ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Still looks like a Sutton Defense... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=324646)

oldman 08-24-2019 10:40 PM

We would have stopped them on the 1st series if it wasn't for a holding call. The run defense is much better. That's what killed us last year.

BossChief 08-24-2019 11:25 PM

The defense swarmed to the ball and there weren’t as many missed tackles as we have grown accustomed to. So, that’s nice.

If he can stay healthy, Chris Jones is going to have a massive season. That dude did whatever he wanted to do out there. It was great to see. He looks improved from an already dominant player.

This team is going to win the super bowl.

suzzer99 08-24-2019 11:39 PM

The most important thing go to me is Spags clearly understands how you beat Tom Brady in big games - you gamble and hope your guys get there.

The fact that we have Mahomes makes a gambling defense soooooo much more of a good strategy. Think about it - late in the game if we gamble and lose - quick score, defense not exhausted, and maybe we can score last. If we gamble and win - game over.

Sutton was a master at setting up his defense to give up the slow, clock-eating, soul-destroying drive late in the game. No big plays though! He was such a pussy when it came to any kind of blitz or gambling defense. He kept pretending he had '85 Bears talent, and was too old to adapt. His defenses played not to be embarrassed.

Nickhead 08-25-2019 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 14408406)
The most important thing go to me is Spags clearly understands how you beat Tom Brady in big games - you gamble and hope your guys get there.

The fact that we have Mahomes makes a gambling defense soooooo much more of a good strategy. Think about it - late in the game if we gamble and lose - quick score, defense not exhausted, and maybe we can score last. If we gamble and win - game over.

Sutton was a master at setting up his defense to give up the slow, clock-eating, soul-destroying drive late in the game. No big plays though! He was such a pussy when it came to any kind of blitz or gambling defense. He kept pretending he had '85 Bears talent, and was too old to adapt. His defenses played not to be embarrassed.

but yet even avoiding embarrasment, that backfired :thumb: :D

WhiteWhale 08-25-2019 12:24 AM

Long season,but I think people around here are expecting too much from this defense. If they're not in the bottom 1/3 of the league I'll be surprised. Just don't be in the bottom 3. Yanno?

suzzer99 08-25-2019 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 14408427)
but yet even avoiding embarrasment, that backfired :thumb: :D

As it usually does.

Bigmod 08-25-2019 12:47 AM

Yeah, it doesn't seem like a big improvement.

FAX 08-25-2019 01:34 AM

I saw nothing tonight from the 1st team that reminded me of Sutton's defense. Except, of course, for the fact that Sorensen was very active and near the action most of the night (and certain obvious elements of the pass defense).

There was no Dee Ford or Justin Houston, but I can't say they were particularly missed. It did seem a little strange that Scandrick and Nelson weren't grabbing guys downfield all night. In fact (while the 1s were on the field), I think the only defensive holding call we got was on a backer who tugged the tight end's jersey as the enemy was making his primary cut.

The run game defense looks improved (again, just talking about the 1s here) while the coverage was generally poor (which was the only stark similarity I perceived). Pick plays and the short-to-intermediate throws remain problematic, apparently. One would hope that the communication on the back end would be better.

Overall, I think it's fair to say that the defense plays with a noticeably different (and improved) attitude. The fact that Honey Badger wasn't on the field is important to remember.

If we can fix the communication problems among the backs and backers, we'll know more. As of now, however, I see no reason to compare this outing to the defense we fielded last season. We may be worse or we may be better, but (other than blown coverages and our difficulty dealing with intermediate crossers) we are not the same.

FAX

TEX 08-25-2019 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigmod (Post 14408456)
Yeah, it doesn't seem like a big improvement.

The 1st team run defense sure does.

petegz28 08-25-2019 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14408465)
I saw nothing tonight from the 1st team that reminded me of Sutton's defense. Except, of course, for the fact that Sorensen was very active and near the action most of the night (and certain obvious elements of the pass defense).

There was no Dee Ford or Justin Houston, but I can't say they were particularly missed. It did seem a little strange that Scandrick and Nelson weren't grabbing guys downfield all night. In fact (while the 1s were on the field), I think the only defensive holding call we got was on a backer who tugged the tight end's jersey as the enemy was making his primary cut.

The run game defense looks improved (again, just talking about the 1s here) while the coverage was generally poor (which was the only stark similarity I perceived). Pick plays and the short-to-intermediate throws remain problematic, apparently. One would hope that the communication on the back end would be better.

Overall, I think it's fair to say that the defense plays with a noticeably different (and improved) attitude. The fact that Honey Badger wasn't on the field is important to remember.

If we can fix the communication problems among the backs and backers, we'll know more. As of now, however, I see no reason to compare this outing to the defense we fielded last season. We may be worse or we may be better, but (other than blown coverages and our difficulty dealing with intermediate crossers) we are not the same.

FAX

Excellent points, Fax. I just see a lot of not getting off the field which I guess is what gives me flashbacks of Sutton. Especially conversions over the middle. Everyone knows the LB spot this year is questionable. I do think they are different from a speed and attitude perspective and as I said in the OP, the run D looks better.

UChieffyBugger 08-25-2019 06:52 AM

Imo until MO and HoneyB are starting and getting regular snaps, we won't be able to see the defense at it's full potential. Those two are vets who have seen everything the NFL has to offer and that experience will be vital to how far this defense can go. The run D and pass rush looks very decent imo so we just need the secondary to at least perform at an average to decent level.

kcclone 08-25-2019 07:17 AM

People have to understand improvement won't happen overnight. This will be a work in progress, and what counts is where we are by the time the playoffs start.

If we're better against the run (which early indicators say we are), and have a decent pass rush (Clark, Okafor, Jones and Kpass should be good), we'll be better overall than last year and get a few more stops. That's what we need.

I'm not expecting the 85 Bears' D. I am expecting a top 15 defense by the playoffs.

mcaj22 08-25-2019 07:37 AM

The defense looks like an actual NFL defense this year. Not elite, but not a a dumpster fire either. Just a typical NFL defense. Last year was BAD. I think people are forgetting how bad that forecast looked this time last year.


-Scrambling for Scrandrick around this time.
-People still were hoping Eric Berry was going to return early in the season (LOL)
-They begged Ron Parker to come back AND HAD TO START HIM even though everyone on Earth knew he was done/terrible
-Sorenson broke his thigh.

The whole thing really revolved around "Oh Berry will be back, early, week 3, then week 6, then week 9, then maybe playoffs." This time last year he was "Day to Day"

Just like the Colts did now with Luck. "Oh it's just a calf issue, we are optimistic for week 1." Oh really, you are.

You don't have any of that this year with this defense. Your prized FA high paid cornerstones are all healthy and PLAYING. Once they all start flying around and figure it out they will be okay.

kcclone 08-25-2019 08:08 AM

Honey Badger >>>>> Berry

Thornhill > Lucas

Breeland + Mo Claiborne > Nelson/Scandrick

Frank Clark + Okafor >>>> Houston/Ford (against the run)

Frank Clark + Okafor = Houston/Ford (pass rush)

Hitchens in 4-3 > Hitchens in 3-4

Spaggs > Sutton

Kpass in 4-3 >>>>> Kpass in 3-4



I really am expecting significant improvement as the season goes on. What matters the most is how these guys play once January begins.

O.city 08-25-2019 08:16 AM

I think we need to change our lens here in terms of what we’re seeing the defense or what we think the defense needs to be.

This is an offensive juggernaut and the franchise is built around the offense. They aren’t going to be nor do they really need a dominant defense. It’s just not gonna happen.

But, they’re trying to really develop a different defensive mindset which is the beat thing they could do. Play fast aggressive physical football.

They aren’t gonna be the 85 bears. That’s fine. Force turnovers, get some stops and be aggressive

If you give up some scores, shit happens


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.