Rain Man |
10-15-2015 11:49 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorce
(Post 11804794)
I picked no amount of money would be worth it, I think it would be different if it were for like 10 years. I would trade 10 years of privacy to be financially set for life. I just don't see a point in a lot of money if you can't really be free to go out and spend it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Tattoo
(Post 11804821)
You can fling poo at the gawkers if you want. I'm down for this
No job no worries no bills you get paid & a month out to get your rocks off.
Play endless amount of ps4 games. Order food on line have it delivered.
The more I think about it the better it sounds.
|
That's the weird thing about this scenario for me. I can't decide if it would be a great decision or a terrible decision, because it seems like both arguments are correct.
I went with 'no amount of money' because I figured the tiebreaker would be to stick with what I've got. But then I think about what I'd miss out by being in a zoo, and I don't think it's terribly important. I couldn't go out to restaurants and I couldn't go meet people for dinner or go to the mall. Those things are nice, but they're not necessarily deal killers.
Now that I think about it, not being able to go for a long run would be problematic. I'd be doing a lot of laps in my enclosure.
|