ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   This strategy seems to fit Brett Veach’s aggression (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314794)

Tribal Warfare 04-09-2018 04:52 PM

No joke, I wouldn't be surprised if Justin Houston(age, and from reports he had a problem with how Peters was handled) isn't traded for a late 1st round pick which would make sense why KC has interviewed Dorance Armstrong multiple times for a target #54 pick selection.

Chief Roundup 04-09-2018 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13509882)
No joke, I wouldn't be surprised if Justin Houston(age, and from reports he had a problem with how Peters was handled) isn't traded for a late 1st round pick which would make sense why KC has interviewed Dorance Armstrong multiple times for a target #54 pick selection.

Link?

Chief Northman 04-09-2018 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13509882)
No joke, I wouldn't be surprised if Justin Houston(age, and from reports he had a problem with how Peters was handled) isn't traded for a late 1st round pick which would make sense why KC has interviewed Dorance Armstrong multiple times for a target #54 pick selection.

Nick Athan is that you? :rolleyes:

Get outta here with this shit. No way the Chiefs accrue $12.7 million in dead money just to get a late first round pick. And if Dorance Armstrong is drafted at #54, Veach needs to be shown the door.

Tribal Warfare 04-09-2018 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 13510071)
Nick Athan is that you? :rolleyes:

Get outta here with this shit. No way the Chiefs accrue $12.7 million in dead money just to get a late first round pick. And if Dorance Armstrong is drafted at #54, Veach needs to be shown the door.

They've been scouting the shit out of Armstrong, and if Houston isn't cool with the Peters trade which I thought we would've gained a 1st round pick out Marcus. With going with that below market deal, anything is possible if Justin doesn't have the desired "attitude" because of said transaction.

If Houston doesn't have quarrels with it, though by all reports he did like Peters then it's a non-issue.

Chief Roundup 04-09-2018 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 13510386)
They've been scouting the shit out of Armstrong, and if Houston isn't cool with the Peters trade which I thought we would've gained a 1st round pick out Marcus. With going with that below market deal, anything is possible if Justin doesn't have the desired "attitude" because of said transaction.

If Houston doesn't have quarrels with it, though by all reports he did like Peters then it's a non-issue.

Where are you getting this idea that Houston had a problem with us trading Peters?

Tribal Warfare 04-09-2018 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 13510412)
Where are you getting this idea that Houston had a problem with us trading Peters?

Terez, was talking about it in one of his podcasts

Chargem 04-10-2018 01:34 AM

Dorance isn't a second round talent in my opinion, would be a reach

RunKC 04-15-2018 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13509644)
I'm just not sure about trading up. They need a lot of depth on D and I hate giving up picks, especially premium picks.

The Browns have picks 33 and 35. The Colts have picks 36 and 37.
A 2nd rd pick is worth 270 points at the very least, which easily equals enough to trade for 35 or 37.

Dorsey and Ballard would absolutely trade down 20 spots for a 2nd rd pick next year, especially already having made an early 2nd rd pick.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-16-2018 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 13508360)
I'm not so sure its necessary, its a deep draft at almost all of our defensive positions of need

The earlier you pick a player out of a larger position group should give you a BETTER player.

In other words:

The best rated player out of a pool of 30 should be better than the best rated player out of a pool of 10

Titty Meat 04-16-2018 11:28 AM

Moving up makes no sense

Chief Roundup 04-16-2018 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13518197)
The Browns have picks 33 and 35. The Colts have picks 36 and 37.
A 2nd rd pick is worth 270 points at the very least, which easily equals enough to trade for 35 or 37.

Dorsey and Ballard would absolutely trade down 20 spots for a 2nd rd pick next year, especially already having made an early 2nd rd pick.

It would be just as easy to see where either or both would trade those picks to move up and get a player that they covet and get the 5th year option.

BossChief 04-17-2018 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13519017)
Moving up makes no sense

Completely depends on how the draft unfolds.

Mother****erJones 04-18-2018 08:35 PM

Moving up makes a ton of sense. It just depends on the compensation

EricBerryBoom 04-20-2018 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13522504)
Moving up makes a ton of sense. It just depends on the compensation

Especially if the person you're moving up for is at a position where you can really make good use of the 5th year option. It's an underrated benefit for 1st round players.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.