ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV DeNiro, Pacino, Pesci, Scorsese.....The Irishman trailer (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=324222)

BucEyedPea 11-30-2019 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 14623433)
Watched it last night on Netflix. Watching Pacino and Deniro act together was great to see. Scorsese and mob movies are always entertaining. But 3.5+ hours? Netflix should have made this a limited series.

You coulda' divided it up. That's what we did. The so wanted to see it. I'm not a big mob movie fan. So I didn't care for it at first, but as it proceeded I did like it. It's based on a true story and this Irishman claims he knocked off Hoffa on his deathbed. However, there are others that say his claim is not true.

I couldn't understand how they could take two old men, DeNiro and Pacino making a movie in old age, being able to do flashbacks where they look much younger. So I looked it up and found out their faces were all digitally altered to look younger. Amazing!

scho63 12-01-2019 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mennonite (Post 14624086)
It's the first truly interactive movie. It's so long the audience ages and dies along with the characters.

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

scho63 12-01-2019 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14624649)
How do you make a movie around Jimmy Hoffa's disappearance based on facts when no one knows the facts?

The movie is based on a book told by Sheeran.

Because Sheeran's stories are being debunked. :harumph:

RINGLEADER 12-01-2019 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 14625132)
It's slow. If it had been a theatrical release, there would be an hour of cellulose acetate lying on the floor. It had some good moments. Will watch again to stitch together details.

I saw it in a theater. It was boring/disappointing.

jd1020 12-01-2019 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14625283)
Because Sheeran's stories are being debunked. :harumph:

Being debunked by people who have 20 different theories about how he died themselves. He was chopped up and put in sausage. No wait he was buried alive under a horse barn. No wait he was dumped in a landfill owned by the mob... etc, etc.

Scorsese himself said it wasnt important to have a historically accurate account of what happened because we'll never know for sure. It's just a compelling story told by an insider and ya it's probably fabricated by someone trying to sell a book but thats the same story as the rest of the guys who probably have some knowledge of what happened. It's the Black Dahlia, Zodiac, Jack the Ripper.

Tribal Warfare 12-01-2019 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14623601)
Seeing 70 year old guys trying to play and sing their greatest hits isn't always so great

Bruce Springsteen did a show last week at the Stone Pony and one of buddys who was there commented on how we are all old and can't outrun Father Time no matter how hard we try.

BTW, Eddie Van Zandt has a cameo in this movie too

BucEyedPea 12-01-2019 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14625304)
Being debunked by people who have 20 different theories about how he died themselves. He was chopped up and put in sausage. No wait he was buried alive under a horse barn. No wait he was dumped in a landfill owned by the mob... etc, etc.

Possibly, due to what DeNiro's character claimed in the movie, that only parts of a hit are revealed to each player involved so no one knows the whole truth about it.

Baby Lee 12-01-2019 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14625306)
BTW, Eddie Van Zandt has a cameo in this movie too

Stevie?

scho63 12-01-2019 12:57 PM

I just finished watching this and I was impressed. I like the way the story came together.

It was much more about the whole interaction between the mob and the teamsters than a movie of violence.

Al Pacino was probably my least favorite as he has become a caricature of himself as he is over the top and the last 10 roles all seem like he is doing the same thing. He didn't come across as Hoffa in anyway to me. Bad casting on that one role.

I thought Pesci was great and played his part very subdued.

Also a lot of this action took place a lot further in the past than it came across in the movie. It was the early to mid 50's into the late 70s. It felt like mid to late 60's to early 80s.

Overall I give it an 8.5-9 out of 10

jd1020 12-01-2019 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea (Post 14625582)
Possibly, due to what DeNiro's character claimed in the movie, that only parts of a hit are revealed to each player involved so no one knows the whole truth about it.

Obviously someone knows the whole truth about it. Just one problem, that person probably ate a couple bullets to the head a few years later.

Deberg_1990 12-01-2019 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14625809)
I just finished watching this and I was impressed. I like the way the story came together.

It was much more about the whole interaction between the mob and the teamsters than a movie of violence.

Al Pacino was probably my least favorite as he has become a caricature of himself as he is over the top and the last 10 roles all seem like he is doing the same thing. He didn't come across as Hoffa in anyway to me. Bad casting on that one role.

I thought Pesci was great and played his part very subdued.

Also a lot of this action took place a lot further in the past than it came across in the movie. It was the early to mid 50's into the late 70s. It felt like mid to late 60's to early 80s.

Overall I give it an 8.5-9 out of 10

Yea Pacino was definitely in “because she’s got a great ass!!” Mode.

He did have the one classic scene I mentioned earlier about being late to the Miami meeting.

Mama Hip Rockets 12-01-2019 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mennonite (Post 14624086)
It's the first truly interactive movie. It's so long the audience ages and dies along with the characters.

ROFL

banecat 12-01-2019 05:38 PM

The end of an era ended very well

BigRedChief 12-02-2019 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 14626056)
Yea Pacino was definitely in “because she’s got a great ass!!” Mode.

He did have the one classic scene I mentioned earlier about being late to the Miami meeting.

yeah, Pacino ranting about wearing clothes to a meeting scene was fantastic.:thumb:

Great Expectations 12-02-2019 03:37 PM

Pacino hasn’t been good for a very long time. Scent of a Woman was probably his last really good acting performance.

Frazod 12-02-2019 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 14630551)
Pacino hasn’t been good for a very long time. Scent of a Woman was probably his last really good acting performance.

He had a few good ones after that (Heat, Donnie Brasco, Insomnia), but the last good movie he's been in that I've seen was Insomnia, and that was made 17 years ago.

He's like a caricature of himself now.

Halfcan 12-02-2019 04:42 PM

I watched it over the weekend and was impressed.

Pesci was the best and Harvey Keitel was pretty badass as well.

A couple of Big mob hits were accounted for in this one. It makes you wonder if this guy really hit them or not- seems pretty plausible, especially with Crazy Joe Gallo.

Deberg_1990 12-02-2019 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14630642)
He had a few good ones after that (Heat, Donnie Brasco, Insomnia), but the last good movie he's been in that I've seen was Insomnia, and that was made 17 years ago.

He's like a caricature of himself now.

I would agree with this. He was still good in the 90s.

And his last great movie was Insomnia before this one.

Alot of his movies over the past 17-18 years have been made with inferior talent and direct to home video stuff.

Clyde Frog 12-03-2019 12:11 PM

The pacing dragged. I had to break it into parts to finish it. It was a good watch but, unlike Marty's other films, I wouldn't watch it again. The Action Bronson Cameo (even though I'm a fan of his music and TV show) was...interesting, to say the least.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-03-2019 12:18 PM

I watched it in 2 parts and it was fine. No time for movies that long or I'd have no trouble finishing.

Cheater5 12-03-2019 04:25 PM

While I watched it I felt at the end that is was three actors who should have just faded away playing the same style of role they have always played in a story that nobody cares about.


So I made it through 30 minutes and got done with it post haste...

DJ's left nut 12-03-2019 04:31 PM

I watched about 40 minutes over lunch.

Are we sure this movie is good? I mean, watching a computer generated DeNiro 'savagely pummel' the shop owner with a series of old man kicks and foot stomps that couldn't put out a lit cigarette made me long for the days of Sonny Corleone's phantom punch on Carlo.

I'm kinda concerned at this point that this movie might suck. We shall see...

Dayze 12-04-2019 08:17 AM

I liked it. But, DeNiro was paid to basically just stare into a camera for a crazy mount of time.

Pacino was....Pacino of late. Cartoonish. Didn’t believe him as Hoffa at all. Pesci was really good. Subdued , but powerful.

DJ's left nut 12-04-2019 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 14633197)
I liked it. But, DeNiro was paid to basically just stare into a camera for a crazy mount of time.

Pacino was....Pacino of late. Cartoonish. Didn’t believe him as Hoffa at all. Pesci was really good. Subdued , but powerful.

Go back 20 years and tell me that ANYONE would've thought Joe Pesci would've 'won' a movie w/ DeNiro and Pacino.

Even in Goodfellas he seemed overmatched by DeNiro (who was in the midst of his prime, IMO) and Liota.

I think they may have overplayed the 'understated quasi Mafia-Don' persona, but I don't know Buffalino's history all that well.

The 50's and 60's were such a fascinating time for NY Organized crime. All the post-war jockeying of the families to establish territory in the wake of Luciano's deportation makes for some good reading. Luciano himself is a really interesting character as well with Lansky and Siegel. Luciano essentially created the 'NY Mafia' as we know it.

Frazod 12-04-2019 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14632468)
I watched about 40 minutes over lunch.

Are we sure this movie is good? I mean, watching a computer generated DeNiro 'savagely pummel' the shop owner with a series of old man kicks and foot stomps that couldn't put out a lit cigarette made me long for the days of Sonny Corleone's phantom punch on Carlo.

I'm kinda concerned at this point that this movie might suck. We shall see...

I got an hour and a half in and never went back. It's just an old, tired, copy of a copy of a copy. Vastly overrated.

scho63 12-04-2019 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14633225)
Go back 20 years and tell me that ANYONE would've thought Joe Pesci would've 'won' a movie w/ DeNiro and Pacino.

Even in Goodfellas he seemed overmatched by DeNiro (who was in the midst of his prime, IMO) and Liota.

I think they may have overplayed the 'understated quasi Mafia-Don' persona, but I don't know Buffalino's history all that well.

The 50's and 60's were such a fascinating time for NY Organized crime. All the post-war jockeying of the families to establish territory in the wake of Luciano's deportation makes for some good reading. Luciano himself is a really interesting character as well with Lansky and Siegel. Luciano essentially created the 'NY Mafia' as we know it
.

The Mafia in the 60's and 70's went underground and the bosses were quiet as hell as well as out of the spotlight. You would NEVER see a mafia boss and say "OH, that guy's a gangster." They didn't dress like hoods, they didn't drive flashy cars or big houses and kept real low profiles.

The big turning point of the mob coming above ground and the dumb street rats taking over and destroying the mob was Nicky Scarfo first in Philly killing Angelo Bruno and setting off a violent mob war and then flashy John Gotti killed Paul Castellano. Once those two goons took over the mob went from quiet ruthless businessmen to loud obnoxious serial killers and psychopaths.

Those two guys decimated the mob in about 10-15 years.

Some of the new old time leaders from Italy are trying to bring it back underground.

DJ's left nut 12-04-2019 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14633942)
The Mafia in the 60's and 70's went underground and the bosses were quiet as hell as well as out of the spotlight. You would NEVER see a mafia boss and say "OH, that guy's a gangster." They didn't dress like hoods, they didn't drive flashy cars or big houses and kept real low profiles.

Coincides with the Apalachin Meeting.

"Coincides" is probably not the right way to put it. "Was a direct result of" is probably more accurate.

What a hilarious shitshow that whole thing was. Vito Genovese may have been the biggest idiot in the annals of organized crime, including the mouth-breathing triggermen (which was essentially all Genovese was to begin with).

I'm not criticizing the way Pesci played the understated way that Pesci played the role, I'm more curious with how much control they have vested in Bufalino. It just seems that they had a few too many roads leading back to him.

Maybe I'm wrong; it's possible that the universe being portrayed in this move is a little more narrowly focused than I am understanding and in fact he WAS the big dick in charge. It just seems odd to me that they are suggesting that Bufalino was possibly directly responsible for the Anastasia assassination or at least had to sign off on it.

I mean c'mon - Anastasia ran the what would be come the Gambino outfit at the time, no? Am I really to believe that this guy had the power to sanction a hit on the leader of arguably the most powerful family in NY? My recollection is that the entire NY Commission pretty much had enough of Anastasia's shit and had him killed. That's not something that Bufalino would've been directly responsible for.

Deberg_1990 12-04-2019 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 14633197)
I. Pesci was really good. Subdued , but powerful.

Pesci was probably the best thing about the movie. He was so good.

And it was a completely different role than Goodfellas and Casino. He wasnt an enforcer.

It was a quiet understated role. I liked him alot in this.

ShiftyEyedWaterboy 12-04-2019 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 14634536)
Pesci was probably the best thing about the movie. He was so good.

And it was a completely different role than Goodfellas and Casino. He wasnt an enforcer.

It was a quiet understated role. I liked him alot in this.

Agreed. He nailed it.

scho63 12-05-2019 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14633979)
Coincides with the Apalachin Meeting.

"Coincides" is probably not the right way to put it. "Was a direct result of" is probably more accurate.

What a hilarious shitshow that whole thing was. Vito Genovese may have been the biggest idiot in the annals of organized crime, including the mouth-breathing triggermen (which was essentially all Genovese was to begin with).

I'm not criticizing the way Pesci played the understated way that Pesci played the role, I'm more curious with how much control they have vested in Bufalino. It just seems that they had a few too many roads leading back to him.

Maybe I'm wrong; it's possible that the universe being portrayed in this move is a little more narrowly focused than I am understanding and in fact he WAS the big dick in charge. It just seems odd to me that they are suggesting that Bufalino was possibly directly responsible for the Anastasia assassination or at least had to sign off on it.

I mean c'mon - Anastasia ran the what would be come the Gambino outfit at the time, no? Am I really to believe that this guy had the power to sanction a hit on the leader of arguably the most powerful family in NY? My recollection is that the entire NY Commission pretty much had enough of Anastasia's shit and had him killed. That's not something that Bufalino would've been directly responsible for.

The Mob is like Linkedin for criminals. It's just a giant network of who knows who knows who knows knows who. It's how a person can get favors from anyone anywhere.

Buffalino was an incredible networker and guy who quietly built an immense network of contacts all over the region he was in control of. It was outside most of the big regions like NYC, Chicago, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.

You look at the Patricia family of New England, Santo Trafficante of Florida, Carlos Marcello of New Orleans, Buffalino of New York State and rural Pennsylvania and other midest areas. They guys had a lot of power because they were the only one family and had huge regions.

Angelo Bruno was another old school, quiet businessman that kept a very low profile. He had tons of politicians and contacts everywhere and was very respected from both sides.

Vito Genovese was definitely more thuggish than a businessman.

Albert Anastasia was one of many who died during the 50's when the mob families were fighting for control and dominance.

They got real quiet in the 60s and 70s and made billions once the violence slowed down

Simply Red 12-05-2019 07:59 AM

It was great, until
Spoiler!

alanm 12-05-2019 10:15 AM

Started watching it this movie this morning. Love it so far. I dunno I guess you gotta be Italian. Brings back memories of old KC, South Omaha. Mom's family ect. My Grandpa who's nickname was the "Pope". I grew up with this shit. Then I went into Law Enforcement. ;)

Mennonite 12-05-2019 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14634906)
It was great, until
Spoiler!





<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4MYjUp75LzI" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

alanm 12-05-2019 12:57 PM

And always ALWAYS show up early. It's disrespect if you don't. :shake: At least a hr. I can't tell you how much " Face" means. Especially with the Mex cartels now. 15 yrs. working with them after 911.

DJ's left nut 12-05-2019 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14634906)
It was great, until
Spoiler!

So I'm about halfway; Hoffa's clearly on the scene now.

I'm not actually opposed to how Pacino's portraying him. Hoffa was, by most accounts, a fiery dude who had a hell of a temper. Going over the top to play him isn't exactly unreasonable.

I think the problem isn't Pacino in this movie, it's Pacino in every other movie he's made in the last 20 years and the audience reaction to him. We're just kinda worn thin on his particular form of scenery chewing. This is pretty much just what Pacino does now so all we see is Pacino. We don't see Pacino playing Hoffa.

Should Scorsese have seen that coming and cast someone else in the role? Possibly. I think you can criticize Scorsese for the casting choice because it is a little difficult to stay in the movie when he's on the screen. All you see is Pacino in much the same way that Tom Cruise is always Tom Cruise.

But in a vacuum, had we not been 'treated' to 2 decades of Pacino shouting, I don't think we'd have a problem with how he handles the role in this movie. It's not like it's as bizarre as him playing King Richard or anything...

alanm 12-05-2019 01:39 PM

As a teamster membster o f @459 at the moment. And as a former fed, IM Torn. Everything is so ripped up,

alanm 12-05-2019 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14635557)
So I'm about halfway; Hoffa's clearly on the scene now.

I'm not actually opposed to how Pacino's portraying him. Hoffa was, by most accounts, a fiery dude who had a hell of a temper. Going over the top to play him isn't exactly unreasonable.

I think the problem isn't Pacino in this movie, it's Pacino in every other movie he's made in the last 20 years and the audience reaction to him. We're just kinda worn thin on his particular form of scenery chewing. This is pretty much just what Pacino does now so all we see is Pacino. We don't see Pacino playing Hoffa.

Should Scorsese have seen that coming and cast someone else in the role? Possibly. I think you can criticize Scorsese for the casting choice because it is a little difficult to stay in the movie when he's on the screen. All you see is Pacino in much the same way that Tom Cruise is always Tom Cruise.

But in a vacuum, had we not been 'treated' to 2 decades of Pacino shouting, I don't think we'd have a problem with how he handles the role in this movie. It's not like it's as bizarre as him playing King Richard or anything...

Pacino was good in this movie. Hoffa was a idiot. My best guess he was retired in the Greart lakes. Just my take. WTF do I know know I'm just a retired @@@ Agent.

alanm 12-05-2019 01:59 PM

I was assigned s a young field officer. Got nowhere. Still a open case for the most part..

MahiMike 12-05-2019 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graystoke (Post 14623598)
Wasn’t impressed

This. 3 1/2 hours of meh. I fast forwarded the last 50 mins.

Simply Red 12-05-2019 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14635557)
So I'm about halfway; Hoffa's clearly on the scene now.

I'm not actually opposed to how Pacino's portraying him. Hoffa was, by most accounts, a fiery dude who had a hell of a temper. Going over the top to play him isn't exactly unreasonable.

I think the problem isn't Pacino in this movie, it's Pacino in every other movie he's made in the last 20 years and the audience reaction to him. We're just kinda worn thin on his particular form of scenery chewing. This is pretty much just what Pacino does now so all we see is Pacino. We don't see Pacino playing Hoffa.

Should Scorsese have seen that coming and cast someone else in the role? Possibly. I think you can criticize Scorsese for the casting choice because it is a little difficult to stay in the movie when he's on the screen. All you see is Pacino in much the same way that Tom Cruise is always Tom Cruise.

But in a vacuum, had we not been 'treated' to 2 decades of Pacino shouting, I don't think we'd have a problem with how he handles the role in this movie. It's not like it's as bizarre as him playing King Richard or anything...

After say - 1980 - the only thing I recall liking him in was The Devil's Advocate. He single handedly ruined this film. DeNiro was the star and JP was a close second.

Mennonite 12-06-2019 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14636475)
After say - 1980 - the only thing I recall liking him in was The Devil's Advocate. He single handedly ruined this film. DeNiro was the star and JP was a close second.


Scarface? Sea of Love? Carlito's Way?

DJ's left nut 12-06-2019 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14636475)
After say - 1980 - the only thing I recall liking him in was The Devil's Advocate. He single handedly ruined this film. DeNiro was the star and JP was a close second.

He's pretty good in Donnie Brasco and Carlito's Way (though that movie doesn't work without Sean Penn). But he really does play the same damn guy almost every time.

Baby Lee 12-06-2019 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mennonite (Post 14637093)
Scarface? Sea of Love? Carlito's Way?

Since this is the subject, this clip might be fun

<iframe width="949" height="534" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bVjm6hbSJQI" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Otter 12-09-2019 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14634865)
The Mob is like Linkedin for criminals. It's just a giant network of who knows who knows who knows knows who. It's how a person can get favors from anyone anywhere.

Buffalino was an incredible networker and guy who quietly built an immense network of contacts all over the region he was in control of. It was outside most of the big regions like NYC, Chicago, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.

You look at the Patricia family of New England, Santo Trafficante of Florida, Carlos Marcello of New Orleans, Buffalino of New York State and rural Pennsylvania and other midest areas. They guys had a lot of power because they were the only one family and had huge regions.

Angelo Bruno was another old school, quiet businessman that kept a very low profile. He had tons of politicians and contacts everywhere and was very respected from both sides.

Vito Genovese was definitely more thuggish than a businessman.

Albert Anastasia was one of many who died during the 50's when the mob families were fighting for control and dominance.

They got real quiet in the 60s and 70s and made billions once the violence slowed down

You sound like a man that if you haven't discovered this podcast yet you'll be glad you just did:

https://audioboom.com/channel/mafia

scho63 12-09-2019 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 14645176)
You sound like a man that if you haven't discovered this podcast yet you'll be glad you just did:

https://audioboom.com/channel/mafia

Well aware ;)

Thanks for the suggestion

I love listening to the Hollywood Godfather podcasts with Gianni Russo, aka Carlo Rizzi from Godfather I

Nzoner 12-10-2019 07:39 AM

Props to those of you who made it through this in one or two tries,I think I hit pause 5 or 6 times and eventually made it with absolutely no desire to ever watch it again.

Simply Red 12-10-2019 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mennonite (Post 14637093)
Scarface? Sea of Love? Carlito's Way?

Fine - 2000

He did a bang up job in The Devil's Advocate.

DJ's left nut 12-13-2019 02:21 PM

So I'm through it.

Meh.

It's not a bad movie, but I don't understand the hype.

Dayze 12-13-2019 02:29 PM

I enjoyed it; but not really enough to watch it again.
certain movies I can watch over and over no matter where I catch them on TV; Shawshank, Goodfellas, The God Father, Casino etc.....this movie isn't like that for me.

burt 12-13-2019 02:50 PM

Yeah, I am halfway through, but haven't had the desire to fire it up because I sure don't want to be depressed.... Dying alone and all that!

Great Expectations 12-13-2019 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14647873)
Fine - 2000

He did a bang up job in The Devil's Advocate.

I thought he over acted his way through the Devil’s Advocate, or at least the entire second half. He could be subtle early, but not post 1980 or so.

Deberg_1990 12-13-2019 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 14653944)
I thought he over acted his way through the Devil’s Advocate, or at least the entire second half. He could be subtle early, but not post 1980 or so.

Carlitos Way, Donnie Brasco, Insomnia

Three really great, low key performances

And even though he goes over the top in Heat a few times, he also has some really great low key scenes as well.

Baby Lee 12-13-2019 07:39 PM

Glengarry Glen Ross gets you a lot of leeway.

You fairies, . . . you . . . company men. . .

Easy 6 12-14-2019 06:24 PM

The more I read about it here and elsewhere, the more meh it gets... I’m definitely in no rush to see it

alpha_omega 12-16-2019 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 14655176)
The more I read about it here and elsewhere, the more meh it gets... I’m definitely in no rush to see it

Finally finished it. Here's some more....

Meh.

Wish i could have my 3.5 hours back.

scho63 12-16-2019 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alpha_omega (Post 14659479)
Finally finished it. Here's some more....

Meh.

Wish i could have my 3.5 hours back.

You didn't like ANYTHING about it? :hmmm:

BucEyedPea 12-16-2019 12:34 PM

I thought Pacino was great in it. I don't know what Hoffa's personality was like enough to say Pacino was over-the-top but actors usually research their characters and perhaps that's how Hoffa behaved.

alpha_omega 12-16-2019 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14659561)
You didn't like ANYTHING about it? :hmmm:

Not really. I had high hopes, but was really disappointed.

It almost seemed like they were trying too hard.

Baby Lee 12-18-2019 12:18 AM

<iframe width="949" height="534" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VPoOiEOLpZg" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ancenpaype 12-23-2019 08:02 PM

DeNiro Pacino Pesci Scorsese The Irishman trailer
 
the budget on this has ballooned from 100 million at Paramount to 125 million at Netflix and now up to 140 million, which Ill just imagine is Martin Scorsese doing his part to put Netflix further into impossible-to-recoup debt

Dallas Chief 12-24-2019 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 14635593)
I was assigned s a young field officer. Got nowhere. Still a open case for the most part..

Something you want to share with the rest of us?

Deberg_1990 12-24-2019 11:23 AM

What the hell? How is it that this deep fake looks better than the millions they spent on the process in the movie????



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dyRvbFhknRc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

banecat 12-24-2019 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea (Post 14659575)
I thought Pacino was great in it. I don't know what Hoffa's personality was like enough to say Pacino was over-the-top but actors usually research their characters and perhaps that's how Hoffa behaved.

Jack Nicholson portrayed Hoffa in a movie of the same name in the early nineties. I recall it being similar, but not quite as manic as often

vailpass 12-24-2019 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 14663186)
<iframe width="949" height="534" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VPoOiEOLpZg" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.