The easiest way would be Frank Clark not sucking and coming anywhere close to earning that contract. He's still 27, even if he looks 37.
Otherwise, you're looking at next year's draft and/or free agency. |
Clearly DE is a position that Chiefs need to address after this season. Had they kept their first rounder this year, I thought there was a better chance at them selecting a DE at 31 than a LT.
What the Chiefs have is an opportunity for our young guys to emerge, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Let's see what we have, and with Daly, I'm confident our rookie will get a chance to show us what he's got. A free agent DE makes a ton of sense, I'm confident that Bart isn't satisfied with what he has. |
and with today being the first day that FA signings don't impact the comp formula I expect to see something soon.
|
Quote:
"Who will play that position when he's gone, though?" Anybody. I don't care. Veach cut both bookend OTs of the past 5 seasons in a single 24 hour period. We seem to be doing just fine at that position. |
Quote:
We strong, have good grammar That how I think we fix de |
Quote:
Clark needs to step up or GTFO after this season. His contract allows them to cut bait so he needs to prove his worth. They'll be fine. |
Quote:
He might as well not even be on the roster at this point because he's not dependable enough to even be on the field. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sleeping on Danna, dawg.
|
Seriously, dumbest grammatical thread title I've seen in a good while...
|
I mean, we almost certainly get a vet, Ingram seems the most likely given he already visited.
You might even want to try and get him on a 2 year deal, to massage the cap and knowing you probably need a bridge next year too especially if Clark gets cut. |
Quote:
|
I think Danna will be the starter and I’m perfectly fine with that. He’s stout against the run
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.