ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Let's talk WRs (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=286694)

OldSchool 03-19-2015 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky 52 (Post 11391645)
I think the third is when we'll get a wr.

I can see Dorsey pulling the trigger on a super raw dude like Darren Waller with the 3rd round comp. He seems to enjoy projects.

I hope McBride isn't gone by then.

kcchiefsus 03-19-2015 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky 52 (Post 11391645)
I think the third is when we'll get a wr.

Would be ****ing stupid yet again.

Maclin is an upgrade, sure. But there's a reason teams carry 5 wide receivers usually. We have jack shit at WR after Maclin. Wilson looks promising but we still need another 2 receivers. Wait until the third and we're looking at table scraps and a player that likely isn't going to amount to shit..

philfree 03-19-2015 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11391280)
I can see about 8-9 of them going before our 2nd pick.

White
Cooper
Parker
Strong
DGB
Perriman
Dorsett
Agholor
Smith

I doubt we pick DGB at 18 so assuming the top three are off the board a trade down and a pick of Agholor might the only way we get the WR we need.

Jakemall 03-19-2015 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 11391752)
Would be ****ing stupid yet again.

Maclin is an upgrade, sure. But there's a reason teams carry 5 wide receivers usually. We have jack shit at WR after Maclin. Wilson looks promising but we still need another 2 receivers. Wait until the third and we're looking at table scraps and a player that likely isn't going to amount to shit..

Need time to throw if you're going to utilize those great WRs. But we've addressed some on the line too. I'd expect BPA at our pick between WR, OL and maybe DB and let the draft fall however it falls.

The Franchise 03-19-2015 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky 52 (Post 11391645)
I think the third is when we'll get a wr.

2nd unless one of the top 3 falls. And then another WR around the 5th round.

jd1020 03-19-2015 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11392662)
2nd unless one of the top 3 falls. And then another WR around the 5th round.

Agreed.

Sammie Coates in the 2nd round because he's big, strong, fast, and not ready for the NFL.

OldSchool 03-19-2015 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 11392717)
Agreed.

Sammie Coates in the 2nd round because he's big, strong, fast, and not ready for the NFL.

ROFL And for people who hated Bowe for his ill-timed drops, they're going to be out for blood with Coates.

The Franchise 03-19-2015 02:44 PM

Dorsett/Agholor in the 2nd and McBride in the 5th.

jd1020 03-19-2015 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11392719)
ROFL And for people who hated Bowe for his ill-timed drops, they're going to be out for blood with Coates.

Dorsey likes to try and turn water into wine.

RunKC 03-19-2015 02:46 PM

Mcbride is going in round 3 at worst. No way a guy that big and fast with elite hops and high point ability lasts that long.
I could even see him in the late 2nd round

OldSchool 03-19-2015 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11392734)
Mcbride is going in round 3 at worst. No way a guy that big and fast with elite hops and high point ability lasts that long.
I could even see him in the late 2nd round

If we take one in the 3rd or later, Dez Lewis or Tony Lippett could be the picks.

I also wouldn't put it past Dorsey to take Darren Waller in the 4th or take a flier on the injured DeAndre Smelter.

Hardy could be there in the 3rd as well due to his lack of elite athleticism.

Urc Burry 03-19-2015 08:27 PM

Say parker slips to the mid teens.. Would you throw in a 4th or so to land him?

kccrow 03-19-2015 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 11393386)
Say parker slips to the mid teens.. Would you throw in a 4th or so to land him?

I would. I like Parker a bunch.

Saccopoo 03-19-2015 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 11393386)
Say parker slips to the mid teens.. Would you throw in a 4th or so to land him?

No.

While he's got the height, his get off from the line isn't elite and I think you get a better all-around player in Tre McBride with a third round pick. The one thing that Parker does better than anyone in the draft is highpoint the ball, but his initial speed from the snap isn't really impressive. However, I think that McBride is very close to Parker in terms of his catch radius and he's better off the line and on his breaks.

If La'el Collins isn't there, I'm inclined to take a freak in the first versus just a "good player at a position of need."

kccrow 03-19-2015 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11393425)
No.

While he's got the height, his get off from the line isn't elite and I think you get a better all-around player in Tre McBride with a third round pick. The one thing that Parker does better than anyone in the draft is highpoint the ball, but his initial speed from the snap isn't really impressive. However, I think that McBride is very close to Parker in terms of his catch radius and he's better off the line and on his breaks.

If La'el Collins isn't there, I'm inclined to take a freak in the first versus just a "good player at a position of need."

Collins is just a "good player at a position of need." What freaks you talking about that would still be there?

Urc Burry 03-19-2015 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11393425)
No.

While he's got the height, his get off from the line isn't elite and I think you get a better all-around player in Tre McBride with a third round pick. The one thing that Parker does better than anyone in the draft is highpoint the ball, but his initial speed from the snap isn't really impressive. However, I think that McBride is very close to Parker in terms of his catch radius and he's better off the line and on his breaks.

If La'el Collins isn't there, I'm inclined to take a freak in the first versus just a "good player at a position of need."

I haven't watched a whole lot of McBride. I'll have to check him out. Parker just kind of reminds me of a poor mans aj green. Tall, slender build, and such a good red zone target. I do prefer cooper over him though. That guy is so fluid in everything he does.

I've seen a few mocks where they had both available at the saints pick. And I think that's going to be the one you'd have to trade up for to jump the Dolphins.

OldSchool 03-19-2015 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11393425)
No.

While he's got the height, his get off from the line isn't elite and I think you get a better all-around player in Tre McBride with a third round pick. The one thing that Parker does better than anyone in the draft is highpoint the ball, but his initial speed from the snap isn't really impressive. However, I think that McBride is very close to Parker in terms of his catch radius and he's better off the line and on his breaks.

If La'el Collins isn't there, I'm inclined to take a freak in the first versus just a "good player at a position of need."

Check out Cosell's eval of Parker:

Quote:

Based on tape study, NFL Films' Greg Cosell envisions Louisville WR DeVante Parker as a "complementary" Michael Crabtree-type receiver in the pros, as opposed to a true No. 1 wideout.
Cosell believes Parker is "not really vertically explosive" and more of a "short-to-intermediate receiver" who presumably may need offensive scheme to threaten downfield. "DeVante Parker to me is probably a second-tier wide receiver in the NFL, not a lead dog," said Cosell. Parker ran forty times of 4.45 and 4.50 at the Combine. He measured in at 6-foot-3 and 209 pounds.

Jakemall 03-19-2015 10:04 PM

I'd let the draft dictate. Parker would be a good pick up but so would La'El Collins.

I could see something like one of the two situations happening:

1. Parker
2. Paul Dawson or Quinten Rollins (as a safety)
3. Donovan Smith

or

1. La'El Collins
2. Rollins
3. Devin Funchess (as a WR)

I'm more inclined to go with the later because at WR we're talking about the 4th or 5th option now.

OldSchool 03-19-2015 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 11393524)
I'd let the draft dictate. Parker would be a good pick up but so would La'El Collins.

I could see something like one of the two situations happening:

1. Parker
2. Paul Dawson or Quinten Rollins (as a safety)
3. Donovan Smith

or

1. La'El Collins
2. Rollins
3. Devin Funchess (as a WR)

I'm more inclined to go with the later because at WR we're talking about the 4th or 5th option now.

I'd puke if we drafted Funchess. He's gonna bust harder than Jon Baldwin.

Give me McBride, Dez lewis, DeAndre Smelter, Greene, Hardy, anyone over Funchess, lol.

Jakemall 03-19-2015 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11393528)
I'd puke if we drafted Funchess. He's gonna bust harder than Jon Baldwin.

Give me McBride, Dez lewis, DeAndre Smelter, Greene, Hardy, anyone over Funchess, lol.

He's a 3rd rounder...he couldn't bust harder if he walked out the day after he signed. I don't have any particular fondness for him. I was just thinking large target for the redzone.

I have been thinking DGB might go early 3rd. Maybe with a move that is the pick?

The Franchise 03-25-2015 12:20 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Former <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/UCF?src=hash">#UCF</a> WR Breshad Perriman just ran a 4.26 forty at his pro day, according to his agent, <a href="https://twitter.com/RosenhausSports">@RosenhausSports</a>. Blazing.</p>&mdash; Rand Getlin (@Rand_Getlin) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin/status/580795150978281473">March 25, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

OldSchool 03-25-2015 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11402941)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Former <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/UCF?src=hash">#UCF</a> WR Breshad Perriman just ran a 4.26 forty at his pro day, according to his agent, <a href="https://twitter.com/RosenhausSports">@RosenhausSports</a>. Blazing.</p>&mdash; Rand Getlin (@Rand_Getlin) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin/status/580795150978281473">March 25, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yup, just saw that. No way that he's a legit 4.2 guy. He looks like a 4.4 dude on tape, 4.2 players don't get caught from behind in the open field, ever.

O.city 03-25-2015 12:35 PM

He's 6 "2 213. if he runs under a 4.4 that's great

Direckshun 03-25-2015 12:39 PM

Whaaaaaat.

If he's a 4.3 guy, prepare to see Chiefs interest...

OldSchool 03-25-2015 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 11402981)
Whaaaaaat.

If he's a 4.3 guy, prepare to see Chiefs interest...

Dwayne Bowe v2.

Jakemall 03-25-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11402990)
Dwayne Bowe v2.

Dwayne Bowe ran a 4.4 or better?? I don't believe it.

Jakemall 03-25-2015 12:53 PM

By the way, I read his weaknesses as being his route running and other skills being extremely raw.

I find that kinda surprising considering his father played WR for 10 years in the NFL.

OldSchool 03-25-2015 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 11403003)
Dwayne Bowe ran a 4.4 or better?? I don't believe it.

Not his speed, just how he plays. Inconsistent ball skills & hands, bad routes, etc.

jonzie04 03-25-2015 01:02 PM

well that sucks hes a goner in the 1st for sure. i would have loved to have gone something like collins, and then perriman or mcbride.

btw he and bowe arent even close to the same type of player... perriman doesn't have legitmate 4.2 speed, but he's extremely explosive. an acrobatic, high flying type of receiver.

jonzie04 03-25-2015 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11403026)
Not his speed, just how he plays. Inconsistent ball skills & hands, bad routes, etc.

no, thats a silly way to call two receivers the same... by your definition dewayne bowe and desean jackson are the same as jackson also has inconsistent hands, ball skills, and runs poor routes.

OldSchool 03-25-2015 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonzie04 (Post 11403038)
no, thats a silly way to call two receivers the same... by your definition dewayne bowe and desean jackson are the same as jackson also has inconsistent hands, ball skills, and runs poor routes.

Just watch him play dude, you'll see it.

O.city 03-25-2015 01:12 PM

Perriman has bad hands though right? Pass

jonzie04 03-25-2015 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11403039)
Just watch him play dude, you'll see it.

i've seen him play in several games... he and bowe aren't even remotely similar type of receivers. is he inconsistent? sure. but that and i suppose body type is about where the similarities end.

jonzie04 03-25-2015 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11403055)
Perriman has bad hands though right? Pass

incorrect. he has inconsistent hands, but his hands are great.

milkman 03-25-2015 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonzie04 (Post 11403062)
incorrect. he has inconsistent hands, but his hands are great.

How can one have both great and inconsistent hands?

OldSchool 03-25-2015 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonzie04 (Post 11403062)
incorrect. he has inconsistent hands, but his hands are great.

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/...20140212003602

OldSchool 03-25-2015 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11403055)
Perriman has bad hands though right? Pass

Per rotoworld:

Quote:

UCF WR Breshad Perriman had a drop rate of 12.96% in 2014, according to PFF.
That is terrible. The sample size might be smaller than others, as Perriman dropped seven of 54 catchable passes, but PFF has a tendency to side with the receiver on what exactly is "catchable."
Perriman would have generated more buzz if he worked out at the Combine and still has a shot at being a late first-round selection, but very poor drop rates tend to carry over to the NFL - at least early on. Mar 4 - 10:13 AM

jonzie04 03-25-2015 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11403074)
How can one have both great and inconsistent hands?

It's entire subjective.. To me having great hands = having the ability to make ridiculously acrobatic catches, tough catches in traffic etc.

Inconsistent hands = lapse in concentration from time to time. Trying to turn and run before the ball is caught.

Terel Owens is the ultimate example of having great, but inconsistent hands.

Nightfyre 03-25-2015 01:30 PM

I call bullshit on a 4.26 40 from Perriman.

kccrow 03-25-2015 01:45 PM

If you told me Perriman ran a 4.46 forty, I'd believe it. 4.26? No way in hell.

Nightfyre 03-25-2015 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 11403168)
If you told me Perriman ran a 4.46 forty, I'd believe it. 4.26? No way in hell.

Even running 4.46 would surprise me. He looks like a 4.5-4.6 guy to me on tape against college competition. He wasn't just blowing by guys even at the college level.

jonzie04 03-25-2015 01:49 PM

Wasn't Kelvin benjamin dubbed the next job Baldwin by you draft gurus lol? He's another example of having great but inconsistent hands.yes he has a high drop rate but, When you see a guy go up and come down with a ball sandwiched between two defenders like Sherman and Thomas, then he has great hands.

OldSchool 03-25-2015 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 11403168)
If you told me Perriman ran a 4.46 forty, I'd believe it. 4.26? No way in hell.

Yup. Perriman is a 4.4 dude from what I've seen. Still plenty fast but nowhere near a 4.2 guy.

The Franchise 03-25-2015 02:24 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>That sound you hear? Crowder moving up draft boards --&gt; RT <a href="https://twitter.com/jjones9">@jjones9</a>: Duke&#39;s Jamison Crowder ran 4.39 today <a href="https://t.co/af1GU4FgCM">https://t.co/af1GU4FgCM</a></p>&mdash; Rand Getlin (@Rand_Getlin) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin/status/580827277723746304">March 25, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

milkman 03-25-2015 02:24 PM

Great hands means you rarely lose focus.

Inconsistent hands means you have concentration lapses.

chiefscafan 03-25-2015 02:31 PM

Sorry I still want amarie cooper

He won't be there for us though but if he is he's the pick

ToxSocks 03-25-2015 02:57 PM

Imma go ahead and jump on the Phillip Dorsett Bandwagon.

With that speed and playmaking ability....man....

Put Charles, DaT, Maclin, Dorsey and Kelce on the field at the same time? That's a lot of speed and home run hitters.

Urc Burry 03-25-2015 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 11403337)
Imma go ahead and jump on the Phillip Dorsett Bandwagon.

With that speed and playmaking ability....man....

Put Charles, DaT, Maclin, Dorsey and Kelce on the field at the same time? That's a lot of speed and home run hitters.

Would much rather have Lockett who is of the same build... not quite as fast, but I think he is the best route runner in the draft.

look what he does to Verrett
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JjJoSeQxAa0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

buddha 03-26-2015 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 11391752)
Would be ****ing stupid yet again.

Maclin is an upgrade, sure. But there's a reason teams carry 5 wide receivers usually. We have jack shit at WR after Maclin. Wilson looks promising but we still need another 2 receivers. Wait until the third and we're looking at table scraps and a player that likely isn't going to amount to shit..

This...exactly right.

Maclin is the first step in building a credible receiving corps. Signing him does not mean we're done...not by a long stretch.

Wilson is a 3rd or 4th receiver. We need an elite receiver out of THIS draft.

buddha 03-26-2015 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 11403390)
Would much rather have Lockett who is of the same build... not quite as fast, but I think he is the best route runner in the draft.

look what he does to Verrett
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JjJoSeQxAa0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BTW, I think Lockett is the most under valued WR in this draft. He's the real deal.

Saccopoo 03-26-2015 07:37 PM

Lockett runs routes. Poor man's Odell Beckham (due to the lack of "thickness" but the guy can absolutely work a route tree and make cornerbacks his bitch).

Lockett would be absolute balls in this system.

Dorsett is a fly pattern only dude with questionable hands.

We've already got a thick build track guy in Albert Wilson.

Lockett over Dorsett all day long.

OldSchool 03-27-2015 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11405401)
Lockett runs routes. Poor man's Odell Beckham (due to the lack of "thickness" but the guy can absolutely work a route tree and make cornerbacks his bitch).

Lockett would be absolute balls in this system.

Dorsett is a fly pattern only dude with questionable hands.

We've already got a thick build track guy in Albert Wilson.

Lockett over Dorsett all day long.

I'd like Lockett more if his hands weren't so dang small.

Dorsett will be a better pro.

kccrow 03-27-2015 07:06 PM

I'm really warming up to Chris Conley out of Georgia. He was a combine all-star, yes, but he does quite a few things really well despite playing in a run-heavy scheme. He is a real sleeper. The things I loved about Jordan Matthews, who I pounded the table for relentlessly, show up with this Conley kid. If he can be had in round 4, where I just took him in the mock, I think its a great value v. risk type of pick.

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11405401)
Lockett runs routes. Poor man's Odell Beckham (due to the lack of "thickness" but the guy can absolutely work a route tree and make cornerbacks his bitch).

Lockett would be absolute balls in this system.

Dorsett is a fly pattern only dude with questionable hands.

We've already got a thick build track guy in Albert Wilson.

Lockett over Dorsett all day long.

Not true. Dorsett can run the hitches and crossers that KC enjoys, and the speed must be respected. No doubt, Lockett's route precision is superior.. but Dorsett is also a very solid and dynamic option for the Chiefs. He also holds up better against physical corners than does Lockett.

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 11407123)
this Conley kid. If he can be had in round 4, where I just took him in the mock, I think its a great value v. risk type of pick.

absolutely. :D

O.city 03-27-2015 07:11 PM

So for you guus that are changing opinions on guys now, does that mean your opinions were wrong just based on their on field play?

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407135)
So for you guus that are changing opinions on guys now, does that mean your opinions were wrong just based on their on field play?

Put some names into your accusations?

O.city 03-27-2015 07:15 PM

I'm not accusing anyone of anything. I'm just curious what the movement of guys at this point is based on?

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407149)
I'm not accusing anyone of anything. I'm just curious what the movement of guys at this point is based on?

Just don't care to read through many of pages to determine who you refer to, but okay.. if you don't want to go there, no problem.

O.city 03-27-2015 07:20 PM

It was just a general statement.

Over the years I've just put less and less into the combine.

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407163)
It was just a general statement.

Over the years I've just put less and less into the combine.

That's fair. For me, it's just an interesting thing to consider for the bizarre results. Conley runs that fast... worth taking another look. Dawson runs slow? check his games again. Just something to make sure the early impressions hold or are something to reconsider.

kccrow 03-27-2015 07:28 PM

I haven't really liked many of the receivers "less" per say, I just don't value them as highly round wise based upon certain factors like size and speed. Also have watched more tape on some other guys.


I don't like Justin Hardy in rounds 1 or 2 anymore because he measured at barely 5'10" instead of at his over 6'0" that he was listed in college. That's a huge difference in terms of where you think a guy can play in the league. That size difference coupled with the fact he ran 4.56, that's big. Now I can't think of him as an outside guy, a #2. I basically have to think of him as a slot only, and that's probably fair based on revisiting his tape too.


A guy like Chris Conley, I had really watched much of him, but after seeing him run at the combine it made me go back and look for the guy on tape. He stands out, he's a good receiver. He's a guy I might not have really been all that aware of until he posted great numbers.

Another guy, he looks good on tape and runs like dog shit, and that's the kid from Fresno State, Josh Harper. Now instead of liking him somewhere on day 2, he's probably a 4th, 5th, maybe 6th round guy. You go back to the tape on a guy like that, and you start nitpicking the separation issues a little more.

I still like a few guys a bunch. I like Devin Smith. I like Stefon Diggs. I still like Breshad Perriman and Jaelen Strong. I like Tre McBride.

I still don't like some guys like Sammie Coates and DGB. I've probably dropped Vince Mayle quite a bit. I was higher on him than draft boards early on. I don't know if I like a 4.65 40. I like to see 4.55 or better and then like a good 3-cone and short shuttle.

O.city 03-27-2015 07:31 PM

Did anything he did on the field say hardy couldn't play outside? If not, I don't see how his size or straight line speed have anything to do with it.

When you start using those metrics to determine where or how a guy can play, you miss out on good football players.

kccrow 03-27-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407183)
Did anything he did on the field say hardy couldn't play outside? If not, I don't see how his size or straight line speed have anything to do with it.

When you start using those metrics to determine where or how a guy can play, you miss out on good football players.

Huge difference between NFL corners and NCAA corners. That's why people who say "College team A could be NFL team Z" sound so stupid. You get it O. Yes, Hardy can separate well on quick routes, on tape didn't show great deep speed but thought maybe it was adequate. He runs 4.56 and is 5'10". NFL corners on the outside are 6'0" and run 4.45. He's not going to beat those guys. They are going to stick to him deep, they are going to stick to him on curls and hooks. He isn't going to get those high point catches outside his frame like he did in college against longer NFL corners. He's got to be matched up correctly.

O.city 03-27-2015 07:43 PM

Thats just too cookie cutter for me. "Corner x in the nfl will do this etc".

Acceleration in and out of breaks, route running, etc, there's just so much more to it than speed and measurableS.

Hardy is a really good football player Though. If we can pick him, he'd be a good player for us.

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 11407190)
Huge difference between NFL corners and NCAA corners. That's why people who say "College team A could be NFL team Z" sound so stupid. You get it O. Yes, Hardy can separate well on quick routes, on tape didn't show great deep speed but thought maybe it was adequate. He runs 4.56 and is 5'10". NFL corners on the outside are 6'0" and run 4.45. He's not going to beat those guys. They are going to stick to him deep, they are going to stick to him on curls and hooks. He isn't going to get those high point catches outside his frame like he did in college against longer NFL corners. He's got to be matched up correctly.

Not so sure of this. Hardy's 40 time doesn't concern me all that much... depending on the refs you get week to week. Out of near all WR prospects, where Hardy shines is his scrappy nature. His hand fighting is top-shelf... and he can find a way to separate.

I didn't love his size, and that does hurt a bit. I have him as an early 4th, but that's not so much his fail as it is a really thick WR class of talent. KC can draft him in rd 3, and I wouldn't at all be upset.

Some dudes just are not proficient in the precise mechanics of the 40.

kccrow 03-27-2015 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407194)
Thats just too cookie cutter for me. "Corner x in the nfl will do this etc".

Acceleration in and out of breaks, route running, etc, there's just so much more to it than speed and measurableS.

Hardy is a really good football player Though. If we can pick him, he'd be a good player for us.

Oh, I haven't stopped liking Hardy, what I've changed is how soon and where I expect he can make a living in the NFL. I have him as a guy I'd have to consider the board in the 2nd round, I don't think I'd take him there but maybe. Depends on the WR run and how I'd view his availability going into the 3rd. I don't see him making it out of round 3. I like him a bunch as a slot and have called him a prototype at that position.

kccrow 03-27-2015 07:53 PM

BTW the guys that make a big impact in this league at under 6' at WR on the outside aren't guys that don't run in the 4.4's. Just sayin. I have written about short receivers and how they are valuable, but speed does matter when there are other elements lacking. Doesn't mean a guy can't make a living in the league. Wes Welker, Julian Edelman, those guys aren't fast. That doesn't mean they don't catch a shitload of balls, but it also doesn't mean they primarily operate outside.

O.city 03-27-2015 08:01 PM

Hardy just seems like a guy that will inevitably get pushed down due to measurables, get drafted with a chip on his shoulder, work his ass off and be a mother fer for years.

Or he could bust. Lol

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407220)
Hardy just seems like a guy that will inevitably get pushed down due to measurables, get drafted with a chip on his shoulder, work his ass off and be a mother fer for years.

Or he could bust. Lol

ah, but the fun of the draft. Just never can be so sure. :)

kccrow 03-27-2015 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407220)
Hardy just seems like a guy that will inevitably get pushed down due to measurables, get drafted with a chip on his shoulder, work his ass off and be a mother fer for years.

Or he could bust. Lol

:) I think he gets pushed down due to positional fit because of measurables. That'll I'll say. Same reason Tyler Lockett isn't going to go in the first round. I don't think either one is going to fail. I think Hardy will be damn good. I just can't see him being on the outside. Put him set back off the line and let him use his agility to beat corners on slants, ins, outs, etc, without a jam. He's perfect for a West Coast team needing a slot guy. Hell, maybe a team does try him outside as an X and it might work in a horizontal system.

RunKC 03-27-2015 08:33 PM

Hardy ran a 4.4 at his pro day. He's going to be a steal just like Keenan Allen was

O.city 03-27-2015 08:34 PM

Positionally at this point, the Chiefs need an X to go with Maclin. It sucks because one of the top two guys (Cooper and White) would be good fits, but I think Parker would be an ideal fit with that big body he's got. I'm more intrigued with DGB doing it, but with all the stuff around him, who knows.

I'm afraid alot of the guys that will go later like Dorsett and Lockett, are going to end up being a little liek you say, slot only guys.

Devin Smith is pretty interesting in that he could be very Desean Jackson ish.

Sandy Vagina 03-27-2015 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11407281)
Positionally at this point, the Chiefs need an X to go with Maclin. It sucks because one of the top two guys (Cooper and White) would be good fits, but I think Parker would be an ideal fit with that big body he's got. I'm more intrigued with DGB doing it, but with all the stuff around him, who knows.

I'm afraid alot of the guys that will go later like Dorsett and Lockett, are going to end up being a little liek you say, slot only guys.

Devin Smith is pretty interesting in that he could be very Desean Jackson ish.

think you may just be surprise... :D

planetdoc 03-28-2015 10:08 AM

more info on Maclin which IMO hints at what the chiefs like in wrs
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...e16375109.html
Quote:

“Obviously he’s a player who can get behind the secondary, something we really haven’t had the last several years,” Hunt said. “He’s a player that Andy was familiar with and maybe even more important, Jeremy’s familiar with Andy and our offense, so he’s somebody that should ... be effective sooner. He’s another player who is great in the locker room, and finally, Andy thinks he’s one of the best route runners he’s ever had at the position.

Saccopoo 03-28-2015 02:10 PM

Tre McBride.

I'm not shitting you. The best guy in this draft for this system. I'd pull the trigger on him in the second round.

OldSchool 03-29-2015 02:28 AM

Anyone know much about this kid? Just read about his pro-day, from Pitt State, same school that John Brown came from. He looks really natural at catching the ball and tested really well.

Quote:

Gavin Lutman was a bit of an unknown to scouts as he was unable to attend junior timing day a year ago while Pittsburg State figured out his eligibility. On the field in 2014, Lutman produced 70 receptions for 1,196 yards and 13 scores.

At today's workout, Lutman turned heads with his testing numbers. His measurements were 6-3, 214 pounds, and he then went on to touch 36 inches in the vertical jump, 10-5 in the broad jump and time 4.46 seconds in the 40. Lutman's 3-cone drill was a swift 6.65 seconds and, he was timed at 4.09 seconds in the short shuttle.

Scouts were evidently beside themselves as to not even ranking Lutman through the season. Compared to Jon Brown, the former Pittsburg State star coming off to a tremendous rookie campaign in the NFL, scouts say Lutman, though slower, has a size advantage and is more natural catching at the ball.
Read more at http://walterfootball.com/proday.php...0x1ilPIa1C4.99
http://www.hudl.com/athlete/578512/h...s/217301382/v2

Quite a few good & intriguing big-bodied prospects this year who can be had in the mid-late rounds.

smith11 03-29-2015 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 11407704)
more info on Maclin which IMO hints at what the chiefs like in wrs
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...e16375109.html

but from what ive read on CP all the chiefs receivers the past couple years can get behind defensesLMAO

OldSchool 03-29-2015 05:30 PM

Quote:

Football Outsiders' Playmaker Score disappointingly ranks WR Dorial Green-Beckham as the No. 13 receiver in the class and offers Jonathan Baldwin and Yatil Green as similar historical prospects.
We'll allow FO's Nathan Forster to explain. "Playmaker Score sometimes has trouble with players like Green-Beckham, who had limited college action and thus are less likely to produce a sample size sufficiently meaningful to forecast their futures," Forster wrote. "However, Green-Beckham was not particularly impressive in either of his two seasons of college football." Indeed, DGB had only had only 883 receiving yards during his sophomore season, the most productive of his two campaigns, even though Missouri passed 414 times that year. As Forster pointed out, L'Damian Washington (893 yards) was actually the team's No. 1 receiver that year: "In contrast to Green-Beckham's high draft grade this year, Washington went undrafted in 2014 and has been kicking around various practice squads. Granted, Washington didn't run a 4.49 40-yard dash at 6-5, 237 pounds, but the point is that Green-Beckham's lack of elite production is a red flag in our model."
Man, looks like some of you were right in comparing him to Baldwin.

RunKC 03-29-2015 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11408021)
Tre McBride.

I'm not shitting you. The best guy in this draft for this system. I'd pull the trigger on him in the second round.

I'm a huge fan of this kid


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.