11836779)
He dragged it into the main public message board. He is a child.

If he had left it in the Fanduel forum, I don't think he would have been banned.

Dallas Chief 10-25-2015 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huskerdooz (Post 11836494)
I don't believe I said I was entitled to anything ... and how many winning lineups has he been in since.

How about the group's lineups really aren't any of your business? Thanks.

eDave 10-25-2015 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brainiac (Post 11836785)
If he had left it in the Fanduel forum, I don't think he would have been banned.

Yup. First rule of FanDual Club...

Kaepernick 10-25-2015 10:21 PM

Communal gambling with more Chiefs than Indians. Yea, that's gonna end well.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/191...own-foot-o.gif

CaliforniaChief 10-25-2015 10:23 PM

This is unfortunate to see. I hate seeing this stuff go "real life" like it has, including people's money and personal attacks. It's also too bad that a significant number of us enjoy seeing the drama, encouraging more of it.

I wish we were better than that.

DaneMcCloud 10-25-2015 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 11836793)
I hate seeing this stuff go "real life" like it has, including people's money and personal attacks. It's also too bad that a significant number of us enjoy seeing the drama, encouraging more of it.

Welcome...To Chiefsplanet

BigRedChief 10-25-2015 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 11836769)
This is just mind-boggling. If I was in a position where I had control over how a $5,000 pool was wagered, 98% of which was other people's money, I'd be terrified of doing anything the group didn't want. I'd make damned sure everyone agreed with the plan before doing anything, and if there was any question or disagreement, I'd do nothing till it was sorted out. Its almost like having a fiduciary duty.

I don't know shit about FF, I have nothing to do with lineups.

However, I control the money, the Fan Duel account and the paypal account, no one else. I'm the dude responsible for that fiduciary duty you speak of. Because people have trusted me with their real names, money and if we actually make some serious money, I will not disappear. I've locked out everyone out of the Fan Duel account twice and basically fired Hootie from making lineups without asking anyone or sought approval.

Not had a single complaint yet. So I'm assuming I still have their trust.

-King- 10-25-2015 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brainiac (Post 11836766)
Reading comprehension fail.

Hootie didn't control the money. He was supposed to be part of a team that created lineups. When he proved that he can't be a team player, he was fired.

Nobody would have signed up if Hootie controlled the money.

Semantics. Hootie controlled week 1 lineups. Those lineups lost money for everyone involved. So yeah, hootie did have control of the money.
Posted via Mobile Device

CaliforniaChief 10-25-2015 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11836799)
Welcome...To Chiefsplanet

Oh I know...I'm not a n00b, I'm just lamenting it I guess.

alnorth 10-25-2015 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 11836811)
Semantics. Hootie controlled week 1 lineups. Those lineups lost money for everyone involved. So yeah, hootie did have control of the money.
Posted via Mobile Device

Yeah, from what I gathered, Hootie wasn't supposed to make the final call, but from what I read he still had access to the account and so he had constructive control over the money, if not "official" control.

I do wish the group luck though, because this is a fascinating experiment, and a really good idea in principle if it is organized and executed correctly. Maybe if they work hard the last weeks of the season they can win their money back.

MeatRock 10-25-2015 10:46 PM

Damn. I feel for the people involved. I hope everyone wins their money back and then some. I just can't understand how one guy could feel so empowered with that much on the line from multiple people to treat it all as his own.

Unreal.

TLO 10-25-2015 10:51 PM

Hoots is right up there with Hitler and Stalin. I'm telling ya.

Dayze 10-25-2015 11:05 PM

Adolf Hootler

TimBone 10-25-2015 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 11836831)
Damn. I feel for the people involved. I hope everyone wins their money back and then some. I just can't understand how one guy could feel so empowered with that much on the line from multiple people to treat it all as his own.

Unreal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Li'l Smokey (Post 11836836)
Hoots is right up there with Hitler and Stalin. I'm telling ya.

Now wait a second. I do want to chime in and say that I don't think Hootie had any ill intentions, and he did work very hard. He wanted to win everyone a lot of money. He is just awful at working with other people.

BigRedChief 10-25-2015 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 11836864)
Now wait a second. I do want to chime in and say that I don't think Hootie had any ill intentions, and he did work very hard. He wanted to win everyone a lot of money. He is just awful at working with other people.

THIS! he just thought he had all the answers himself and couldn't work with anyone.

A Salt Weapon 10-25-2015 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 11833187)
I agree that its a LITTLE odd, but it's a group filled with 50 CPers, so it's definitely a group associated with CP if not officially sanctioned.

I'd expect it would be the same deal if someone went to the CP Facebook group and started posting pictures of bunnies getting raped by a squirrel or something.

And now I know about the Chiefs planet Facebook page. Damn hootie was good for something after all.

alnorth 10-25-2015 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 11836865)
THIS! he just thought he had all the answers himself and couldn't work with anyone.

Yeah, I understand that. What he apparently didn't get is that if the group isn't going along with your ideas, even if you think the group is making a stupid mistake, you can't force them your way when their money is at stake. Just wish them luck, chuckle to yourself, then put your own brilliant sure-fire winner lineups up separately at draftkings.

Easy 6 10-26-2015 04:53 AM

Why is hootie logged on at 5:52am?

Go away, joe dirt... no one wants you around.

ChiefRocka 10-26-2015 05:11 AM

Preparing for the BlackBob lawsuit threat.

KCUnited 10-26-2015 05:25 AM

Puts faith, time, and money into the Chiefs every year, laughs at guys gambling $100.

farmerchief 10-26-2015 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 11836864)
Now wait a second. I do want to chime in and say that I don't think Hootie had any ill intentions, and he did work very hard. He wanted to win everyone a lot of money. He is just awful at working with other people.

Yep, I agree. He had some very sound strategies, he just didnt "play well with others" so to speak.:rolleyes:

Coochie liquor 10-26-2015 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themanwithnoname (Post 11833764)
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Holy shit. This forum is such a total ****ing joke. Between how so many people on here trash other Chiefs forums for being homers and yet you keep doing the same ****ing thing (and I have to laugh my ass off at the people running fantasy football bullshit that went Chiefs heavy this year after about the 2nd game and went with Alex Smith, jesus ****ing christ that's idiocy that deserves a special award, which would be an Alex Smith signed picture of him taking a shit in your mouth because damn that's some next level dumb).

Or its this even more hilarious melodrama that you people constantly keep dredging up and then you keep getting pissed about it. You people whine about the gif guy all the ****ing time and yet easily half the time its because you're too stupid to see when he's obviously just ****ing around but you dipshits take it seriously. And then plenty of the rest. The average 13 year old girl is more mature than you ****ing like 30-50 year old men. It's goddamn ****ing pathetic.

Take this thread topic itself. You're going back and forth, yet everything was ****ing documented for you to reference. I don't know why being able to just actually taking the time to go and look at that shit so you know what the **** actually happened is such a problem. You'll spend hours posting he-said bullshit when if you'd take 5 minutes to actually figure it out you'd actually know. But then that'd probably ruin your narrative of how things went in your mind so that you could run around talking shit about people behind their backs.



This is a prime example. Why the **** haven't you people permabanned him? You constantly bitch and moan about him all the ****ing time yet you keep letting him come back and then you spend 6 months ****ing complaining about him til you ban him again. What the ****?

Actually, I'd even say you need to take the stick out of your ass. He wasn't celebrating jack shit (unless you take his trolling seriously, which jesus christ, that's your ****ing problem is that you idiots arbitrarily take trolling seriously or not).

Its funny you guys were bitching and moaning about him being so negative and then you all jumped all over his ****ing nuts gobbling up his jizz when the 2012 season happened (I thankfully wasn't around here at all for shit like 2007-2009. At some point you people either need to embrace being the ****ing clueless Chiefs homers you really are, accept that the franchise you seemingly focus your life around is a total ****ing joke (and that you're goddamn idiots for continuing to subsidize them treating you like the ****ing morons you are), or need to learn to stop letting people like that bug you. But the problem is with you people individually. You're all T.O. level prima donnas, only you seem to just be fat stupid slovenly midwestern guys who get off on acting like spoiled teenage girls.

"whaaaa, someone's pointing out how laughably pathetic my sports team is!" Doesn't matter if they've been doing that all along, and every so often I actually join in on it, but I can't handle it! But I'll let them come back and then I'll be surprised and mad that they go back to doing that after my feckless team sucks ass. :) :shake: :D ROFL



This. So much this. And I'm guessing probably over half the people on this forum would vote for him. But knowing their lack of reading comprehension they'd probably see some instruction "when finished, the ballot should be put in the slot" and go "oh, Putin, **** yeah, he's such a badass, makes Obama look like a ****ing pillowbitergot ass pussy bitch!" and they'd circle that thinking they're voting for Putin.

The people on this board deserve the Chiefs franchise. Hell, I think it's goddamn hilarious how they're calling it a "Kingdom" now, they're full on rubbing it in your dumbshit faces that you're peons mucking their cesspits.

****, even Royals fans eventually learned how things actually operate (sure it took them 20 years). The team is shit, then stop giving them ****ing money until they do something to change that. But no, you'll pay to fly banners and circle jerk off on congratulating yourselves for helping to change things, and then you go back and do exactly the same shit you did when the previous regime came in.

Simply put, you guys suck at being fans, you suck at managing a forum, big shocker that you guys suck just as bad at managing money on betting, and even bigger shocker that you somehow manage to turn that into a bunch of arguing over personal shit that has nothing to do with ****ing anything and I'm guessing from the sounds of it you all fell for monumental trolling in believing that personal shit (but, like your inability to quite this team from butt ****ing your brains out worse than Jake Gyllenhaal's character did to Heath Ledger's, you just can't give up on believing bullshit).

I used to stick around some for the mild amusement the dipshit antics of people on this board brought. This was good for a bit of hearty laugh, just thinking about you ****ing losers losing thousands of dollars betting on fantasy football... ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

HOLY ****ING SHIT. This guy didn't just use our bathroom, he shit all over our bed, ****ed our wife, kicked out dog, and broke our door on the way out the house. Lmmfao!! Classic shit!

TimeForWasp 10-26-2015 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 11836793)
This is unfortunate to see. I hate seeing this stuff go "real life" like it has, including people's money and personal attacks. It's also too bad that a significant number of us enjoy seeing the drama, encouraging more of it.

I wish we were better than that.

Thank you for that. Rep

NewChief 10-26-2015 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farmerchief (Post 11836951)
Yep, I agree. He had some very sound strategies, he just didnt "play well with others" so to speak.:rolleyes:

I mean... it sounds like he may have had sound strategies and a lot of knowledge, but it also sounds like he didn't have the discipline or work ethic to implement those strategies effectively.

Didn't he basically abandon the entire theory of how to assemble diverse lineups when he went all in on the Seattle defense?

Gonzo 10-26-2015 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themanwithnoname (Post 11833764)
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Holy shit. This forum is such a total ****ing joke. Between how so many people on here trash other Chiefs forums for being homers and yet you keep doing the same ****ing thing (and I have to laugh my ass off at the people running fantasy football bullshit that went Chiefs heavy this year after about the 2nd game and went with Alex Smith, jesus ****ing christ that's idiocy that deserves a special award, which would be an Alex Smith signed picture of him taking a shit in your mouth because damn that's some next level dumb).

Or its this even more hilarious melodrama that you people constantly keep dredging up and then you keep getting pissed about it. You people whine about the gif guy all the ****ing time and yet easily half the time its because you're too stupid to see when he's obviously just ****ing around but you dipshits take it seriously. And then plenty of the rest. The average 13 year old girl is more mature than you ****ing like 30-50 year old men. It's goddamn ****ing pathetic.

Take this thread topic itself. You're going back and forth, yet everything was ****ing documented for you to reference. I don't know why being able to just actually taking the time to go and look at that shit so you know what the **** actually happened is such a problem. You'll spend hours posting he-said bullshit when if you'd take 5 minutes to actually figure it out you'd actually know. But then that'd probably ruin your narrative of how things went in your mind so that you could run around talking shit about people behind their backs.



This is a prime example. Why the **** haven't you people permabanned him? You constantly bitch and moan about him all the ****ing time yet you keep letting him come back and then you spend 6 months ****ing complaining about him til you ban him again. What the ****?

Actually, I'd even say you need to take the stick out of your ass. He wasn't celebrating jack shit (unless you take his trolling seriously, which jesus christ, that's your ****ing problem is that you idiots arbitrarily take trolling seriously or not).

Its funny you guys were bitching and moaning about him being so negative and then you all jumped all over his ****ing nuts gobbling up his jizz when the 2012 season happened (I thankfully wasn't around here at all for shit like 2007-2009. At some point you people either need to embrace being the ****ing clueless Chiefs homers you really are, accept that the franchise you seemingly focus your life around is a total ****ing joke (and that you're goddamn idiots for continuing to subsidize them treating you like the ****ing morons you are), or need to learn to stop letting people like that bug you. But the problem is with you people individually. You're all T.O. level prima donnas, only you seem to just be fat stupid slovenly midwestern guys who get off on acting like spoiled teenage girls.

"whaaaa, someone's pointing out how laughably pathetic my sports team is!" Doesn't matter if they've been doing that all along, and every so often I actually join in on it, but I can't handle it! But I'll let them come back and then I'll be surprised and mad that they go back to doing that after my feckless team sucks ass. :) :shake: :D ROFL



This. So much this. And I'm guessing probably over half the people on this forum would vote for him. But knowing their lack of reading comprehension they'd probably see some instruction "when finished, the ballot should be put in the slot" and go "oh, Putin, **** yeah, he's such a badass, makes Obama look like a ****ing pillowbitergot ass pussy bitch!" and they'd circle that thinking they're voting for Putin.

The people on this board deserve the Chiefs franchise. Hell, I think it's goddamn hilarious how they're calling it a "Kingdom" now, they're full on rubbing it in your dumbshit faces that you're peons mucking their cesspits.

****, even Royals fans eventually learned how things actually operate (sure it took them 20 years). The team is shit, then stop giving them ****ing money until they do something to change that. But no, you'll pay to fly banners and circle jerk off on congratulating yourselves for helping to change things, and then you go back and do exactly the same shit you did when the previous regime came in.

Simply put, you guys suck at being fans, you suck at managing a forum, big shocker that you guys suck just as bad at managing money on betting, and even bigger shocker that you somehow manage to turn that into a bunch of arguing over personal shit that has nothing to do with ****ing anything and I'm guessing from the sounds of it you all fell for monumental trolling in believing that personal shit (but, like your inability to quite this team from butt ****ing your brains out worse than Jake Gyllenhaal's character did to Heath Ledger's, you just can't give up on believing bullshit).

I used to stick around some for the mild amusement the dipshit antics of people on this board brought. This was good for a bit of hearty laugh, just thinking about you ****ing losers losing thousands of dollars betting on fantasy football... ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL


Well then... Hello there! You seem nice.
Would you like to be a mod? It's about time we start the new planet order.

KC native 10-26-2015 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief (Post 11837009)
I mean... it sounds like he may have had sound strategies and a lot of knowledge, but it also sounds like he didn't have the discipline or work ethic to implement those strategies effectively.

Didn't he basically abandon the entire theory of how to assemble diverse lineups when he went all in on the Seattle defense?

Yes. He completely abandoned the theory and not just with the Seattle defense bullshit.

Swanman 10-26-2015 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11837028)
Yes. He completely abandoned the theory and not just with the Seattle defense bullshit.

He also had an absurd mancrush on all things Patriots the first week we entered and from a fantasy perspective, Brady and co. had a terrible week.

I said it before in here and it bears repeating - if he was such a stellar FanDuel player, he could bankroll the schemes himself by this point. But he isn't, so he's not.

The really ridiculous thing about the Seattle defense that week is that we let him know that Bobby Wagner was out, and he still stubbornly stuck with them.

BigRichard 10-26-2015 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 11837020)
Well then... Hello there! You seem nice.
Would you like to be a mod? It's about time we start the new planet order.

That has got to be a mult doesn't it?

BigMeatballDave 10-26-2015 08:55 AM

Anyone willing to give me the Cliff Notes on this? :D

notorious 10-26-2015 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11837081)
Anyone willing to give me the Cliff Notes on this? :D

Hootie pulled a Hootie.

Don Corlemahomes 10-26-2015 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 11836968)
HOLY ****ING SHIT. This guy didn't just use our bathroom, he shit all over our bed, ****ed our wife, kicked out dog, and broke our door on the way out the house. Lmmfao!! Classic shit!

And he's still green.

Valiant 10-26-2015 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11837084)
Hootie pulled a Hootie.

They got hootied?


'Hootie and I blow your money' sounds like a band name.

ThaVirus 10-26-2015 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 11836831)
Damn. I feel for the people involved. I hope everyone wins their money back and then some. I just can't understand how one guy could feel so empowered with that much on the line from multiple people to treat it all as his own.



Unreal.


You have to be a real sociopath

Nzoner 10-26-2015 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief (Post 11837009)
I mean... it sounds like he may have had sound strategies and a lot of knowledge, but it also sounds like he didn't have the discipline or work ethic to implement those strategies effectively.

Didn't he basically abandon the entire theory of how to assemble diverse lineups when he went all in on the Seattle defense?

Correct however Hootie didn't like much diversity to whereas my thoughts were if you have 188 line-ups why would you not diversify especially at QB and Def.

Josh McCown our first week was 1.1% owned in the contest and blew up against the horrid Balt pass D scoring 3 less points than Brady and Wilson combined.That's not to say this is full proof as the #1 slot that week did not have McCown showing just how difficult it really is to surround any qb with the other"right" players while staying under the salary cap.It is to say that I believe diversity is the way to attack multiple entries because you're hoping to get that ONE special line-up.

Sully 10-26-2015 09:53 AM

As far as I know, my mother never ****ed a giraffe.

As far as I know...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.