Don't know if true or not.
Steve McEwen ‏<s>@</s>SMcEwen_eh <small class="time"> 4m4 minutes ago </small> In the 2010 WC game, Larry Fitzgerald did the same thing that the LB did to Charles Woodson and no flags.

That creeps me out.

Chris Christie is moist.

Did the ref see it, call it, and then pick up the flag 3 minutes later?

You'd think that group could at least hire 1 or 2 females to hang out with them.

Detroit got screwed, no doubt about it!

The sad thing for me is that I can't tell if that's pass interference or not. I would lean toward no, but that's just because I'm using common sense and not trying to interpret based on the NFL's current pansy rules.

Using common sense, I ask myself, "Did the defender make contact in a way that prevented the receiver from catching the ball?" I mean, that is the original point of the rule, right? The ball hit the defender in the back. The receiver was not going to catch that due to the defender's position, and any contact between the two had nothing to do with the fact that the ball wasn't caught. I view hitting the defender's back as being no different than hitting a lineman's hand when it's thrown. It's a defensed pass, no matter how inadvertent.

But the bottom line is that an official can call it any way he wants and can defend it. That's a major problem and it tells me that the NFL needs to do a global rethinking of its rules. They're too complicated and nuanced these days. In this case, for example, calls aren't being made because contact prevented the receiver from catching the ball. They're being made because contact was made and the ball was not caught, regardless of whether there's any connection between the two events.

No shit it looks like a bath house. LMAO

How many times was that a flag against William Bartee for not turning his head around?

LMAO ^ Governor Christie rocking the same red sweater from three years ago.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Christie was a Giants fan before he became a Cowboys fan (from <a href="https://twitter.com/ripits247">@ripits247</a>) <a href="http://t.co/T1UYJQ6aQB">pic.twitter.com/T1UYJQ6aQB</a></p>&mdash; Busted Coverage (@bustedcoverage) <a href="https://twitter.com/bustedcoverage/status/551911385727508480">January 5, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Christie has also been a Jets fan (from <a href="https://twitter.com/Avalonbryan">@AvalonBryan</a>) <a href="http://t.co/xW1vCk7K5w">pic.twitter.com/xW1vCk7K5w</a></p>&mdash; Busted Coverage (@bustedcoverage) <a href="https://twitter.com/bustedcoverage/status/551915742506287104">January 5, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'm pretty confident in saying that isn't PI, at least in my book. What did the defender interfere with? Nothing. The ball was way underthrown and hit the guy in the back. How could you call that DPI?

I agree with this. It was a poorly thrown ball. It's not like he was draped all over him. A flag would've bailed out Stafford.

What? Not PI in your book? Really? He is not playing the ball nor did he even turn his head while messing with the reciever. It's the very definition of PI.

Messing with the receiver in what way? The receiver is the one initiating the contact. If that's DPI its ticky tacky as hell. Should he be back pedaling the whole way in order to defend against a severely underthrown ball? Literally the only contact he made with the receiver, before getting hit in the back with the ball, was putting his hand on his shoulder pad which in no way impacted the receivers ability to catch an uncatchable ball.

didn't see it, but i'm gathering the refs determined another outcome of a game with a call/noncall?