Not bad, not bad at all.

Strange to see Danna go for this much this late in free agency. I figured his market was half that by now.

Last year, several players, and Spags, called Danna the unsung hero of the defense.

This is nice. He's a very solid piece on that DL.

I like him but what is the bro getting paid?

Just tells you how important he is to Spags and the defense. Danna is an unsung hero in my opinion.

A certain someone probably didn't develop how they'd hoped up to this point so they brought Danna back to start.

Just for kicks, I compared Danna's stats last year to any of Frank Clark's years in KC and I'd be interested to see anyone try to say, after the same comparison, that this isn't a pretty darn good deal in relation.

5 years and 63 million guaranteed versus 3 years and 13 million guaranteed? Jesus, folks, seek help if you think the Chiefs overpaid.

Why would you measure against a contract that was flat out horrible?

You talking smack on FAU?

He's just now a sophomore, I'm good if the braintrust wants to ensure stability there

Yeah but they're not giving this contract to Danna just to be depth. And I'm pretty sure they expected FAU to develop faster than he did. No one drafts a player in the 1st round expecting them to be a healthy scratch in the playoffs.

He's made some flash plays nearly every time he's been on the field, as little as it's been.

I'm not saying he's God's gift to football or anything, only that I find it a bit ridiculous that one of the first reactions people are having to being 3-deep at DE is, "Well, one of them must be sucking ass..."