I was just stating a fact, not an opinion.

I was pointing out the ludicrous nature of "conference pride". Mizzou fans are taking so much pride in a conference they haven't even joined yet. It's as if you are already redefining your identity based on SEC membership.

How about taking a bit of ****ing pride in just being Mizzou? Screw all the conference crap and the rivalry crap and just be proud of what you are based on your own history?

Sorry... I guess that's more of a KU thing.

As another member of the famed moderators "inner circle" I can only state unequivocally that I think you're being mean to us K-Staters. I bear neither you nor your fridge, nor the SEC any ill will.

With MU or without, I'm feeling like Scrooge McDuck swimming in his pool of gold coins.

(Just realized you can't spell one who sucks the penis-edMc w/o McDuck either.)

Conference pride is ludicrous. /KU fan

We won't play Mizzou because they weren't loyal to the conference. /KU fan

We won't play you because a bunch of ****stains in Columbia have actively tried to destroy the Big 12 for years. You flirt with the Big 12, and they said "Thanks, but no thanks", then you put on your kneepads and demonstrated your deep throat action on the SEC, then came back with, "Look, we got invited!".

You've said, "We want nothing to do with the Big 12". Guess what numbnuts? KU is in the Big 12, and we're accommodating you.

And all of a sudden, the Big 12 is a LOT more stable.

Wow, for someone who has been touting facts the last few pages, this is a whole lot of butthurt opinion.

I love it when you get all emotional. Your generally common sense takes turn into silly middle school girl rants.

No shit. I think once actual football starts back up most of this shit will die and we will focus on our teams. I'm actually excited to see the team we field this year and just how dominant DGB is, conference bullshit be damned.
Posted via Mobile Device

First, http://bjays.files.wordpress.com/200...e-law-blog.jpg

Second, do you have a link for the kneepads bit?

Oklahoma was an Oklahoma State away from being in the PAC-12. Seriously. Oklahoma reps passed legislature that bound OU to OSU, and the PAC didn't want the academics (or lack thereof) that OSU would bring to the conference.

There is a lot, LOT, of evidence that Texas would've quickly followed suit in that move with OU.

The members of this conference have constantly kept their options open publicly, while privately flirting with any decent suitor who would listen. You can strawman this and claim that Missouri's Big 10 flirtation started it, but that's logically wrong.

I just get pissed off about dumbshits taking so much ****ing pride in a conference they've never belonged to. Hey, look how green their grass is!

**** them.

I got sick of that shit when I was at Wichita State. WSU did everything they could to compare themselves KState and KU. I got sick of it. And after I moved on, the resentment for KU and KState grew even worse in the professional realm. I moved to Lawrence and saw what it was like to be here. KU doesn't envy Mizzou, North Carolina, Duke, Alabama, LSU, Harvard, Oxford or Stanford. KU knows who they are and are working hard to be the best they can be, without a bunch of petty jealousy.

But by all means. Wave your banner high.

Tell the world. WE'RE THE SEC! Oh, and we're mizzou.

Can't show the video here. It's a violation of the TOS.

We are all up under your skin dude. Good luck with all that.

Is it possible that the SEC actually wanted Missouri? That it wasn't a "favor"? That the University of Missouri was seen, by the conference, as a strong and desirable addition, even though the conference passed on the likes of West Virginia?

Meanwhile Texas and Oklahoma are falling over themselves to try and figure out a good way to bolt.