ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Poop Brooke Pryor Sucks Ass Thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=321858)

FringeNC 07-11-2019 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14343071)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There was no one to request it from, Angie - we didn&#39;t know who supplied it to KCTV, nor do we know who gave it to Carrington. We didn&#39;t know what was on the missing minutes of the tape until yesterday.</p>&mdash; Jeff Rosen (@jeff_rosen88) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeff_rosen88/status/1149023399836037120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 10, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Is this guy's denial likely to be true? Wasn't Brooke Pryor in contact with the Espinals? If so, wouldn't Brooke have asked for a copy of the tape?

rabblerouser 07-11-2019 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14343129)
Is this guy's denial likely to be true? Wasn't Brooke Pryor in contact with the Espinals? If so, wouldn't Brooke have asked for a copy of the tape?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14343071)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There was no one to request it from, Angie - we didn&#39;t know who supplied it to KCTV, nor do we know who gave it to Carrington. We didn&#39;t know what was on the missing minutes of the tape until yesterday.</p>&mdash; Jeff Rosen (@jeff_rosen88) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeff_rosen88/status/1149023399836037120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 10, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So, why did Angie Ricono state in April that the unaired parts have 'intimate details, names of others, and them talking to security", and why did she say it was "not newsworthy"??

Jeff Rosen is LYING

LoneWolf 07-11-2019 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 14343131)
So, why did Angie Ricono state in April that the unaired parts have 'intimate details, names of others, and them talking to security", and why did she say it was "not newsworthy"??

Jeff Rosen is LYING

Jeff Rosen works for the KCStar. Ricono works for KCTV5. Not completely ludicrous to think the Star didn’t have the entire audio.

DaFace 07-11-2019 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 14343161)
Jeff Rosen works for the KCStar. Ricono works for KCTV5. Not completely ludicrous to think the Star didn’t have the entire audio.

I feel like this whole thing is too complicated for people to follow. :shake:

rabblerouser 07-11-2019 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 14343161)
Jeff Rosen works for the KCStar. Ricono works for KCTV5. Not completely ludicrous to think the Star didn’t have the entire audio.

Then it's Rosen's fault for not requesting it before he sent his minions out on hit pieces.

OnTheWarpath15 07-11-2019 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 14343294)
Then it's Rosen's fault for not requesting it before he sent his minions out on hit pieces.

There's no way in hell that KCTV5 is going to give the full audio to a competing media outlet.

With that said, The Star shouldn't be writing stories on his presumed guilt when they knew they didn't have access to all the information.

Mecca 07-11-2019 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 14343382)
There's no way in hell that KCTV5 is going to give the full audio to a competing media outlet.

With that said, The Star shouldn't be writing stories on his presumed guilt when they knew they didn't have access to all the information.

Not to mention in all of their pieces and radio appearances they gave this look that they had so much more information...

Halfcan 07-11-2019 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14343096)
Yet people thought they had it because they acted like they had all this info no one else had....you guys made that bed.

Exactly, I think they figured more bad stuff would keep coming out about Reek and they could claim they had prior knowledge of it for a scoop.

"See I told you that I had more damning info, and here it is!!"

Now they are crying up a storm-"We didn't have all the facts- TV 5 ****ed us!"

They all bet Red on the Roulette table but it came up Black!

007 07-11-2019 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 14343416)
Exactly, I think they figured more bad stuff would keep coming out about Reek and they could claim they had prior knowledge of it for a scoop.



"See I told you that I had more damning info, and here it is!!"



Now they are crying up a storm-"We didn't have all the facts- TV 5 ****ed us!"



They all bet Red on the Roulette table but it came up Black!

No the bet on green. One slot.

RINGLEADER 07-11-2019 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14343071)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There was no one to request it from, Angie - we didn&#39;t know who supplied it to KCTV, nor do we know who gave it to Carrington. We didn&#39;t know what was on the missing minutes of the tape until yesterday.</p>&mdash; Jeff Rosen (@jeff_rosen88) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeff_rosen88/status/1149023399836037120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 10, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This is just ludicrous.

Basic rules of sourcing in journalism:

1. Does the source have some kind of axe to grind?

2. Do you have all the facts necessary to form your reporting?

It is clear the tape was made by Espinal without Tyreek’s knowledge to benefit her position. Heck, they reported at the time that it was an “insurance policy.” No way could they not have known it was not a slanted piece of evidence.

It is also clear from Ricona’s reporting that the tape was aired incomplete. They took the word of a fellow journalist that it was materially complete but then formed their opinions based on her false and incorrect representation.

They can now try to hide behind “we didn’t know” all they want. It was crap reporting and they know it. The more the KC media tries to circle the wagons the more inept they look.

I’ve seen better reporting from YouTube influencers.

ptlyon 07-12-2019 05:46 AM

Anybody cake then leave this bitches ass and break her heart yet?

FAX 07-12-2019 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 14344595)
Anybody cake then leave this bitches ass and break her heart yet?

Have you perused a photograph of that Tub o' Guts she married, Mr. ptlyon?

That dude ain't leaving anybody anytime soon. He may not be able to walk.

FAX

ptlyon 07-12-2019 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14344617)
Have you perused a photograph of that Tub o' Guts she married, Mr. ptlyon?

That dude ain't leaving anybody anytime soon. He may not be able to walk.

FAX

Have not. So there's a scrabble for the last helping of mac n cheese?

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-12-2019 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14344617)
Have you perused a photograph of that Tub o' Guts she married, Mr. ptlyon?

That dude ain't leaving anybody anytime soon. He may not be able to walk.

FAX

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 14344672)
Have not. So there's a scrabble for the last helping of mac n cheese?

You know where those two are headed? Heart disease and death.

Hammock Parties 07-18-2019 07:31 PM

LMAO

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Bets on level of access Chiefs give you?</p>&mdash; The Mahomes Era (@MahomesWatch) <a href="https://twitter.com/MahomesWatch/status/1151668749612830727?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Bachelorette has about as much reality in it as your reporting. Stay away from the Chiefs.</p>&mdash; pennywiserekt (@pennywiserekt) <a href="https://twitter.com/pennywiserekt/status/1151910691130843136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.