In a way you are right, thinking that the Liberals are ever going to get their way when it comes to guns is absurd and arguing with them about it is playing to what they want and that is to keep it in the headlines, sorta like when they trotted those kids out at the Superbowl as human props to promote their agenda.

This sarcasm?...

Nope. The last 2+ pages are about gun control, as you predicted.

Good lord you are stupid. Let me explain. You want to tell ME the main point and reasoning of a violent man who is out killing people based on a rambling manifesto he wrote. So in fact, you are the one who is trying to reason with a psycho. That is, you are the one who is trying to understand why he is doing what he is doing. You are, after all, telling me you know more about the "suspect" and his "motive" based on a lengthy manifesto that says a lot of different things.

I'm telling you that this suspect has MOTIVES, as in plural. As in more than one. And due to his rather high view of himself, it's really presumptuous of YOU to tell ME what is the MAIN GOAL of this guy's rampage. I'm saying he has, and follow me on this because it's a big word, an AGENDA.

You do need a time out. You need a time out to figure out what you are talking about becuase I don't think you even realize just how idiotic you look.

:clap:

Thought you were out? I mean more than usual of course.

This would make sense if the sole thing he actually stated clearly in his manifesto wasn't:

"The question [singular, not plural] is, what would you do to clear your name?"

...at the beginning of the ****ing thing. That's his primary objective. Everything else is conjecture.

I am not trying to "reason with a psycho", I am simply going off the clearly stated premise at the beginning of his manifesto.

Everything else is noise that can be construed to fit an agenda.

:whackit:

Look, you're angry. You feel betrayed. The Broncos played not to lose and that's exactly what beat them. We get it.

Lighten up. Get a massage or something.

:D

lol, fair enough. My point is that a lengthy manifesto usually means that whoever wrote it has many issues he/she wants to address. It's generally an indication of an agenda. If this guy wants everyone to understand him, going on a killing rampage is not the way to do it. His manifesto is simply a precurser to an agenda which he will try to enact however possible. Be it revenge against the LAPD and social change on a larger scale.

All I'm saying is this will be another arrow in the quiver of the gun control people in DC. I've tied it into the fact that it's irony of irony that the majority of these shooters who have used guns to kill people are Democrats or lean to the leftist agenda. I'm just pointing this stuff out.

What was the question he posed at the beginning?:D

Why should this be special?

The inner city poor have been killing each other for DECADES.

Now that some white people get shot a black president has a problem with it?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb...jzijo1_400.gif

And why have we been ignoring their liberal cries for gun control?

I heard Piers Morgan has a huge inner city following, as well.

That's it.

I'm racist...

Inner city supports gun control because it makes them less likely to be shot