ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Mecole Hardman Thread***** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322592)

smithandrew051 08-20-2019 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14403040)
I heard a lot of good on Campbell early on, but it seems to have faded as Luck contracted aids again


For like the umpteenth time, no. They were drafting a WR no matter what on the Tyreek front.

Exactly. Watkins is likely gone after this year. We need to keep young reliable weapons around Mahomes. We can’t take the risk of wasting a Mahomes’s career on a team with no weapons.

smithandrew051 08-20-2019 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14402033)
You know what, Hardmon kinda reminds me of a A.J. Green type body composition. God if he can High Point the ball on a consistent basis like he did the other night....

You're ****ed, just ****kkkked

I was thinking Antonio Brown. They’re about the exact same size.

New World Order 08-20-2019 07:57 PM

Reminds me a lot of Antonio Brown

-King- 08-20-2019 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14403040)
I heard a lot of good on Campbell early on, but it seems to have faded as Luck contracted aids again


For like the umpteenth time, no. They were drafting a WR no matter what on the Tyreek front.

Yeah they were drafting a WR at some point in the draft of course. You really think they set out to draft one with their first pick before the tyreek shit came out?

staylor26 08-20-2019 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14403068)
Yeah they were drafting a WR at some point in the draft of course. You really think they set out to draft one with their first pick before the tyreek shit came out?

Yes. There were rumors before anything even happened with Tyreek, even before the the start of the league year, that we were looking to add more weapons.

-King- 08-20-2019 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14403075)
Yes. There were rumors before anything even happened with Tyreek, even before the the start of the league year, that we were looking to add more weapons.

Like I just said, I'm sure we were going to get another WR at some point but I bet they were aiming for defense with that first pick if not for the Tyreek Hill thing. That expedited the need. And now, because Tyreek didn't get suspended or worse, Hardman is a luxury player and an insurance plan if/when someone gets injured. But no I don't believe they set out to draft a WR with their first pick in the draft.

staylor26 08-20-2019 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14403102)
Like I just said, I'm sure we were going to get another WR at some point but I bet they were aiming for defense with that first pick if not for the Tyreek Hill thing. That expedited the need. And now, because Tyreek didn't get suspended or worse, Hardman is a luxury player and an insurance plan if/when someone gets injured. But no I don't believe they set out to draft a WR with their first pick in the draft.

But the implication was we were looking to add one with an early pick or a top FA/trade target.

Buckweath 08-20-2019 09:06 PM

I have given the Brandin Cooks comparison. Do people think they can find a better comparison?

keg in kc 08-20-2019 09:09 PM

If the idea was to replace or cover for Hill's absence, we wouldn't have done it through the draft. That's just not how Reid operates. So I have never thought that Hardman's selection was anything more than them taking the best player on their board. If he's replacing anyone, it's Watkins sometime down the road.

And his performance so far, which is surprising considering Reid's history of not even giving rookies on offense the opportunity to contribute, has totally justified that pick. I never thought they'd give him the chance to be the 3rd wide out this soon, and while he needs to work on beating press (like virtually all young WRs...) he just looks straight-up dangerous so far. He might (or might not) still be technically behind Robinson on the depth chart when the season starts, but I think he's going to become a pretty key player fairly quickly this year.

Pitt Gorilla 08-20-2019 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14403068)
Yeah they were drafting a WR at some point in the draft of course. You really think they set out to draft one with their first pick before the tyreek shit came out?

Yes, he was the top player remaining on their board. I think they were surprised he was still available, so they moved up.

prhom 08-20-2019 09:15 PM

I don’t think it’s far-fetched to think Veach was considering WR with our first pick regardless of the Hill situation. Hill has been pretty healthy, as has Kelce. Watkins is less reliable in that area. The Pats were able to keep us down just long enough to win by doubling Hill. Kelce and Watkins weren’t quite enough to win that game. With Hardman in the mix we could create new matchup issues for teams that try the Pats strategy of doubling Hill.

smithandrew051 08-20-2019 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 14403143)
I have given the Brandin Cooks comparison. Do people think they can find a better comparison?

What about Marvin Harrison?

Both around the exact same size. Harrison ran a 4.38 40 and Hardman ran a 4.33 40. Very similar builds.

-King- 08-21-2019 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prhom (Post 14403152)
I don’t think it’s far-fetched to think Veach was considering WR with our first pick regardless of the Hill situation. Hill has been pretty healthy, as has Kelce. Watkins is less reliable in that area. The Pats were able to keep us down just long enough to win by doubling Hill. Kelce and Watkins weren’t quite enough to win that game. With Hardman in the mix we could create new matchup issues for teams that try the Pats strategy of doubling Hill.

Our early struggles in that game were mainly related to Pat being off, not because of the WRs struggling.

-King- 08-21-2019 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14403147)
If the idea was to replace or cover for Hill's absence, we wouldn't have done it through the draft. That's just not how Reid operates. So I have never thought that Hardman's selection was anything more than them taking the best player on their board. If he's replacing anyone, it's Watkins sometime down the road.

And his performance so far, which is surprising considering Reid's history of not even giving rookies on offense the opportunity to contribute, has totally justified that pick. I never thought they'd give him the chance to be the 3rd wide out this soon, and while he needs to work on beating press (like virtually all young WRs...) he just looks straight-up dangerous so far. He might (or might not) still be technically behind Robinson on the depth chart when the season starts, but I think he's going to become a pretty key player fairly quickly this year.

Tyreeks thing came right before the draft and after free agency had already died down. There was no other option to add a good WR.

I'm just saying that saying they drafted Hardman with the first pick because of the uncertainty of the Tyreek situation isn't close to a hot take.

JakeF 08-21-2019 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 14403168)
What about Marvin Harrison?

Both around the exact same size. Harrison ran a 4.38 40 and Hardman ran a 4.33 40. Very similar builds.

I don't get the Marvin comparison.

Hardmen plays a bigger than he looks, Harrison looked smaller
Hardman is physical, Harrison was finesse.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.