Quote:
So it comes down to whether it's worth the risk. And I think it is absolutely, positively, 100% worth the risk. (under this scenario - I still want Geno Smith, dammit.) |
Quote:
Will there be better QBs in next year's draft? I don't know. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's when you get into what the Browns GM called the Weeden pick.....a "panicked disaster". |
Quote:
That doesn't mean you don't take a QB, and I think this whole trade scenario works only if you still take a QB at #4. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the Chiefs took Barkley, I would be in no way more disappointed than if they took Wilson. If they aren't taking Geno, then my emotions go way down. Barkley + #34, #36, and two firsts next year Wilson + #34, #36, and two firsts next year. To me, they're the same. |
Hypothetical: Easy answer. You do what the chargers did with Eli and Rivers. You take Geno at number 1. Have the Eagles take Wilson at four and then finalize the trade.
|
It will certainly be interesting leading up to draft day...Reid and the Eagles were booed for drafting McNabb; I wonder what our reaction will be when the pick is announced.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So.....what happens when you trade down to #4 and Wilson goes #2 or #3? What the **** do we do then? Do we reach for Barkley (if they don't have him rated as high) or do you take a player that you now have to find a spot for? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.