Teams rarely use the exclusive franchise tag - it is more common to use the non-exclusive. Non-exclusive grants Sneed the right to seek a better deal with another team. Exclusive does not - Exclusive would mean it would be up to the Chiefs to seek trade compensation.

https://bvmsports.com/2024/02/28/chi...yers-expected/


I suppose there is a scenario where the Chiefs trade Sneed for less than what they would get if they let him walk from signing a deal with another team...but where is the logic in that unless you really don't want him on your team for 1 more year.

If it's exclusive he can't speak with other teams according to the rules the Chiefs would have to seek trade partners.

This is all so confusing...

:shrug:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING: The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> have placed the franchise tag on CB L&#39;Jarius Sneed, sources tell <a href="https://twitter.com/BleacherReport?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BleacherReport</a>. It will cost a little over $19M.<br><br>Kansas City’s priority is to extend Chris Jones for now and they’ll see what happens with Sneed after. <a href="https://t.co/RBfalU55bd">pic.twitter.com/RBfalU55bd</a></p>&mdash; Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) <a href="https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/1762860154272235678?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I can't see that KC will or can afford to let the Jones situation drag on that long.

They will either get something done or give up on it. They can't, in my opinion, compete with teams like the Texans if Jones drags things out and angles for a maximum contract.

If they sign Jones quickly, Sneed is likely gone.

If they give up on Jones...

I see it depending on how much Spags values Sneed versus keeping other players and what Spags thinks of next man up replacing Sneed.

And of course what teams offer for Sneed...

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...5e30e46241.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Bring on Kyle Pitts!!!!








And a 1st rounder

Let’s try to keep this within the realm of realistic LOL….

The thought of getting Jameson back in a trade with Detroit is very intriguing to me…don’t know if they’d deal him but if they were open to it, I def. would be.

I’m down with Jameson. Pitts has been struggling in Atlanta.

Trade compensation is negotiable

If Pitts is struggling what would you call what Jameson has done with the lions?

I wonder if we’d get pick 43 from the Falcons?

I’d probably take that.

Pitts has a body of work comprising 3 full years.

Jameson has a cobbled together 1 full year.

I'd much, much rather have the flyer on the latter.

Trade compensation yes - but if he signs an offer sheet that is too much for the Chiefs to match - the compensation is 2, 1st round picks.

Raheem Morris was the DC in LA when the Rams had to have Jalen Ramsey. Can definitely see them trading pick 43 for Sneed. That sounds very fair

Falcons will more likely send 43 to the Bears for Fields