come again?

Why?

I don't understand why support for pedos is so high on CP.

I can't imagine that's true. Seeing someone naked doesn't "harm" anyone directly, but I'd suggest one not expose themselves to kids or anyone in public, as the laws don't take kindly to that sort of behavior. It's often the "thought" or motivation behind the act that makes it more serious.

What I mean is that there is not likely to be a law that specifically prohibits you from putting your semen into cupcake batter, cooking it, and then giving it to someone. That's why I cited the laws that I think would potentially be applicable. The most likely law is one against adulterating food based upon the rules for statutory interpretation.

As far as public nudity, there are laws against public nudity in most jurisdictions in this country. So you can say "California statute 123.456.789 (or whatever) prohibits the knowing lewd exhibition of the genitals, anus, or female breast of any person in a public place or a place reasonably accessible by members of the public" or whatever statutory language is used by California or some other jurisdiction. That is a quite specific law that focuses upon the conduct you are describing.

I do not know of any specific law that says, "A person commits a criminal violation by adding semen to cupcake batter, preparing the cupcakes, and then distributing them to persons without their knowledge" or whatever. Rather, I would anticipate that she would face charges that relate to adulterating food because that is the closest statutory prohibition that I could think of as related to this act. If Louisiana has laws specifically against baking semen in cupcake, I would expect that this issue has arisen before because this isn't really conduct that legislatures consider when crafting criminal codes out of whole cloth.

The reason I discussed the harm to someone is that would be a factor for the court to consider in sentencing. If I give someone a brownie laced with a laxative and they have diarrhea to the point that they become dehydrated and need hospital treatment, that degree of harm will factor into sentencing. Contrast that with someone who pees in the office coffee. Is it disgusting? Absolutely. But such conduct is not likely to cause physical harm to those who drink the coffee. In such an instance, the person who put the laxative into the food is likely to receive a harsher sentence than the one who peed in the office coffee even though the coffee pee-r conduct is undoubtedly far more disgusting. The discussion was about reasonable sentences for this conduct and I was explaining factors that would drive down a sentence (lack of harm) versus factors that would increase a sentence (abuse of a position of trust).

That's pretty easily disproven. Just search for something like "Arrested for putting semen in food." You'll find tons of results. A quick search shows Assault with Bodily Fluids as the charge.

If that was the only thing she did, she would have been charged as such. They likely didn't need to bother with those kinds of charges here, because it wasn't necessary for a conviction due to the other much worse charges.

You're missing my point. Notice that 'assault with bodily fluids' does not address which fluid or cupcakes or anything like that. My original post described harassment in the first degree as a similar statute.

I am not saying that people cannot be charged for putting semen into food. I am saying that any charges for this type of conduct are brought under a statute of broad applicability that is applied to those circumstances rather than a narrow law specifically tailored to specific circumstances. Assault with bodily fluids can cover a wide variety of circumstances. A statute like "Possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver" is a much narrower statute and isn't broadly applied.

The cupcake charges got the press because those charges will sell news ads, not because they're the most serious or because they're driving the charges.

What? So, your point is that there aren't laws specifying the exact combination of semen and cupcakes? LOL, OK you win I guess.

Come to think about it I've never heard of a fast food fapper getting time...

Really??? You think it's because we support pedos? :rolleyes:

What rock you been hiding under and how can you be so obtuse? :facepalm:

Re-read that statement.

Did you do that on purpose?...

I don't support them. I only judge guilty or not guilty.

No. I had posted I thought 41 years for putting semen in cupcake was excessive and someone asked about it. So I posted that while there is no particular statute, there are some broad statutes that would be used to cover the behavior and they were misdemeanors and that you don't get 41 years for a misdemeanor. It was part of a discussion about what would be an appropriate punishment and why.

When will NJChiefs and MKP end up in this thread?

When the title is changed to "Men that have never had sex"

that whole thing is gross. way guilty. electric chair

What really sucks is that by the law of human decency, the parents of the students should be allowed to tar and feather this woman and then beat the crap out of her...but that's illegal. Feeding semen to their kids is worse IMO, but that's the law I guess...

We need to get some more HOT teachers.

This thread is now more like CRAZY teachers.

I had a few very bangable teachers and I even got to make out with a very hot teacher 2 years after graduation.

She and two other teachers were out at a very crowded bar/night club in Belmar NJ and she got drunk on Jack and Cokes. We began dancing, then closer during the slow part and then started making out.

The two other teachers then intervened and yanked her away. She was about 26 or 27 and I was 20. Ah, my youth was so ****ing good!

"Fast Food Fappers" would be a good band name.

Regardless of looks, they are all crazy outside of the 1% where it’s like an 18 year old and a 22 year old that aren’t even necessarily direct student/teacher to each other.

Were those two teachers older than her?

If so, they were probably jealous.

ROFL

Many/most of these cases involve pedos and these cases bring you "excitement." Is that not correct?

They literally wouldn't be in this thread if they weren't involved with school-age kids. What about that is exciting to you?

:spock:

Probably the best explanation on the topic.

Let me guess. She settled for a beta after her looks started to fade. Got bored with Billy Beta and decided to relive her high school thrills with the soccer player.

Typical story.

The fantasy of being a young teenager and banging a hot teacher like 99% of all red blooded males.

Not sure what group you are the 1% of that finds all this unpleasant.

Check your testosterone levels.

And the announcer: GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!



https://media-exp1.licdn.com/dms/ima...1kcSVP_QJsozBs

So, now that you are no longer a teenager, you're fantasizing/looking forward to teachers banging underaged kids? Am I understanding this correctly?

I can't imagine that kind of sickness has anything to do with testosterone.

If you are so offended by it why did you click into the thread, read it, reply, come back again and reply again? Pretty sick of you.

😆

Dude, did you not have any hot teachers you fantasized about as a young lad?

He/She is sounding more and more like a Eunuch after each post in this thread

Two words... prey vs predator

Back to the cupcakes. I bet more cupcakes were made in disgusting homes and brought to school with worse than sperm. Cat shit on the kitchen counter and table. Turtle shit on the floor, bitch drops the spatula on the floor picks it up and continues mixing batter.

that is the reason a lot of schools have outlawed food made at home.

Food with icky stuff in it. Food laced with drugs. given to teachers and kids.

Most of the bans are due to food allergies, are they not? I know they can't have anything containing nuts or peanuts.

forgot about that too.

peanuts, nuts, gluten, dairy....my kid is severe celiac


The Bad mom movie--Bake sale...No nuts, gluten, eggs, dairy, etc.

Kill it with fire.

https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/tag/symantha-hicks/

17 years old at a military school. This would be a not guilty with those circumstances.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zkvo8l8dMs...s.mercy.1-.JPG


https://media3.giphy.com/media/pOiLsNJbifWxi/200.gif


Seems in 1978 this would be a nothing burger though.

I haven’t seen a hot teacher in this thread for years now, years.

Being a Packer fan, this is probably much more your style.

I agree. Heartbreaking.

"Hot" is a subjective term, I guess.
To each their own.

He your boyfriend?

No, you're free to make your move.

Hall of Classics Thread

I have the testosterone of a 65 year old woman right now and I see the allure. So, that ain't it...

I think the hot ones wised up and now just create social media accounts to show the goods online while making money.

It's like Dog Day Afternoon these past few years. Need some more hotties to **** up and bang a few students to get this thread back on track.

In the meantime, the Johnny Depp trial Forensic Psychologist will do just fine.

"What do you see in this ink blot, Mr. Rain Man?"

"I see you naked."

"How about this one?"

"Uh, it looks like you naked again."

"And this one?"

"You naked, but lying on your back."

https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.town...size=500%2C500

https://www.ncnewsonline.com/news/lo...b2adf61aa.html

While one former Wilmington Area High School music director is waiting to stand trial on sexual assault-related charges, his successor at the same school is now also facing sex-related charges.

A district judge on Friday issued a warrant for the arrest of Olivia Lois Ortz, 26, of Hermitage, who is accused of having an inappropriate physical romantic relationship with a 17-year-old female student while Ortz was the Wilmington High School choral teacher.

New Wilmington Borough police on Friday charged Ortz with two counts of intercourse/sexual contact with a school student, and one count each of unlawful contact with a minor for sexual offenses and criminal use of a communication facility, all felony-level charges.

Ortz was at large throughout the weekend and sang in the Shenango Valley Chorale’s 50th anniversary concert Sunday in downtown Sharon before turning herself in to authorities Monday afternoon. She is the secretary of the chorale organization.

Borough police Chief Carmen Piccirillo, who conducted the investigation against Ortz, said she surrendered herself at the advice of her attorney. She was arraigned by District Judge Rick Russo, who committed her to the Lawrence County jail on a $150,000 bond, which she posted.

Her case follows a sex-related case filed in June 2020, by Lawrence County District Attorney detectives against Jonathan Priano, 37, the former band and music teacher at Wilmington High, who also is accused of misconduct with various students. Allegations are that he had an affinity for tickling the feet of his female students and having close, personal relationships with them.

When school officials learned of the allegations against Ortz, she was immediately suspended from teaching, initially with pay. She resigned from her position May 9 during the course of the investigation, according to Wilmington Superintendent Dr. Terence P. Meehan.

Absolutely, not guilty...

Eh, does anyone have a video of this affair, can't really do any congratulations because it was a wasted opportunity without a recording

Hopefully she was wearing the glasses...

https://nypost.com/wp-content/upload...trip=all&w=744

When I google Olivia Lois Ortz, that's the image I get

That’s the image I seen with the article, when I read the story

BOTH NOT GUILTY!

Might be the same girl in the pics. Although, the first one is Schwing City!

Yeah, they're probably the same.
She looks more like the smoking hot and batshit crazy Amber Heard in the pic I found.

Hot in the first pic and really cute in the mug shot. Not guilty for sure.

5’11?


Hello!

Didn't notice that. Even hotter now.

well she's still not guilty

Raise your standards, gentlemen.

:harumph:

LMAO

The band girls at Wilmington High School must be irresistible sirens. They lure both male and female teachers to their demise.

No guilty next!

Choral teacher...heh

In my head read Clitoral. Well I am screwed the rest of the day.

And both those teachers would be referred to as clitorides.

True statement. Used in a sentence...

I wish I had those Clitorides when I was in high school.

Imagine the next person who gets that job. They will be watched closely.

Not guilty.

Now we’re getting back on track. See? It pays to say something.

And one time at band camp, my teacher stuck her flute in my...

They should hire this guy:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uZ5VNXIiv1c" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Stumbled onto the Twitter account Mugshawtys

Yes, it is what you think it is. Its outstanding.

https://twitter.com/mugshawtys?s=20&...jAJvffHFfYEqBQ

For example:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">burglary <a href="https://t.co/3SadH7FRYA">pic.twitter.com/3SadH7FRYA</a></p>&mdash; mugshawtys (@mugshawtys) <a href="https://twitter.com/mugshawtys/status/1537799576739930112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">prostitution for gasoline (approached an old man offering sexual favors for a full tank of gas, that old man called the police) <a href="https://t.co/i5KCvzylO6">pic.twitter.com/i5KCvzylO6</a></p>&mdash; mugshawtys (@mugshawtys) <a href="https://twitter.com/mugshawtys/status/1535641729575309319?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I've followed that account for about 4 years now. Not too shabby. They have one on instagram as well.

https://twitter.com/KTLA/status/1107...AX7jEE0Jg&s=19

Arrest the kid too.

LMAO

This had to be a bet.

GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY