ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL Rumors: Mahomes, Watson atop KC's QB wish list (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306510)

Mother****erJones 03-10-2017 12:00 PM

They were trying to trade up last year for Lynch. I like these QBs better

Mother****erJones 03-10-2017 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12777471)
Where the **** is Pestilence when you need him? I'm sure he'd give a bj-quality review of Kizer right about now.

Kizer is the best QB in this class. He's going to be good if he goes to the right team

rico 03-10-2017 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 12777799)
The current regime got AS sure, but he wasn't matt asshole. We can't compare them to the whole existence of the franchise though. Ill be real, I haven't been around for the entire existence of the franchise but AS brought stability to the team. Maybe the plan all along is get Alex get stability, get competitive, then wait for the right time and grab your future guy.

Yet another reason to hate Matt Cassel. He has put many of us in a state where we are willing to settle for a guy like Alex Smith. Blech.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-10-2017 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12777664)
In his 2nd full year as starter Cousins showed some inexperience. Heaven have mercy. Meanwhile he's averaged 27 TDs, 68% completions, and 4500 yards on the shithole Redskins.

But that's not good enough at QB for Chiefs fan PGM.

...yet no team seems to want him. **** your stats. That chode couldn't lead the 94 Niners to a title.

raybec 4 03-10-2017 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12777864)
...yet no team seems to want him. **** your stats. That chode couldn't lead the 94 Niners to a title.

How can you say that no team seems to want him? There's a country mile difference between no team wants him and no one wants to give up two firsts for him.

jd1020 03-10-2017 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12777864)
...yet no team seems to want him. **** your stats. That chode couldn't lead the 94 Niners to a title.

Kind of hard to want a guy who has been franchise tagged, no?

Pasta Little Brioni 03-10-2017 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12777867)
How can you say that no team seems to want him? There's a country mile difference between no team wants him and no one wants to give up two firsts for him.

Dude isn't winning anyone a title. Let's find one who can. I'm tired of ither team's castoffs. Isn't this what the board has said for years?

Pasta Little Brioni 03-10-2017 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12777869)
Kind of hard to want a guy who has been franchise tagged, no?

Dude won't win shit in this league and teams know it. Grbac tossed for 500 in a game and he was a loser too.

ptlyon 03-10-2017 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12777881)
Dude won't win shit in this league and teams know it. Grbac tossed for 500 in a game and he was a loser too.

Has to be a Ohio state fan

raybec 4 03-10-2017 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12777873)
Dude isn't winning anyone a title. Let's find one who can. I'm tired of ither team's castoffs. Isn't this what the board has said for years?

I'm not beating the drum for Cousins to come here. But he's a pretty damn good football player. To say no one wants him and he'll never win shit is just talking out your ass.

Dave Lane 03-10-2017 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 12777262)
If the Chiefs think there is a franchise QB in this draft, they must pay the piper and go get them. It makes or breaks you.

Shit I'd trade the entire Chiefs team and ALL my draft picks for 5 years to get a 22 year old Tom Brady. Who wouldn't? Just using free agency and off the street FA you'd still win 5-6 SB's.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-10-2017 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12777892)
I'm not beating the drum for Cousins to come here. But he's a pretty damn good football player. To say no one wants him and he'll never win shit is just talking out your ass.

No it really isn't

BossChief 03-10-2017 12:56 PM

Mahomes is coming on Jim Rome in the next hour.

Hopefully someone can listen and post what was said.

staylor26 03-10-2017 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12777975)
Mahomes is coming on Jim Rome in the next hour.

Hopefully someone can listen and post what was said.

I'm at work listening now. I'll probably catch it.

Rooster 03-10-2017 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12777986)
I'm at work listening now. I'll probably catch it.

:popcorn:

ptlyon 03-10-2017 01:17 PM

Rome: One of the most talked about teams that are rumored to try to draft you is the Kansas city Chiefs. What are your thoughts on going there?

Mahomes: **** them.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 01:19 PM

I turned it on at work. I'll see if I can catch it.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 01:23 PM

He's up now.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-10-2017 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12778017)
Rome: One of the most talked about teams that are rumored to try to draft you is the Kansas city Chiefs. What are your thoughts on going there?

Mahomes: **** them.

:rolleyes:

oldman 03-10-2017 01:24 PM

I think it's much more likely that Peterman or Davis is on Dorsey's radar. Roll with Smith as #1, Bray as #2 and the rookie at #3. Bray and the heir apparent can fight it out for the #1 next year and draft another QB. That is unless Kizer just happens to fall to 27 and then all bets are off.
If Smith goes down this year and Bray and/or the rookie stink, just think how much higher we'll be in the 2018 draft. I'm a glass 1/2 full kind of guy.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 01:24 PM

Wants teams to think about how much he's improved over a short amount of time.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 01:28 PM

He loves having the pressure of having to make the big plays and win games.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 01:32 PM

Learned from the Manning camp to self scout himself and critique himself.

staylor26 03-10-2017 01:33 PM

Pest pretty much summed it all up. Sounds like a great kid.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 01:33 PM

Well that was pretty uneventful. It's over.

RealSNR 03-10-2017 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 12778029)
I think it's much more likely that Peterman or Davis is on Dorsey's radar. Roll with Smith as #1, Bray as #2 and the rookie at #3. Bray and the heir apparent can fight it out for the #1 next year and draft another QB. That is unless Kizer just happens to fall to 27 and then all bets are off.
If Smith goes down this year and Bray and/or the rookie stink, just think how much higher we'll be in the 2018 draft. I'm a glass 1/2 full kind of guy.


I'd rather have Aaron Murray than any of the shit ass pet ****er late rounders this year.

That's what I didn't get. We drafted Murray and Hogan then said, "Not even gonna try developing them." Yet we'll take a jackass with zero potential to be good in Peterman?

RunKC 03-10-2017 02:36 PM

Watson/Mahommes-rd 1
Dobbs/Peterman-later options

I like Kaaya but I think Andy wants a mobile QB

FloridaMan88 03-10-2017 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12778147)
Watson/Mahommes-rd 1
Dobbs/Peterman-later options

I like Kaaya but I think Andy wants a mobile QB

Brad Kaaya is a trainwreck unless he has 100% perfect conditions (great protection, WR's running perfect routes, etc).

He showed zero ability to overcome the slightest hint of in-game adversity in college.

kepp 03-10-2017 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 12777775)
I guess I am just saying that it makes sense from a future standpoint. AS has got two years left contract wise. Trade up and draft a guy now to sit for a year just makes sense with the current roster. The positions you listed are needs but maybe they can fill them in later rounds or FA. Keep the window open and still be competitive after AS is gone. This team is pretty young. We got some aging stars but i think our "window" will be around for some time.

Oh I'm with you...I'd love for it to happen. I probably just jaded.

-King- 03-10-2017 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 12777908)
Shit I'd trade the entire Chiefs team and ALL my draft picks for 5 years to get a 22 year old Tom Brady. Who wouldn't? Just using free agency and off the street FA you'd still win 5-6 SB's.

Yeah... Thats just dumb.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 03-10-2017 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 12777863)
Yet another reason to hate Matt Cassel. He has put many of us in a state where we are willing to settle for a guy like Alex Smith. Blech.

How have we settled and what was your alternative in 2013?
Posted via Mobile Device

RealSNR 03-10-2017 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12778258)
How have we settled and what was your alternative in 2013?
Posted via Mobile Device

Carson Palmer + draft a guy. I wanted Geno, but if they ****ing TRIED, I would have been more than patient.

If that plan blew up, try again in a different year.

The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY.

They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best.

Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?"

Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient.

Nickhead 03-10-2017 04:12 PM

hence why i think the chiefs will draft, if given the chance, a qb this year rather than next year in the first or second. not that they wont draft one again next year, just not as high up. again, im not privy to college games, so i don't know what is the best option realistically. just going off the fact alex will be the starter next year and possibly 18. the problem you run into is he incrementally gets better and they extend alex before 18 is up. :D

New World Order 03-10-2017 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12778258)
How have we settled and what was your alternative in 2013?
Posted via Mobile Device


Someone like Matt Hasselbeck then move on to someone like Derek Carr after a couple of years.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 05:00 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ball velocity numbers (MPH) from the Combine:<br><br>60 - Mahomes<br>59 - Webb<br>56 - Kizer<br>55 - Trubisky, Evans<br>53 - Peterman, Kaaya<br>49 - Watson</p>&mdash; Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/840334987958329346">March 10, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That 60 MPH is impressive for Mahomes. 49 MPH on the other hand for Watson, not good.

Tribal Warfare 03-10-2017 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778380)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ball velocity numbers (MPH) from the Combine:<br><br>60 - Mahomes<br>59 - Webb<br>56 - Kizer<br>55 - Trubisky, Evans<br>53 - Peterman, Kaaya<br>49 - Watson</p>&mdash; Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/840334987958329346">March 10, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That 60 MPH is impressive for Mahomes. 49 MPH on the other hand for Watson, not good.

That's a harder ball than Bray's 59MPH

CrossCheck 03-10-2017 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778380)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ball velocity numbers (MPH) from the Combine:<br><br>60 - Mahomes<br>59 - Webb<br>56 - Kizer<br>55 - Trubisky, Evans<br>53 - Peterman, Kaaya<br>49 - Watson</p>&mdash; Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/840334987958329346">March 10, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That 60 MPH is impressive for Mahomes. 49 MPH on the other hand for Watson, not good.

Stephen Thomas‏ @15Stephen15 · 16m16 minutes ago




@dpbrugler Since 2008, only guy under 55 with any type of success is Tyrod. (Dak threw 54 but had a bum shoulder)

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 05:22 PM

That 49 MPH might kill Watson's stock. Seriously. I always thought his deep ball looked like a floater. Similar to Mariota.

Mahomes or bust IMO.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778405)
That 49 MPH might kill Watson's stock. Seriously. I always thought his deep ball looked like a floater. Similar to Mariota.

Mahomes or bust IMO.

I'd still be ok with Kizer as a consolation prize.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12778406)
I'd still be ok with Kizer as a consolation prize.

I would take one of the other guys, but I wouldn't trade up for anyone but Mahomes at this point.

I'd love to know if Watson was just coasting too much or what, because 49 MPH is awful.

rico 03-10-2017 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778405)
That 49 MPH might kill Watson's stock. Seriously. I always thought his deep ball looked like a floater. Similar to Mariota.

Mahomes or bust IMO.

This... His ball looks ugly and wobbly when he throws it.

SDChiefs 03-10-2017 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 12778432)
This... His ball looks ugly and wobbly when he throws it.

Why you checking out his balls?

rico 03-10-2017 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SDChiefs (Post 12778444)
Why you checking out his balls?

Because our QB is Alex Smith.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 05:57 PM

From Matt Miller with Bleacher Report:

Quote:

Kansas City Chiefs: A developmental quarterback is what the fans want, but a source in the front office told me a defensive-front-seven pick is more likely in Round 1—if the Chiefs don't trade back. "We're in a prime trade-back spot, so I could see that happening too" said the source.
:facepalm:

Prime trade-back spot? We have 10 f**king picks and 70 guys on the roster. Whatever.

rico 03-10-2017 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12778258)
How have we settled and what was your alternative in 2013?
Posted via Mobile Device

Someone who is able to do more than just 1.) Throw check downs, 2.) Complete only one-read passes, 3.) Not throw INT's 4.) Be in possession of hidden gigabytes and 5.) Not put the fans to sleep.

Agree with Hasselbeck/Palmer.

Who knows how some of these other guys (rookies over the past 4 years included) could have done in a different situation...Chiefs have had a nice supporting cast...Smith has benefited from that. Who knows how these guys could have done in Reid's system.

rico 03-10-2017 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778451)
From Matt Miller with Bleacher Report:



:facepalm:

Prime trade-back spot? We have 10 f**king picks and 70 guys on the roster. Whatever.

Ugh, I hope his source is Walter Football.

BossChief 03-10-2017 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778451)
From Matt Miller with Bleacher Report:



:facepalm:

Prime trade-back spot? We have 10 f**king picks and 70 guys on the roster. Whatever.

Don't believe anything that is leaked to the media by anonymous sources around this time of the year.

RunKC 03-10-2017 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778451)
From Matt Miller with Bleacher Report:



:facepalm:

Prime trade-back spot? We have 10 f**king picks and 70 guys on the roster. Whatever.

As mentioned in the draft forum. Believe the first sentence of the article:

"It's lying season in the NFL."

Tribal Warfare 03-10-2017 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778451)
From Matt Miller with Bleacher Report:



:facepalm:

Prime trade-back spot? We have 10 f**king picks and 70 guys on the roster. Whatever.

No joke, I could see KC trading 4 picks to get Mahomes considering the amount they have if they really do think he has the goods

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12778473)
Don't believe anything that is leaked to the media by anonymous sources around this time of the year.

Yeah it's all just rumors at this point....

Personally, if I'm making bets, I think they'd like Reddick or Mahomes in the 1st.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-10-2017 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12777664)
In his 2nd full year as starter Cousins showed some inexperience. Heaven have mercy. Meanwhile he's averaged 27 TDs, 68% completions, and 4500 yards on the shithole Redskins.

But that's not good enough at QB for Chiefs fan PGM.

Do you even watch football? Redskins had a lot of weapons on offense many of them proven vets. Why do you think Washington is being cautious with signing him long term? They know he's got a high chance of regressing to his average play when he loses the luxury of having weapons all over the field

SAUTO 03-10-2017 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12778302)
Carson Palmer + draft a guy. I wanted Geno, but if they ****ing TRIED, I would have been more than patient.

If that plan blew up, try again in a different year.

The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY.

They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best.

Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?"

Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient.

I was, all over palmer that year too .

SAUTO 03-10-2017 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12778486)
Do you even watch football? Redskins had a lot of weapons on offense many of them proven vets. Why do you think Washington is being cautious with signing him long term? They know he's got a high chance of regressing to his average play when he loses the luxury of having weapons all over the field

Can you please post his "average play"?

Facts not Fiction remember? Post the facts of his " average play"

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12778482)
No joke, I could see KC trading 4 picks to get Mahomes considering the amount they have if they really do think he has the goods

And they would be foolish not to give up whatever it takes if the believ he is the man.

No way to know what to believe, but my hopes are up. Not going to reject it, if I end up pissed, I'll end up pissed. I want the gunslinger.

milkman 03-10-2017 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778451)
From Matt Miller with Bleacher Report:



:facepalm:

Prime trade-back spot? We have 10 f**king picks and 70 guys on the roster. Whatever.

Aw....Hell.

Guess I'll hold off on that Mahomes Chiefs jersey I was about to order.

SAUTO 03-10-2017 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12778491)
Can you please post his "average play"?

Facts not Fiction remember? Post the facts of his " average play"

Never mind you're gonna go crickets as usual.

His "average play" since starting is around 4500 yards and 27 tds a year just off the top of my head.

What else you got troll? Hypothetical made up shit? Guesses?


Give me some ****ing facts.

What were you trying to say about cousins?

Red Dawg 03-10-2017 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12778473)
Don't believe anything that is leaked to the media by anonymous sources around this time of the year.

Bullshit. Very big possibility it will happen again and every year we pick this low as long as Doreey is the GM. He should move up for a stud but his history doesn't suggest he would.

O.city 03-10-2017 06:29 PM

Mahomes has a cannon. I like him.

O.city 03-10-2017 06:30 PM

If no one they really have above everyone else is therr at 27 and someone wants to trade up, giving up a 3rd or something, maybe.

SAUTO 03-10-2017 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12778505)
If no one they really have above everyone else is therr at 27 and someone wants to trade up, giving up a 3rd or something, maybe.

So we can cut them?

RunKC 03-10-2017 06:31 PM

Interesting fact about Haason Reddick: Britt Reid coached him 2 years ago at Temple and Reddick said he was the first one who believed in him.

I imagine he's high on our board.

Mr. Laz 03-10-2017 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12778482)
No joke, I could see KC trading 4 picks to get Mahomes considering the amount they have if they really do think he has the goods

Not trying to start shit, but has anyone seen any evidence whatsoever that the Chiefs think they need a new starting QB?

Anything real, not just fan hope.

More specifically, has anyone seen even the slightest indication that Andy Reid isn't satisfied with Alex Smith?

O.city 03-10-2017 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12778510)
Not trying to start shit, but has anyone seen any evidence whatsoever that the Chiefs think they need a new starting QB?

Anything real, not just fan hope.

More specifically, has anyone seen even the slightest indication that Andy Reid isn't satisfied with Alex Smith?

They don't currently have a backuo, unless bray is it. Contractually it's looking like they'll need Smith's space in 2018, but yes the starter in 17.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-10-2017 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12778502)
Never mind you're gonna go crickets as usual.

His "average play" since starting is around 4500 yards and 27 tds a year just off the top of my head.

What else you got troll? Hypothetical made up shit? Guesses?


Give me some ****ing facts.

What were you trying to say about cousins?

There's a reason guys like Russell Wilson get long term contracts and others play on tags. Use your head, genius. Nothing in my previous comment is trolling.

Red Dawg 03-10-2017 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12778510)
Not trying to start shit, but has anyone seen any evidence whatsoever that the Chiefs think they need a new starting QB?

Anything real, not just fan hope.

More specifically, has anyone seen even the slightest indication that Andy Reid isn't satisfied with Alex Smith?

No there isn't. The entire media speculated it because its obvious Smithbwill never get us over the hump even with very good talent around him. He's also on his last year of his contract and is not getting any younger. We need a QB badly to replace him but nobody in the media like any of them as a long term answer including Dorsey.

I would be stunned if he took one early. I would love Macohmes but it's a pipe dream.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-10-2017 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12778491)
Can you please post his "average play"?

Facts not Fiction remember? Post the facts of his " average play"

For comparison: Russell Wilson is in the top tier of QB's for doing this despite playing behind a terrible line and average receivers: http://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats...russell-wilson

Meanwhile Cousins has weapons all over the field yet he's 50% more likely to throw a pick than RW is per throw. THAT is why Washington is hesitant to sign Cousins long term. And this is not even mentioning how he has fumbled the ball 10 times since becoming a full time starter.


Facts, not fiction.

The Franchise 03-10-2017 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12778552)
For comparison: Russell Wilson is in the top tier of QB's for doing this despite playing behind a terrible line and average receivers: http://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats...russell-wilson

Meanwhile Cousins has weapons all over the field yet he's 50% more likely to throw a pick than RW is per throw. THAT is why Washington is hesitant to sign Cousins long term. And this is not even mentioning how he has fumbled the ball 10 times since becoming a full time starter.


Facts, not fiction.

Alex Smith has fumbled the ball 23 times in 4 years.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-10-2017 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12778554)
Alex Smith has fumbled the ball 23 times in 4 years.

He's averaged below 4 fumbles per season in KC and that's considering he's a dual threat QB. And not all of those were lost fumbles. Fact.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-10-2017 07:13 PM

I know it's a q (thanks pugs)

But damn...my top two fav QBs In This draft killing it!

https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/840334987958329346


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2017 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12778572)
I know it's a q (thanks pugs)

But damn...my top two fav QBs In This draft killing it!

https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/840334987958329346


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Webb's velocity was a surprise to me, impressive.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-10-2017 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12778581)
Webb's velocity was a surprise to me, impressive.



The dude is big.

He lost his spot to Mahomes after dropping 20lbs from an illness that sidelined him.

He is my darkhorse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rico 03-10-2017 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12778597)
The dude is big.

He lost his spot to Mahomes after dropping 20lbs from an illness that sidelined him.

He is my darkhorse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just remember....I was on the bandwebbon first, biotch!!! ;)

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2017 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 12777285)
I wouldn't get too worked up for a QB in the 1st people
I think it's next year.
You are just gonna piss yourselves off and we will have another Geno Smith situation.
It's not fun.

No one in their right mind is getting "worked up" over KC drafting a QB. We have all come to expect sub-par reerunery when it comes to the Chiefs and QB's.

-King- 03-10-2017 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12778302)
Carson Palmer + draft a guy. I wanted Geno, but if they ****ing TRIED, I would have been more than patient.

If that plan blew up, try again in a different year.

The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY.

They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best.

Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?"

Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient.

Why would the Raiders trade Palmer to a division rival?
Posted via Mobile Device

CoMoChief 03-10-2017 08:24 PM

If they were serious about drafting a QBOTF, they'd trade up for Watson.

Red Dawg 03-10-2017 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 12778652)
If they were serious about drafting a QBOTF, they'd trade up for Watson.

Only if they like him a ton and it would take more picks than we have to get far enough up. In 4 drafts he has not once traded up in the first two rounds for anyone that I recall. Even if we move back it feels like 2 defensive players will be the first two picks. When you are in cap hell and can't sign any vets to fill needs all you can do is draft or trade. He never trades so we will pick.

Tribal Warfare 03-10-2017 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 12778652)
If they were serious about drafting a QBOTF, they'd trade up for Watson.

Photo ops with Clark dictate otherwise

Mr. Laz 03-10-2017 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12778513)
They don't currently have a backuo, unless bray is it. Contractually it's looking like they'll need Smith's space in 2018, but yes the starter in 17.

Fair enough, but we've always brought in a veteran QB to fill the backup spot instead of training a rookie.

Daniel and Foles

Have we ever even had a young QB on the active roster during the regular season?

Mr. Laz 03-10-2017 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12778302)
Carson Palmer + draft a guy. I wanted Geno, but if they ****ing TRIED, I would have been more than patient.

If that plan blew up, try again in a different year.

The problem with Chiefs fans is that whenever a QB crisis occurs when they can absolutely no longer roll with the current veteran because he's washed up/suck too much, they act like they have to solve the problem NOW. INSTANTLY.

They don't think about QB development as a multi-year process. It's like Carl stepped down from GMing, but instead went into the business of mind control lasers, and he's got everybody thinking his way is the best.

Thus, you get all the, "Gee, I'd love to draft a QB, but there's no Andrew Luck available at 27th overall! Next year is a better class, maybe we'll get one then!" And it's also how you get, "I don't like what Alex Smith is doing, but what should the Chiefs have done, exactly?"

Uhh... how about plan ahead? But since they didn't do that, they should just be ****ing patient.

Which is why I was pretty surprised when I got beaten down around here for suggesting that the Chiefs should trade Foles during Preseason when teams lost their starters and where desperate to trade.

"we can't trade Foles, we might need him"
"we can't trade Foles, it might hurt his feelings after wanting to play for Reid"
"we can't trade foles .............

Vikings gave a 1st and 4th(conditional 3rd) for Bradford when he was considered a total mess and injury disaster.

How much would an extra 1st rounder be worth to use right now? Hell, even an extra 2nd would be trade-up gold.

Chiefs could have 'planned ahead' be in great shape to trade anywhere they wanted in this draft.

-King- 03-10-2017 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12778757)
Fair enough, but we've always brought in a veteran QB to fill the backup spot instead of training a rookie.

Daniel and Foles

Have we ever even had a young QB on the active roster during the regular season?

"Always" it's been 4 years.

And Murray was on the active roster for most of his years here.
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.