ROFL, I'm glad you were concerned enough to go back and edit your post.

Reading is a struggle for you, then?

If it's down to 4 and they are spending so much time with Geno in KC...he has to one of the 4, right?

Fixed it just for you little girl. When i was talking about flacco i did put some in there. So suck a dick

Nope just looking at some of those QBs. The main point is the past decade. Thats where the NFL is and will be. You need a franchise QB. Comprehending is a struggle for you apparently

Ya he is. Where on the list of 4 he is that is the question.

I'd say so.

Obviously not, given that I've brought facts and you've brought nothing but G. Smith's perfectly clean balls, while you keep trying to change the argument.

I've brought up facts about the past decade and how it correlates to 1st rd QBs and SB wins.

Question for you: Did Geno **** your wife or something?

You're really mean.

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by exposing your argument appeared that a neanderthal wrote it. I promise if you don't write any more completely moronic things, I won't hurt your feelings again. Pinky swear!

Why would you ask that when he's clearly got you under his scrotum?

Pinky swear if you only shoot yourself in the face

You obviously hate the guy. Im a Geno supporter so that makes me all over his nuts? Please bitch. Get over yourself

You're fairly aggressive.

Also, this post + what you've been saying about Dane all week is beyond hilarious.

or a trade down with the Eagles

Because Dane's attacked me first and always is a prick to people. Did ya see what he said to Bosschief and GoChiefs?

I don't hate Smith. If the Chiefs are sold on the guy, they should take him. If they're not sold, they shouldn't. It's that simple. Taking the guy because the Chiefs haven't done it in a long time is the sort of dumbass shit that a ballhugger like you might be into, but it doesn't help the team in the long run.

So that excuses you for telling me to shoot myself in the face?

LMAO

Well we will all enjoy this team keep taking retread QBs. Now ive always said im fine with the trade just want to draft a QB for the future too

These fights on CP are entertaining, although it's best when the Jags fan tries to argue about the Chiefs and then says we're boring. LMAO

Yup sure why not. Im not even serious. Its a message board. We all say shit on here

ROFL.

I treat people here on the BB or in real life the same when it comes to courtesy.

It's a shitty excuse to be an asshole when someone is acting like a jerk on a forum to say "it's just the internet".

Im not usually a jerk. Sometimes ill say ah **** it. But im not usually like that

Or you draft his replacement now.

When you get sick of his bullshit in two years, then you've got a new guy who's had time to adjust to the pros.

And if he unprecedentedly becomes what Drew Brees was for New Orleans, then who the **** cares? You've got a franchise QB. Trade Geno, take the loss, either way it doesn't matter. You've got the franchise QB and are ready to kick some ass.

I don't see how this plan is a terrible idea.

Shhhhh...there is no reasoning on this planet. Thats what ive been saying. Draft a future QB. We have the chance to take the best one whomever they deem fit.

My point was never take a guy to take the guy. My point is take the best QB prospect while we have the chance. We hire a supposed QB guru. Lets take a shot. We havent in 30 years

:spock:

So.... Your point is to take the guy.

Take the best guy in this draft yes. Who knows who is coming out next year and where we'll be draft position wise

Its better than making at best a lateral move from OT Albert to OT draft prospect. Theyre not as safe as some experts think.

LMAO

So, as I've been saying, this is about you hugging Geno's nuts. You don't care if they're sold on him. You want them to take a shot, as you put it.

Geno will be the best QB prospect available to us for the next 5 years, lock him up so we don't have to worry about the QB position for another decade hopefully. We don't need Joeckel or Fisher, keep Albert and draft a RT in the 3-4th round if you're concerned about tackle play. I'd be a fan of Dion Jordan, if we can't trade or don't pick Geno, I'd be happy with a versatile pass rusher.

Geno's the best guy in this draft. Nothing to do with "hugging his nuts". If they take him theyre sold on him. They have to be somewhat sold on him if theyre bringing him in for a visit. Might be a smokescreen to drum up interest

You must really love Geno's nuts because that's all you talk about :thumb:

That's because it's a great ****ing idea. When you don't have a lights-out, franchise QB, your first, last, and only ****ing job every year should be to swing for the fences to find one. Once you find one, then I'll get all hot and bothered by the awesome fat guys you draft and free agents you sign.

It's got everything to do with hugging his nuts. You're curling up with them like a Friday night date.

Teams bring in players that they have no intention of drafting.

What if the Chiefs decide that Manuel is going to be the best QB in the long run, and they draft him. Are you going to be alright with that?

Were the Ravens 100% sold on Flacco? Were the Steelers 100% sold on Roethlisberger? Were the Packers 100% sold on Rodgers?

Drafting QBs is just as much a faith thing as it is a scouting thing. Andrew Lucks almost never ****ing happen. If there's the slightest possibility that your coaching staff can work with a guy and make him into something great, you gotta go get him.

Carl was 100% a QB atheist, if you could call it that. He even said so himself. He hated rookie QBs and the stress it took to play them and watch them struggle and work through their transition to the pros. Pioli was a dumbass who didn't feel comfortable with anybody who wasn't a ****ing sycophant.

We've finally got the QB coach we've always needed in KC. If he thinks Geno has stuff, it's gotta happen.

Well, your posts are really ****ing stupid, and they're based entirely on "GENO!", with no attempt at thought.

Yes completely. I like Manuel. If he's there in the 3rd sure. I know teams bring in guys for just visits thats it

My posts are stupid because I want this franchise to take the best QB prospect in this draft?

I dont feel like bringing up stats and getting into an all out debate right now. Ive stated my reason and there's nothing wrong with it

None of them were taken at #1, or even in the top 10. However, the Ravens traded down, and then traded back up to get Flacco, and the Packers had the luxury of letting Rodgers ride the pine for years while they fixed any problems and developed him.

I agree.

That's the sort of thinking that gets you JaMarcus Russell.

If they're confident Geno is the guy, they should take him, and not worry about A. Smith's ego. If they're doubtful, they shouldn't, unless they're doubtful about every other player in the draft, as well. You don't draft a player just because you haven't drafted the position in a long time.

Your posts are stupid for the reasons I've laid out. You were wrong about SB QBs, even as you kept changing the arguments, you weren't being truthful about not caring about a specific QB, and so on.

The different between KC and the Jamarcus Russell pick is we have a good talent evalting department and competent coaching staff and QB guru.

Im not changing argument about SB QBs. Ive argued that elite QBs have won them the past like 10 to 15 years. Not the past 40 years of QBs. Thats like trying to say oh a dominating 85 bears D will win a super bowl now. Not really. Its a passing league, you need a franchise QB to win and a good enough defense

Seriously, why do you waste your time here? A mind like yours should be designing the rocket we use to fly to Mars.

Since Mcnabb, Reid's drafted Feeley, Hall, Kolb, Kafka Foles. How is that very good?

**** off man

Of course you are. I showed you that you were wrong about the QBs, so you changed the timeline, twice.


Again, since Elway's retirement (that was a running team by then, and TGSOT came the next season), the numbers have been fairly even. They've actually been more even recently than they are if you go in the other direction. 8:6 is a closer breakdown than 30:17 and closer than 22:11.

Youre talking about ****ing QBs from the 70s. Doesnt even matter now. Its a different league. Thats been my argument you need an elite QB to win a SB

That looks like the shit you get when you draft QB's in rounds that aren't #1.

When did 1999 become a part of the '70s?

When did Dilfer and Johnson, or even Eli and Flacco, become elite QBs?

When you brought up QBs from that era.

Exactly thats been my point. You win SBs now a days with 1st round QBs

As I said, your posts are really ****ing stupid. I've pointed out, multiple times, the 1999-2012 seasons are an 8:6 split.

Ya it doesnt matter with Dawson, Plunkett, Griese, Bradshaw and Namath right now. Its a completely different league.

Read the last two sentences of that post, dumbass.

Flacco, Eli and Peyton, Ben, Rodgers winning. The elite QBs. Ill take my chance on the best QB prospect in this draft.

Ill take Geno and have him behind Alex. That way if Alex cant get it done, Andy can give him his chance.

But you're getting Joeckel :)

Again you don't have an actual argument.

Brady, Johnson, Brees, Warner winning. Non-1st round QBs.

It's not the round a QB is taken in that makes him elite (Dilfer, elite?). It's what he does in the league.

You're just a GENO! ballwasher. It's as basic as that.

1) Chocolate Penî
2) Choco Dawg
3) Blaksnake Swingin', and
4) Geno Moreno

There's your four. Been that way since day one.
Posted via Mobile Device

Remember how devastated you were when you guys got Alex and you knew the Geno dream was dead?

I'm glad I get to see you relive that :)

Brady, Warner were a stroke of luck and you know that. Johnson had a HOF defense. Brees yes a good 2nd round pick. No im not a Geno ball washer. If Barkley was the number one QB prospect id want him. I want the best QB prospect this regime thinks is the best

He IS talking about recent QBs. Is English your second language or something?

It was my bad he had the list of all QBs.

And the 1st round QBs winning recently outweigh the non 1st rounders. You dont win

Im on a pain pill for this mother****er of a headache ive had all day give me some ****ing slack

Alex Smith is a 1st rounder. You guys are set.

The funny thing is if a respective team's scouts and FO miss out one of the elite QBs that went on later in the draft heads should be rolling for not picking that great/HOF caliber player in the 1st.

After seeing the recent SB winning 1st round QBs i dont know why you wouldnt want to trust your QB proven coach to draft the best prospect.

If you trust the QB proven coach to draft the best prospect, then you won't be mad if he doesn't take a QB at #1, right? Because you trust him as a proven QB coach, so he must know if a QB is worth taking at #1, right?

Enjoy whatever scrub-assed punk bundle of sticksgsonville picks up to co-star on "Building With Blaine". You know, the forthcoming sitcom on NFLN this year?
Posted via Mobile Device

Possibly, but the chances increase if its a 1st rd QB. The stats recently are in favor of it. If not a first round QB its really hard. Warner and Brady were picking straws out of a hat

Yep, and FO personnel decision makers should be fired for missing out on one of those guys unless they already had a Franchise QB.

I'm going to sip on a glass of your tears as I watch you change your avatar :)

Kind of agree with that but those are 2 tough evaluations. They are paid to get it right. KC doesnt matter they never got it right or tried recently

Its Geno or Death, and Im much too young, swingin', and pimpish to cash in my chips just yet. Welcome to KC, Choco Dawg.
Posted via Mobile Device

ROFL

I feel like you are way too white to be talking like that.