ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fire Bob Sutton (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=310950)

ARROW2 10-20-2017 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13167461)
Our problem last night was not Alex Smith.

Whatever dude. If he was the truth, we win.

FringeNC 10-20-2017 09:03 AM

The last two games, we've played two of the better O-lines in the league, and have been dominated. Dominated might not even be a strong enough word. They were dominated last year in the playoff loss, and dominated the year before in the loss at NE.

It's really hard to know whether it is talent or scheme. For instance, why last year were we able to get pressure on Carr?

Another interesting thing: Look how much better Buffalo's defense is after abandoning the Rex Ryan scheme we run.

The big issue is that unless our offensive line improves a good deal when healthy, it's hard to see us winning shoot-outs in the playoffs, when we will be facing good offensive lines that will dominate this defense.

TEX 10-20-2017 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13167461)
Our problem last night was not Alex Smith.

I've told him that several times. It's his narrative though...:shrug:

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 10-20-2017 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13167472)
So put Sorensen in that role, and let Houston rush.

That's ****ed.

Because Sorensen has proven to be a sure tackler in space.

TEX 10-20-2017 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 13167498)
The last two games, we've played two of the better O-lines in the league, and have been dominated. Dominated might not even be a strong enough word. They were dominated last year in the playoff loss, and dominated the year before in the loss at NE.

It's really hard to know whether it is talent or scheme. For instance, why last year were we able to get pressure on Carr?

Another interesting thing: Look how much better Buffalo's defense is after abandoning the Rex Ryan scheme we run.

The big issue is that unless our offensive line improves a good deal when healthy, it's hard to see us winning shoot-outs in the playoffs, when we will be facing good offensive lines that will dominate this defense.

No, it's easy really easy. Its BOTH. LACK of talent and reerunED scheme.

Hammock Parties 10-20-2017 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy won the toss (Post 13167500)
Because Sorensen has proven to be a sure tackler in space.

Carr isn't running that ball in.

The Franchise 10-20-2017 09:07 AM

There are any number of ****ing players on that team that should be in that position instead of Houston. It is ****ing stupid to put your $100 million dollar passrusher as a ****ing spy at the end of the game.

DanT 10-20-2017 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13167279)
This isn't a Bob Sutton problem. It's a player problem.

It's not Sutton's fault that DJ is done and can't move like he used to (God it hurts saying that).
It's not Sutton's fault that Justin Houston can't get pressure on a backup RT.
It's not Sutton's fault that Parker, Mitchell and Sorenson all were right there by Crabtree, knew it was going to be a deep pass, and still couldn't defend it.
It's not Sutton's fault that Peters is a ****ing moron that headlocks guys downfield to give up a 40+ yard DPI for a first and goal.
It's not Sutton's fault that our DB's are in position but not capable of defending a deep pass.

This is a player problem.


I agree. Not only were our DBs positioned to make plays, we had multiple DBs positioned to make plays on the same passed ball. That tells me the scheme is good, but the players are not playing as well as NFL DBs need to play when given an opportunity. It also tells me that the Raiders receivers played well.

Countering my argument, one could argue that instead of having extra players in coverage, we should be blitzing more. That may be true, but I would need to see a detailed argument that takes into account the relative quality of our pass rushers and the Raiders pass protectors.

Coaches are supposed to put players in position to make plays, but it is up to the players to make them.

oldman 10-20-2017 09:07 AM

Nelson can't get back soon enough, Gaines flat out sucks. I don't care if Hali took a dump on Andy's desk, activate him. Dee Ford is just not getting the job done.

Eleazar 10-20-2017 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 13167510)
Nelson can't get back soon enough, Gaines flat out sucks. I don't care if Hali took a dump on Andy's desk, activate him. Dee Ford is just not getting the job done.

PFF tweeted after the game that on Oakland's 61 pass plays, the Chiefs got pressures from:

Dee Ford - 7 plays
Justin Houston - 6 plays
Chris Jones - 5 plays
All others combined - 0 plays

ChiefGator 10-20-2017 09:17 AM

I am liking the Dorsey firing more and more. We are way to thin at DB and our CB's are really not that good. We have been sticking with some of this project players hoping they would suddenly get better, but they have shown over and over ( looking at you Gaines ) they can't. We need a #1/#2 type CB, to push Mitchell down onto the #3 or #4 WR. That is where he will shine.

Gravedigger 10-20-2017 09:27 AM

If these performances are any indicator of our Defensive prowess I have a tough time believing he'll keep his job at the end of the season. If Andy is that loyal, which we know he can be, then they better go OLB pass rush beast, ILB/Safety, and CB in the draft. Those are the four positions we need to shore up in the offseason without a doubt.

RunKC 10-20-2017 09:33 AM

One major thing I blame on Sutton is the disguise. He had a few good blitzes that worked effectively, but there was very little pressure put on Carr, which is really weird because everybody knows that Carr folds under pressure.

From what I saw last night, it was simple execution that failed. It's unreal that our DB's can't defend deep passes.

DanT 10-20-2017 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13167565)

From what I saw last night, it was simple execution that failed. It's unreal that our DB's can't defend deep passes.

Exactly. I was upset with the DBs early in the game for not looking for the ball, but later they showed me that I shouldn't have been upset with them for that, because whether they are looking at the ball or not, at least one of the offensive players in the area is going to catch the ball anyway. :)

The Franchise 10-20-2017 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13167565)
One major thing I blame on Sutton is the disguise. He had a few good blitzes that worked effectively, but there was very little pressure put on Carr, which is really weird because everybody knows that Carr folds under pressure.

From what I saw last night, it was simple execution that failed. It's unreal that our DB's can't defend deep passes.

Then that's also on Sutton for not doing anything about it.

Romo brought it up last night on that last drive but our defense was easy as **** to defeat.

Two deep safeties? Throw to the middle of the field.

Safety creeping up? Throw it deep.

oldman 10-20-2017 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 13167525)
PFF tweeted after the game that on Oakland's 61 pass plays, the Chiefs got pressures from:

Dee Ford - 7 plays
Justin Houston - 6 plays
Chris Jones - 5 plays
All others combined - 0 plays

It's not just about pressures, it's all-around performance. He doesn't defend the run and hits like a Volkswagen Beetle. Crap, they don't even have to hold him.

Chris Meck 10-20-2017 09:44 AM

Too many receivers running free all game long. The contested plays were bad, but that's what really killed the Chiefs.

I don't know why we don't zone blitz more, like Pittsburgh has always done. You still have to pressure the QB somehow. If you're going to drop Houston, blitz a safety.

When does Hali come back?

PAChiefsGuy 10-20-2017 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 13167588)
Too many receivers running free all game long. The contested plays were bad, but that's what really killed the Chiefs.

I don't know why we don't zone blitz more, like Pittsburgh has always done. You still have to pressure the QB somehow. If you're going to drop Houston, blitz a safety.

When does Hali come back?

Hali is eligible to play next week if we want him to and I am pretty sure he could have played this game. I have no idea what is going on there.

ILChief 10-20-2017 09:57 AM

If the opposing team gets close to midfield, they should just chuck it to the end zone every play. Our db's have proven last night and vs Houston that they will either give up the TD or get flagged for PI most of the time

mlyonsd 10-20-2017 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 13167620)
If the opposing team gets close to midfield, they should just chuck it to the end zone every play. Our db's have proven last night and vs Houston that they will either give up the TD or get flagged for PI most of the time

This was discussed during the game by Mitch and Kendall. They were amazed at how many times Carr just basically threw it up for grabs.

BoneKrusher 10-20-2017 10:39 AM

I thought Greg Robinson was our DC last two weeks.

Ken Bone 10-20-2017 10:41 AM

Fire Sutton and hire Tony Romo.

Best22 10-20-2017 11:02 AM

Chargers have a much better defense than we do

DanT 10-20-2017 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 13167740)
I thought Greg Robinson was our DC last two weeks.

I didn't get to see the Pittsburgh game on TV. (Had to listen to it on the radio.)

The Raiders game, though, did not seem to me to be like a Greg Robinson defense, which were notable to me for how often Chiefs players in the front 7 were positioned so that they could be easily blocked away from the point of attack. Robinson's schemes were some of the worst I've ever seen from the Chiefs in that regard. Sutton's schemes are not like that. He puts players right at the point of attack. It's just that we have some replacement-level players in our regular lineup, and they aren't making plays. That's the way I see it, at least. I'm not an expert on defensive schemes, just a causal fan who's watched over 40 years of Chiefs football and who played high school ball on the offensive line.

notorious 10-20-2017 11:07 AM

At least Robinson's defense created turnovers. This defense can't even accomplish that!

MahiMike 10-20-2017 11:09 AM

Where's the gofundme link?

DanT 10-20-2017 11:13 AM

Losing Berry was a big loss. The Raiders exploited our DBs, but we also have other weaknesses on D. Our beloved Derrick Johnson has lost at least a step, if not two.

If we can't shore up the defense for December and January, we'll need an even more explosive offense, We have the skill players on offense to be explosive, though our O-Line is not all that great.

All and all, I think the Chiefs could win some games in January, but this team is not one that is liable to make me feel all sad and disappointed. If you don't have the horses, you don't have the horses. I'm not one to blame refs and coaches, especially after rooting for the Chiefs over a nearly five-decades long trophy drought. The organization is fairly mediocre. They ain't Royal. That's for damn sure.

Easy 6 10-20-2017 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 13167013)
It's the unknowns that we have to wait on. I got to imagine Reid is just fuming over this. He wouldn't admit it publically of course. That's not him to call out players or coaches. But Sutton needs his ass chewed and to realize that they aren't going to be able to find a starting CB to replace Mitchell through trade or whatever. They can't expect Murray to just become Berry and play TE's so well man to man. Same with Sorenson. Bailey and Jones could use a breather a few more snaps a game with Nacho and Jenkins rotating. Passongo needs some ****ing snaps. He's raw yes. But he isn't going to get better with maybe 5 snaps on D so far this year while being active every one of them. The plan with him was most likely having him as the emergency OLB until Tamba or Dadi come back. In the mean time why not get him some reps as an inside rusher or wide 9 rush end in situations where he wouldn't have coverage responsibility? The best time to do that is if they are up 2 scores but they haven't had that much so I can see not trusting him yet. Gaines needs benched/cut but until Nelson is healthy Bob has to adjust. I would say Pettine would be someone who would work best with Bob in a senior defensive assistant role and he did hangout and watch some practices like I mentioned. Either way Sutton needs some help cause he's obviously not adjusting.

I dont disagree with anything you say here, Bob clearly lacks imagination

BlackOp 10-20-2017 12:07 PM

What happened to bringing the pressure when you have a late lead and the opponent is deep in their own territory? This has been a staple of Sutton's defense. They had the Raiders at 2-20 and knew he would have to hold the ball for the WRs to get downfield.

Carr is an inaccurate passer when he's getting rushed....

Hammock Parties 10-20-2017 12:14 PM

lol here's another one on that same drive

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMmbu3KVwAALtvi.jpg:large

Eleazar 10-20-2017 12:18 PM

he is a linebacker. He's not going to blitz on every down.

Best22 10-20-2017 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 13167990)
he is a linebacker. He's not going to blitz on every down.

3-4 OLB almost always bring pressure

He's not an ILB like Johnson, who may blitz once or twice agame

BoneKrusher 10-20-2017 12:29 PM

I just can't understand why you pay $50 million to Houston and keep him back in coverage.

Red Dawg 10-20-2017 12:31 PM

I can't either. Houston on 3rd or game on the line should be after the QB every time.

It's plain stupid any other way.

ILChief 10-20-2017 03:11 PM

How often does Von Miller drop into coverage?

penbrook 10-20-2017 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 13168339)
How often does Von Miller drop into coverage?

Very rarely. When the game is on the line he rushes all the rime

The Franchise 10-20-2017 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13167982)
lol here's another one on that same drive

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMmbu3KVwAALtvi.jpg:large

Sutton rushes three. You're sure to get pressure when two out of your three passrushers can be double teamed. All it takes is the OT to hold off Ford (who sucks) and Carr has all day to pick apart the secondary.

Maybe Peters was onto something for getting in Sutton's face.

GloryDayz 10-20-2017 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13167279)
This isn't a Bob Sutton problem. It's a player problem.

It's not Sutton's fault that DJ is done and can't move like he used to (God it hurts saying that).
It's not Sutton's fault that Justin Houston can't get pressure on a backup RT.
It's not Sutton's fault that Parker, Mitchell and Sorenson all were right there by Crabtree, knew it was going to be a deep pass, and still couldn't defend it.
It's not Sutton's fault that Peters is a ****ing moron that headlocks guys downfield to give up a 40+ yard DPI for a first and goal.
It's not Sutton's fault that our DB's are in position but not capable of defending a deep pass.

This is a player problem.

Good coaches motivate players and know when to cut them from the roster too. Bill Belichick does it best, because he's tough and nothing is personal other than winning. And Sutton needs to be that for the defensive side of the roster, or retire. Lord know Andy won't ever be Bill.

GloryDayz 10-20-2017 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Bone (Post 13167746)
Fire Sutton and hire Tony Romo.

Rep!

Willie Lanier 10-20-2017 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13168354)
Sutton rushes three. You're sure to get pressure when two out of your three passrushers can be double teamed. All it takes is the OT to hold off Ford (who sucks) and Carr has all day to pick apart the secondary.

Maybe Peters was onto something for getting in Sutton's face.

Have Sutton's schemes been perplexingly stupid at times?

Yes, but everyone needs to calm down and quit the "we're imploding" narrative...

I'm just enjoying the ride until it's Patrick Mahomes turn...

(And in no way is that a slight towards Smith, he has been balling this year)

ToxSocks 10-20-2017 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Lanier (Post 13168373)
I'm just enjoying the ride until it's Patrick Mahomes turn...

(And in no way is that a slight towards Smith, he has been balling this year)

Ditto.

Hammock Parties 10-20-2017 03:45 PM

And on the next page of Bob Sutton's playbook...the 11-man drop.

dannybcaitlyn 10-20-2017 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 13167972)
What happened to bringing the pressure when you have a late lead and the opponent is deep in their own territory? This has been a staple of Sutton's defense. They had the Raiders at 2-20 and knew he would have to hold the ball for the WRs to get downfield.

Carr is an inaccurate passer when he's getting rushed....

Believe they converted a 4th and 21 also. Dropped eight still got burnt.

BoneKrusher 10-20-2017 03:57 PM

Could he fire him like Yesterday?

Best22 10-20-2017 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn (Post 13168407)
Believe they converted a 4th and 21 also. Dropped eight still got burnt.

2nd and 20

4th and 11

PHOG 10-20-2017 04:18 PM

Sutton is STILL around? Get rid of the bum.

RaidersOftheCellar 10-20-2017 04:40 PM

My brother has been pounding the "NFL=WWF" line for a long time and I've always made excuses.

Maybe it's time to consider the possibility that these guys aren't just clueless idiots?

Not sure what's worse to be honest. Manipulation or the realization that the people making your team's (and most others') decisions are buffoons.

Hammock Parties 10-20-2017 06:13 PM

GROB SUTTON

https://i.imgur.com/O0UIxz9.jpg

TEX 10-20-2017 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Lanier (Post 13168373)
Have Sutton's schemes been perplexingly stupid at times?

Yes, but everyone needs to calm down and quit the "we're imploding" narrative...

I'm just enjoying the ride until it's Patrick Mahomes turn...

(And in no way is that a slight towards Smith, he has been balling this year)

We'll be fine...:rolleyes:

Willie Lanier 10-21-2017 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 13168624)
We'll be fine...:rolleyes:

Was that a shot at me?

Just curious, I wasn't trying to defend the shit schemes Sutton is enforcing, but if you're trying to damper my belief that this team couldn't **** anyone up in the playoffs,

Well, bye gif

Chief Northman 10-22-2017 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13168604)

I knew it!

BlackOp 10-22-2017 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 13168464)
My brother has been pounding the "NFL=WWF" line for a long time and I've always made excuses.

Maybe it's time to consider the possibility that these guys aren't just clueless idiots?

Not sure what's worse to be honest. Manipulation or the realization that the people making your team's (and most others') decisions are buffoons.

I'm entertaining the idea that Reid/Sutton dropped this game to do the NFL a solid...to be be paid back later.They've been around long enough to know how this truly works. Not a single sack on Carr...Sutton knows this is how you beat him...that and disrupt the WRs off the line. None of that happened....its like he designed a game plan on how to lose to Oakland. Very bizarre....Houston cant beat a backup RT...even once?

Raiders have a few prime time games coming up and a loss would essentially make those meaningless. The wonky officiating/scheduling kind of supports this. The game vs. the Pats in Mexico is very important to the league masters. Their final 6-7 games are brutal...they arent making the play-offs.

I still believe KC has been green lighted...

Only158 10-22-2017 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13168370)
Good coaches motivate players and know when to cut them from the roster too. Bill Belichick does it best, because he's tough and nothing is personal other than winning. And Sutton needs to be that for the defensive side of the roster, or retire. Lord know Andy won't ever be Bill.

Just finished watching the CO/WSU game. Say/think/believe whatever you want about him but for my money the Pirate aka Mike Leach is a gosh darn flippin genius. He made his starting offense do up downs on the sidelines during a nationally televised game because....they had two consecutive three and outs. FLIPPING GENIUS!!!!! Little more of that in the NFL please???? BTW.... Craig James and his miniskirt wearing son are well....female dogs.

You feel me?

Baby Lee 10-22-2017 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 13166832)
Shit I wanted him gone after that Indy playoff game.

I first said it after the Indy game. Sutton is Tag Heuer, not Husqvarna.

He builds watches, not buzzsaws. The Ryan lineage builds buzzsaws.

Someone above alluded to it above, when all our premium talent is beasting it's a masterpiece.

But pull a few key pieces out and you might as well have a friendship bracelet on your wrist, rather than a $5K Swiss timepiece.

It's a variation on Alex's major limitation. Alex executes the things he understands as well or better than anyone, but is a post when presented with novel information.

Similarly, Sutton designs a mighty defense when he has everyone he wants at his disposal, but when asked to improvise and fill holes, his plans go wonky.

Baby Lee 10-22-2017 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13166887)
Carr had a hurt back. Why the **** do you not blitz him early and often and get hits on him? ****ing pathetic.

Particularly since this has been his Achilles in our previous games against hi, even when healthy.

Carr is the rattlingest QB in the game today, reminds me of when we'd crush the souls of the likes of Jeff George, and we gave him a lifetime to make decisions.

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 13168010)
I just can't understand why you pay $50 million to Houston and keep him back in coverage.

$50M???

2016-Houston’s 444 pass-rush attempts ranked sixth in the NFL among outside linebackers, and his pass-rush percentage of 74.9 ― the percentage of times he rushed the passer per passing snap played ― ranked 34th among players at his position.


anyone find these for 2017?

Chiefs Moon 10-22-2017 06:55 AM

The defense is soft and that's on Sutton. When players embrace "bend but don't break," it's over. They are ok with getting rolled between the 20's. That's not the mentality of a championship defense. We don't force turnovers, and when turnovers are possible, we don't have DB's with ball skills-- especially now that EB is out. Peters is the lone ball hawk, but he's unwilling to tackle. Ford is a joke against the run and DJ has noticeably slowed. The mentality is all wrong to overcome where talent is lacking.

chiefzilla1501 10-22-2017 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 13170378)
I first said it after the Indy game. Sutton is Tag Heuer, not Husqvarna.

He builds watches, not buzzsaws. The Ryan lineage builds buzzsaws.

Someone above alluded to it above, when all our premium talent is beasting it's a masterpiece.

But pull a few key pieces out and you might as well have a friendship bracelet on your wrist, rather than a $5K Swiss timepiece.

It's a variation on Alex's major limitation. Alex executes the things he understands as well or better than anyone, but is a post when presented with novel information.

Similarly, Sutton designs a mighty defense when he has everyone he wants at his disposal, but when asked to improvise and fill holes, his plans go wonky.

This defense looked outstanding last year without mauga, barely a Poe, third string DEs, Houston, and with Mitchell as our #2 cb. They imploded after they lost DJ but what defense could have survived with the shitstain ilbs we ended the season with. His defense is banged up every year. A few years back, he ran a solid defense without Berry or DJ, and with Sean Smith as our #1 cb and we were so banged up that Gaines and even Parker had to play #2 cb. It's bs that Sutton is only good when he has star players.

For whatever reason, our defense this year isn't working. I hope it gets fixed. But let's not pretend Sutton was incompetent from the start. Our defense has carried this team the past 4 years.

PAChiefsGuy 10-22-2017 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13168354)
Sutton rushes three. You're sure to get pressure when two out of your three passrushers can be double teamed. All it takes is the OT to hold off Ford (who sucks) and Carr has all day to pick apart the secondary.

Maybe Peters was onto something for getting in Sutton's face.

I give Sutton credit for this strategy the first couple wks. It worked well against the Pats and Chargers and it was OK against the Redskins and Eagles but clearly teams have adjusted. Time to scrap the whole rushing 3 and only do it on rare occasions. It does not work..

The posters saying 'fire Sutton' that would be stupid at this point.. Sutton is a good coach. He is well respected throughout the league.. He will adjust... Still plenty of time left for the D to improve. No guarantee it will but no guarantee it won't either. Suttton has had plenty of success here. There is time for him to fix things and make adjustments...

Typical CP flip flop... 'Alex Smith only has a good record because of the team surrounding him... Our defense held Steelers to 18-pts..' Our defense looks bad this year 'Fire Sutton.. He sucks!' Well if he sucks then clearly Smitty deserves a lot of credit for winning... Which is it?

You guys crack me up...

chiefzilla1501 10-22-2017 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Moon (Post 13170404)
The defense is soft and that's on Sutton. When players embrace "bend but don't break," it's over. They are ok with getting rolled between the 20's. That's not the mentality of a championship defense. We don't force turnovers, and when turnovers are possible, we don't have DB's with ball skills-- especially now that EB is out. Peters is the lone ball hawk, but he's unwilling to tackle. Ford is a joke against the run and DJ has noticeably slowed. The mentality is all wrong to overcome where talent is lacking.

It was a really interesting adjustment. The whole rush 3 thing. It was a brilliant adjustment to account for spread, quick strike, pick play offenses. But he has to make the counter adjustment and I'm glad it's getting exposed now vs later. First of all, we have to get a million times better at timing the jump ball. I don't subscribe to the idea that we have to blitz more, but we have to get much much better at creating pressure.

Sutton made in game adjustments in Pitt to bring a bigger defensive front in, which carried over to Oakland. So it looks like he's trying to make adjustments. He just hasn't found the right one yet. We'll see what he does after 11 days to plan for Oakland. Hopefully he sees tape of the siemian debacle last year and figures out a way to stop the pass.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Only158 (Post 13170349)
Just finished watching the CO/WSU game. Say/think/believe whatever you want about him but for my money the Pirate aka Mike Leach is a gosh darn flippin genius. He made his starting offense do up downs on the sidelines during a nationally televised game because....they had two consecutive three and outs. FLIPPING GENIUS!!!!! Little more of that in the NFL please???? BTW.... Craig James and his miniskirt wearing son are well....female dogs.

You feel me?

Up-Downs during a game. Wow...

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Moon (Post 13170404)
The defense is soft and that's on Sutton. When players embrace "bend but don't break," it's over. They are ok with getting rolled between the 20's. That's not the mentality of a championship defense. We don't force turnovers, and when turnovers are possible, we don't have DB's with ball skills-- especially now that EB is out. Peters is the lone ball hawk, but he's unwilling to tackle. Ford is a joke against the run and DJ has noticeably slowed. The mentality is all wrong to overcome where talent is lacking.

Great post.

And the O-line is in the same mentality boat as the D. They are weak ****s who probably couldn't start on many other winning teams.

Rausch 10-22-2017 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 13166214)
That is all.

...

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/...819020913[

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13170453)
Great post.

And the O-line is in the same mentality boat as the D. They are weak ****s who probably could start on many other winning teams.

That's not true.

RunKC 10-22-2017 09:13 AM

Time to admit the players are being soft pussies who can't cover routine deep passes, including Marcus Peters.

Not scheme when a routine deep pass is completed or players are not in position to defend and draw DPI.

Worst part is they know it's a deep pass. They literally see it coming and suck. Happened vs Washington, in the garbage time Hail Mary's in Houston and now when we ****ing know the Raiders have to pass deep.

Bad tackling, bad angles, bad position. That's on the players.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 13170408)
I give Sutton credit for this strategy the first couple wks. It worked well against the Pats and Chargers and it was OK against the Redskins and Eagles but clearly teams have adjusted. Time to scrap the whole rushing 3 and only do it on rare occasions. It does not work..

That's one of our coaching staff's biggest problems, they stick to a system that's not working until it causes too much damage.

Quote:

The posters saying 'fire Sutton' that would be stupid at this point.. Sutton is a good coach. He is well respected throughout the league.. He will adjust... Still plenty of time left for the D to improve. No guarantee it will but no guarantee it won't either. Suttton has had plenty of success here. There is time for him to fix things and make adjustments...
I'm not sure it's stupid, it's a sign of frustration with clearly clearly seeing what our coaching staff appears to not see. We can get into the whole "we don't have the personnel to change, or at least not change on the fly" debate, but this team's answer to every terrible performance is, "we'll learn from this." Then they don't seem to. It might be simpler to say, "I'm not going to take that question."

Quote:

Typical CP flip flop... 'Alex Smith only has a good record because of the team surrounding him... Our defense held Steelers to 18-pts..' Our defense looks bad this year 'Fire Sutton.. He sucks!' Well if he sucks then clearly Smitty deserves a lot of credit for winning... Which is it?
I'm thinking we'd like some balance. Alex is going to suffer criticism because we suffered 4 years of inaccuracy, turtling, and checking down. He's seeming showing us a different Alex now that they drafted a QB. Well he did for five games. Few think it's a coincadink. But the true balance would be having a D-line that could get pressure, while having an O-line that's can block, and BDs that aren't almost guaranteed to give up 10-15 yards in 4 downs. All in the same year.

Quote:

You guys crack me up...
As much as the D and O-line crack us up? :D

How about a head coach who knows when to hand off play calling to somebody else?

Aspengc8 10-22-2017 09:16 AM

Its a combination of breakdowns in fundamentals, and untimely bs penalty calls. Despite the bad calls, KC had mutiple chances to force a punt, and even end the game, if a solid tackle was made. A basic ****ing fundamental. DB’s trying to tackle high and getting driven back 5 yards, linebackers arm tackling or completely whiffing below the knee. Defensive lineman not getting off blocks. Its not a scheme issue, its a do your job issue.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13170495)
That's not true.

I fixed it..

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 09:22 AM

Lack of basic fundamentals (pass protection, tackling, pressure on Carr) made our defense responsible for not putting the game away.

Alex should have had another TD to put the game away as his "should have been" interception doesn't count except on paper.

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13170516)
I fixed it..

You're still wrong , if not just on principal:D:D:D

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13170527)
You're still wrong , if not just on principal:D:D:D

I said our O-line is weak and couldn't start on other winning teams? Are saying they're strong (obviously compared to other O-lines on winning teams)?

RunKC 10-22-2017 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13170523)
Lack of basic fundamentals (pass protection, tackling, pressure on Carr) made our defense responsible for not putting the game away.

Alex should have had another TD to put the game away as his "should have been" interception doesn't count except on paper.

Offense scored 30 points noob. They did their job

ping2000 10-22-2017 01:36 PM

I will say this, Sutton is loved by offensive players throughout the league. I'm sure they send him gifts at Christmas.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ping2000 (Post 13170941)
I will say this, Sutton is loved by offensive players throughout the league. I'm sure they send him gifts at Christmas.

And other QBs send Andy gifts for the week off from getting hit.

jjchieffan 10-22-2017 02:09 PM

I don't get it. This defense has been borderline elite under Sutton. We've lost multiple key players and continued to be dominant. Now, all of the sudden he's forgotten how to run a defense? Something just doesn't add up.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 13171033)
I don't get it. This defense has been borderline elite under Sutton. We've lost multiple key players and continued to be dominant. Now, all of the sudden he's forgotten how to run a defense? Something just doesn't add up.

Evidently our next man up isn't working very well. And some of our first men up aren't very great either.

Marcellus 10-22-2017 02:22 PM

This thread is a great example of why fans dont run teams.

Sutton is frustrating at times but our defense has regularly won us games over the years with him as DC. He hasn't changed, some of the player have.

They will get better.

GloryDayz 10-22-2017 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 13171086)
This thread is a great example of why fans dont run teams.

Sutton is frustrating at times but our defense has regularly won us games over the years with him as DC. He hasn't changed, some of the player have.

They will get better.

We don't call it overreaction planet for nothing.

kcpasco 10-22-2017 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 13171086)
This thread is a great example of why fans dont run teams.

Sutton is frustrating at times but our defense has regularly won us games over the years with him as DC. He hasn't changed, some of the player have.

They will get better.

I hope so because the effort in the Oakland game was pathetic. I’ll blame it on being a Thursday game.

cooper barrett 10-22-2017 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 13170545)
I said our O-line is weak and couldn't start on other winning teams? Are saying they're strong (obviously compared to other O-lines on winning teams)?

With our center and guard injured the OL are doing a decent job. 2 of them aren't starters for us!!!!!! When there are weak players on the OL the whole line suffers. They are doing a good job for what they are. I don't see Alex11 leaving on a cart, do you? Strong, NO, weak, NO

I cannot understand why Fisher has hot and cold moments but overall he earns his participation award.


C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG
Alex Smith 25/36 342 9.5 3 0 1-11 84.9 127.3

36 passes and 1 sack Hmmm yeah they suck big time...NOT

FYI these Stats are misleading, they should have a TD removed and an INT added.

What did suck was the Defense and it's performance against the pass. They did contain the run as noted above but

29/52 417 8.0 3 0 0-0 84.6 101.2


Oakland ran 73 plays vs our 59.and neither team broke 100 yards rushing.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.