ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Brad Pitt & World War Z (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=254622)

Hammock Parties 06-16-2013 11:44 PM

Clocking in at 76% so far.

Glad it doesn't suck.

AphexPhin 06-17-2013 02:41 AM

Yeah while Im glad its getting good reviews, it sucks its a PG 13 movie. Thats a complete slap in the face to the book imo. oh well I may get around to seeing it.

Sure-Oz 06-17-2013 07:46 AM

This movie isn't even about the book except the name if I recall.

AphexPhin 06-17-2013 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 9756602)
This movie isn't even about the book except the name if I recall.

Then I'm definitely skipping it completely. May wait for Netflix. I'm just sick and tired of all of these watered down PG 13 films.

Bowser 06-17-2013 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AphexPhin (Post 9757111)
Then I'm definitely skipping it completely. May wait for Netflix. I'm just sick and tired of all of these watered down PG 13 films.

The PG-13 is definitely going to be a liability for this flick. Hell, The Walking Dead is more gruesome than PG-13.

mr. tegu 06-17-2013 01:55 PM

I am reallly excited for this movie and am curious to see their origin of whatever it is that caused the zombies as well as their characteristics.

Bowser 06-17-2013 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 9757122)
I am reallly excited for this movie and am curious to see their origin of whatever it is that caused the zombies as well as their characteristics.

Have you read the book?

mr. tegu 06-17-2013 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9757138)
Have you read the book?

Nope. I didn't even know it was a book until I saw it mentioned in this thread. :D

On a side note, I need to write a book because it seems they only make movies from books now. I am thinking a vampire love story with zombies. They will eat that up. In Twilight, did the books have blank pages to represent the long drawn out stares between characters? I need to learn the tricks of the trade.

Bowser 06-17-2013 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 9757151)
Nope. I didn't even know it was a book until I saw it mentioned in this thread. :D

Ha, gotcha.

As a stand alone movie, World War Z looks to be a decent big budget zombie action flick. As someone who has read the book the movie is named after, the movie looks to be a disaster, especially considering the PG-13 rating. I'll likely still see it, but my hopes are definitely NOT up for this one.

(And if you're any kind of zombie fan, pick up the book. Easy read and entertaining as hell. Do it after you see the movie, though...)

Ceej 06-17-2013 04:04 PM

Yup, still plan on seeing it.

Sure-Oz 06-17-2013 06:14 PM

If the movie gets above a 60% ill likely go see it for mindless fun.

Deberg_1990 06-17-2013 06:48 PM

It's got some decent reviews from a few top critics. I was surprised. I'll pass on it though until DVD. IMO, it's like zombie light for the masses.
Posted via Mobile Device

Fairplay 06-18-2013 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9757158)
Ha, gotcha.

As a stand alone movie, World War Z looks to be a decent big budget zombie action flick. As someone who has read the book the movie is named after, the movie looks to be a disaster, especially considering the PG-13 rating. I'll likely still see it, but my hopes are definitely NOT up for this one.

(And if you're any kind of zombie fan, pick up the book. Easy read and entertaining as hell. Do it after you see the movie, though...)



You do know that very rarely does a movie live up to a book.

Bowser 06-18-2013 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 9758745)
You do know that very rarely does a movie live up to a book.

Sure. My beef with WWZ is that from the trailers, it is a completely different story being told on screen than in the books. Hopefully the movie is great, but if it is, I doubt it will represent the book too much.

I guess I'm just a fanboy of the book?

notorious 06-18-2013 11:21 PM

I really want to see the scene from the book when the celebrities doing the reality show in a mansion get over run by people and zombies.


That would be an awesome movie scene.

AphexPhin 06-19-2013 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9759640)

I guess I'm just a fanboy of the book?

hey nothing wrong with that. The book is brilliant. It would of been cooler if a director like David Fincher (who worked with Pitt on Seven and Fight Club) would of directed a hard R version of the book. Oh well.

Rausch 06-19-2013 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AphexPhin (Post 9761920)
It would of been cooler if a director like David Fincher (who worked with Pitt on Seven and Fight Club) would of directed a hard R version of the book.

That would have kicked ass...

mr. tegu 06-19-2013 07:11 AM

74% on RT so far.

notorious 06-19-2013 08:03 AM

This is good news.

Sure-Oz 06-19-2013 08:43 PM

68 reviews at 75% on RT

"It's uneven -- and fans of the book may be annoyed by how thoroughly it diverges from the source material -- but World War Z still brings smart, fast-moving thrills and a solid performance from Brad Pitt to the zombie genre."

I may have to see this, i didn't expect this to land in the fresh area. I also didn't expect Man of steel to be rotten

Ceej 06-20-2013 09:17 AM

Here in Topeka they're having this movie show tonight at 8:00pm.

Interesting.

Ceej 06-20-2013 02:13 PM

Just got tickets for tonight's show.

Fairplay 06-20-2013 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9764372)
Here in Topeka they're having this movie show tonight at 8:00pm.

Interesting.



I've noticed that at a few movie theaters in Kansas City as well.

ThaVirus 06-20-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9765072)
Just got tickets for tonight's show.

Report back to thread for debriefing, soldier.

Ceej 06-20-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 9765349)
I've noticed that at a few movie theaters in Kansas City as well.

Is that normal?

I've seen shows at midnight, but not at 8 pm the day before it actually comes out.

Ceej 06-20-2013 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 9765354)
Report back to thread for debriefing, soldier.

I will tonight.

But, I've only read about half of the book, FWIW.

Fairplay 06-20-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 9765354)
Report back to thread for debriefing, soldier.



Don't give anything away though. Also when you leave the theater give your thoughts on how the audience liked or didn't like the movie as well.

Ceej 06-20-2013 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 9765377)
Don't give anything away though. Also when you leave the theater give your thoughts on how the audience liked or didn't like the movie as well.

I will be sure to use spoiler tags.

But, it is going to be hard to compare it to the book for me - since I've really only read ~1/2 of it or so.

Tribal Warfare 06-20-2013 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9765357)
Is that normal?

I've seen shows at midnight, but not at 8 pm the day before it actually comes out.

at Joplin they have dual showings at 8pm and 10pm tonight.

Ceej 06-20-2013 09:12 PM

Hmmmn....

Ceej 06-20-2013 09:44 PM

Again, I've not read the entire book.

So, here it goes:

Spoiler!

Deberg_1990 06-20-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9765357)
Is that normal?

I've seen shows at midnight, but not at 8 pm the day before it actually comes out.

Lately a few of the big summer movies have begun screening at 7 or 8PM the night before the official opening. It's to jack up the official Friday numbers and help generate excitement and interest.

mr. tegu 06-21-2013 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9766232)
Again, I've not read the entire book.

So, here it goes:

Spoiler!

Was it good? Can you give a spoiler free opinion?

Ceej 06-21-2013 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 9766763)
Was it good? Can you give a spoiler free opinion?

I think it was worth the price of admission. I enjoyed it all - but the ending seemed just thrown together.

Also:

Spoiler!

Fairplay 06-21-2013 02:20 PM

Alright just got back from watching the movie and here's my take.

And yes, I've read the book, the movie just borrowed the title of the book is about all it has in common. So quit reading this review if that is going to make you fuss and throw a tantrum and hold your breath until your face turns blue.


**** NO SPOILERS BELOW/SAFE TO READ ****

The movie is suspenseful and intense from the beginning but not very gory and bloody to get the PG-13 ratings. I never found the movie to lag it kept moving holding your interest. The casting of the main characters was solid, though most of them had relatively small parts outside of Brad Pitt. The acting was good throughout and the CGI I had no complaints with at all, impressive actually.

I like zombie movies in general and I think this one is up there with the best of them, with many more locations in this then holed up on a farm, at a Mall or an amusement park. Very pleased with the pace of the movie and it was sprinkled throughout with hoards of zombies attacking mercilessly the people of the world. The ending could have been better but was alright. Outside of this movie not being based on the book (almost an impossible task if you ask me) I would give it 4/5 stars. My perception afterwards to the audience leaving the theater were positive.

Al Bundy 06-22-2013 09:56 AM

No Imax on this in Kansas City?

mr. tegu 06-22-2013 01:23 PM

We saw this last night and really liked it. The entire audience seemed pleased and the movie received quite a few applauses at the end.

DanBecky 06-22-2013 01:27 PM

Heard so many good things about the book. I'd like to get my hands on it before seeing the movie

jiveturkey 06-22-2013 03:04 PM

I liked it. A sequel would be better positioned to follow the book but since they had so many issues with this one I'm guessing that part 2 isn't in the cards.

Nightfyre 06-22-2013 03:24 PM

I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, but I do love me some modern zombie takes. Love Walking Dead, 28 days series, Zombieland (of course). So take it fwiw.

Sure-Oz 06-22-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiveturkey (Post 9769050)
I liked it. A sequel would be better positioned to follow the book but since they had so many issues with this one I'm guessing that part 2 isn't in the cards.

If it makes enough money i dont see why not

Micjones 06-22-2013 05:05 PM

Good movie. Full of action and suspense. My only complaint is the open-ended conclusion, but clearly they're planning a sequel.
I said I wouldn't see this, but my son talked me into it (I'm not much for the whole zombie thing). I'm glad he did.

Deberg_1990 06-22-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 9768531)
No Imax on this in Kansas City?

No IMAX anywhere. It wasn't released in that format
Posted via Mobile Device

Al Bundy 06-22-2013 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9769350)
No IMAX anywhere. It wasn't released in that format
Posted via Mobile Device

Looks like it was released in IMAX in select international cities.

Al Bundy 06-23-2013 12:05 AM

This movie was really damn good.

mikeyis4dcats. 06-23-2013 07:56 AM

we liked it. never read the book. the fact that the airplane they were flying on kept changing from scene to scene from a C-130 to something else bugged the hell out of me though. Inexcusable for a production like this.

Ceej 06-23-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 9770057)
we liked it. never read the book. the fact that the airplane they were flying on kept changing from scene to scene from a C-130 to something else bugged the hell out of me though. Inexcusable for a production like this.

I didn't get how:

Spoiler!

ShowtimeSBMVP 06-23-2013 06:54 PM

Paramount's Brad Pitt zombie romp overcame critical advance publicity to open in second place with $66 million.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...#ixzz2X5gU7iOZ

kcchiefsus 06-23-2013 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9771029)
I didn't get how:

Spoiler!

Where did it say in the movie that was the case? Because those are the only two he saw that means they were the only two?

Ceej 06-23-2013 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 9771671)
Where did it say in the movie that was the case? Because those are the only two he saw that means they were the only two?

Spoiler!

alnorth 06-23-2013 09:28 PM

World War Z is not the best zombie movie ever, but it is a pretty good one. I was not disappointed.

alnorth 06-23-2013 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9771693)
Spoiler!

Spoiler!

Ceej 06-23-2013 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 9771715)
Spoiler!

Spoiler!

alnorth 06-23-2013 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9771723)
Spoiler!

Spoiler!

Ceej 06-23-2013 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 9771731)
Spoiler!

Spoiler!

Ebolapox 06-23-2013 09:45 PM

I liked the movie (aside from the fact that it really wasn't WORLD WAR Z), but I have a few bones to pick with the movie...
Spoiler!

Ceej 06-23-2013 09:48 PM

Goodness. I am glad I didn't overanalyze THAT much. But, alas, I've not read the entire book. So I can understand why WWZ bookies would probably be upset at the movie just using the name.

But, well said Ebola.

alnorth 06-23-2013 09:54 PM

I should also mention there is pretty much no gore at all. Its more grown-up than the usual zombie movie, older kids could probably watch it.

alnorth 06-23-2013 10:01 PM

Spoiler!
.

BWillie 06-23-2013 10:08 PM

Almost want to refuse to see it altogether because of this stupid zombie phenomenon that everybody thinks is so cool.

Ceej 06-23-2013 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9771779)
Almost want to refuse to see it altogether because of this stupid zombie phenomenon that everybody thinks is so cool.

Then don't see it.

Seems pretty simple to me.

alnorth 06-23-2013 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9771779)
Almost want to refuse to see it altogether because of this stupid zombie phenomenon that everybody thinks is so cool.

Forget that the other dumb zombie movies were ever made. This is the best zombie movie thats been recently made. Look at this one as "huh, a zombie apocalypse movie? Wow, I haven't seen a zombie movie in decades, how quaint! OK, sure why not" (exception: if you hated the old-timey "zombie classics" too, then forget it)

ThaVirus 06-23-2013 10:53 PM

Entertaining.

Micjones 06-24-2013 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9771779)
Almost want to refuse to see it altogether because of this stupid zombie phenomenon that everybody thinks is so cool.

That's exactly how I felt from the outset.
I only saw the film because my teenage son wanted to.

You don't have to be into the zombie phenomenon to appreciate the film.
If ANYONE isn't a zombie stan, it's me.

Go check it out. I'm glad I did.

mikeyis4dcats. 06-24-2013 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ebolapox (Post 9771741)
I liked the movie (aside from the fact that it really wasn't WORLD WAR Z), but I have a few bones to pick with the movie...
Spoiler!


again, Pitt wasn't trying to make a vaccine IMHO. His plan was to infect, likely with something curable or at a level that was survivable.

mikeyis4dcats. 06-24-2013 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 9772010)
That's exactly how I felt from the outset.
I only saw the film because my teenage son wanted to.

You don't have to be into the zombie phenomenon to appreciate the film.
If ANYONE isn't a zombie stan, it's me.

Go check it out. I'm glad I did.

as am I....I'm not a zombie fan, but my wife wanted to see it.

Ceej 06-24-2013 08:35 AM

FWIW:

http://ihorror.com/world-war-z-2-is-in-the-works/

Ebolapox 06-24-2013 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 9772080)

again, Pitt wasn't trying to make a vaccine IMHO. His plan was to infect, likely with something curable or at a level that was survivable.

here's the thing... I get the feeling that he was going into a BSL3 or 4 type of containment (rather, agents from those containments). nothing from the BSL0-2 would make you 'terminal,' as they are all TREATABLE. by definition, ANYTHING THAT WILL MAKE YOU TERMINAL HAS NO CURE (in general, we're not talking about cancer, we're talking about pathogens).

mikeyis4dcats. 06-24-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ebolapox (Post 9772279)
here's the thing... I get the feeling that he was going into a BSL3 or 4 type of containment (rather, agents from those containments). nothing from the BSL0-2 would make you 'terminal,' as they are all TREATABLE. by definition, ANYTHING THAT WILL MAKE YOU TERMINAL HAS NO CURE (in general, we're not talking about cancer, we're talking about pathogens).

I guess it's semantics, but there are plenty of terminal pathogens if they aren't treated. IMHO they were looking for something like bubonic plague which is terminal in most instances if not treated. Something that would allow them to fight and stop the spread.

Fire Me Boy! 06-24-2013 11:32 AM

http://s3.amazonaws.com/theoatmeal-i...cs/wwz/wwz.png

mikeyis4dcats. 06-24-2013 11:47 AM

haven't read the book, but not sure how people expected them to adapt it to a movie without creating a single protagonist.

frankotank 06-24-2013 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 9772483)
haven't read the book, but not sure how people expected them to adapt it to a movie without creating a single protagonist.

well....they could have made it a series of shorts, which would be like the book. you know it coulda been kinda like the creepshow movies.

oh well...I think I'm going tonight.
Ive worked with this one guy for over 20 years. if he hates a movie I usually like it and vice versa. welp....he hated it! :thumb:

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 01:56 PM

The word is that the studio completely overhauled the original ending at the last minute to one that would be more of a "audience pleaser"

Spoiler!

Deberg_1990 06-24-2013 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9772819)
The word is that the studio completely overhauled the original ending at the last minute to one that would be more of a "audience pleaser"

Spoiler!

It's been known for awhile they redid the original ending. That's why the release date got pushed back. I think it was supposed to open last Christmas originally. Anyhow, here's the original ending, and yes sounds like Matthew Fox had a bigger role.






Spoiler!

mikeyis4dcats. 06-24-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9773052)
It's been known for awhile they redid the original ending. That's why the release date got pushed back. I think it was supposed to open last Christmas originally. Anyhow, here's the original ending, and yes sounds like Matthew Fox had a bigger role.






Spoiler!

that really is a terrible ending. And explains why I was like "Wtf" when i saw matthew fox listed on IMDB.

Rausch 06-25-2013 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 9772483)
haven't read the book, but not sure how people expected them to adapt it to a movie without creating a single protagonist.

There was in the book.

Hell, they could have done it like they did Stand By Me or Fight Club. A narrator over some parts and mostly flashbacks...

notorious 06-25-2013 07:37 AM

They should have used a different title. At least it would leave the door open for a "True" World War Z movie.

No battle of Yonkers? :facepalm:

Fairplay 06-25-2013 11:10 AM

Sequel seems likely..........

http://hereisthecity.com/2013/06/25/...al-box-office/

World War Z earns sequel after gobbling up global box office

Brad Pitt zombie apocalypse movie World War Z, which has been mired in bad press and was predicted to be one of the year's biggest turkeys, is to get a shock sequel after storming the global box office at the weekend, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

Director Marc Forster's loose adaptation of the Max Brooks novel about the aftermath of a worldwide zombie pandemic took a highly impressive $118.8m (£77.3m). While it opened at No 2 in the US behind Pixar animated prequel Monsters University, the film's $66m (£43m) haul in the world's most profitable territory was the best for an original live-action movie there since Avatar. Studio Paramount said the film was now certain to get a followup.

Such comments allude to the extensive rewrite – reportedly of the entire 40-minute third act – undertaken by Lost creator Damon Lindelof after World War Z had wrapped for the first time last year. A Vanity Fair feature published in May suggested that Pitt and director Marc Forster were refusing to talk to each other on set by the end of production, and hinted at an amateurish approach that saw the film's budget balloon to a reported $400m. It is now widely accepted that the true figure is closer to $200m, though World War Z will still need to continue its impressive box-office run at some pace to have a hope of recovering its costs.

Pitt, who plays a UN worker torn between protecting his family and finding a cure for the zombie infection, hinted at a sequel during the film's Moscow premiere last week. "There is enough [material] to mine from the book," he said. "We could barely get a fraction of the book in [this movie]. So we'll see. We'll see."

frankotank 06-25-2013 11:55 AM

saw it last night.
I liked it. very much. it's very surprising the LACK of gore and blood. a good story doesn't NEED it...but imo could be enhanced with a little EWWWWW. the things they show on Walking Dead.....good GRIEF!!!! nothing like that in this movie. good flick.....good story.
I'm the king of knowing who some dude is in a bit part....and I TOTALLY missed that Matthew Fox was in this albeit however briefly! :facepalm:

I did have to crack up when...

Spoiler!

ThatRaceCardGuy 06-25-2013 12:24 PM

Brad Pitt dodging explosion , surviving airline crashes, and miraculously finding a WHO building after hiking for days while impelled with a shiv..oh did I mention he out ran zombies just three days after being impelled? ..movie was okay


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.