Quote:
Brilliant logic there Socrates. |
Quote:
At the end of the day, he's going to get traded or released. He won't get a bunch of starting job offers across the league, we're talking a handful at best. It isn't for lack of skill, simply because people don't know whether it was him or harbaugh that started producing that managed to cultivate the increase in performance, most people will credit harbaugh. Development and stability are more important at the QB position than any other position out there, guys are going to stop developing physically after their second or third year, the rest will be mental. Given the fact that the kid had 75 different coaches in that short span, most people are going to back off big money and the opportunity to see him play and take that risk. What this means for us is that there's always going to be the possibility that he could end up taking the job here, knowing he's going to get benched for our QBOTF either in this season, or next, and that he'll have a job here as long as he performs well and acts like a model teammate, but not at the big dollar pricetag he has been searching for. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can't point out a single WCO that didn't sign AND draft a QB. Lets look at the QB oriented HC's. point out an example from those where that coach didn't also sign a veteran. |
Quote:
I never even said Smith was the guy we were signing. |
But I'm done. You clearly don't understand how the NFL works.
|
I could care less who the backup is. That's why they're called backups. I want my "starter" to be good. Apparently you want your starter to be as good as their backup. That's what we've had for a long time. How's that worked out for us?
|
It's a cripple fight!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He already lost his job basically without warrant (he was playing lights out at the time actually) and mentored his replacement all the way to the Super Bowl. His first choice won't be to come here and do the exact same thing. If it ends up that nobody wants him as a starter and thus he has no choice, you're likely looking at one bitter guy. No matter how you slice it, the ONLY way he fits here is if he's the starter. |
Quote:
No thanks. |
Quote:
And no, "our guy" wasn't in last years' draft, you ****ing moron. The Chiefs, in their brilliant wisdom, refused to trade up for RGIII or Tannehill. They weren't going to take Weeden (thank Christ) and ****ing Brock Osweiler got taken before Russell Wilson. The rest of these QBs are garbage, and would likely get drafted in the exact same positions if they were a part of this year's class. We were never in position to take one of the QBs from last year who started and did well. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.