ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs **** you, Dee Ford

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

**** you, Dee Ford (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=320656)

I really thought at one time that he would be a killer compliment to justin houston. ha.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 15186674)

Another broken down jalopy

More like a Jaguar XJ220.

It really only does one thing well (though it does do that thing quite well) but only when the sun is shining, the ground is dry and the wind is calm. Oh, and if it hasn't already broken down, but since it's a Jaguar it's pretty much always broken down.

It costs more than it should for a one-trick pony, it looks REALLY good on the showroom but never quite lives up to its billing. And ultimately years of attempts to baby the engineering yielded a product that just isn't what it was capable of being.

Dee Ford is just a super finicky, really unreliable, ultimately mediocre supercar.

And for some strange reason the 49ers kept kinda treating him like a work truck. Dude's just not that guy. I mean you damn near can't even have him out there practicing.

You just accept him for what he is (and is not), use him on 3rd downs and hope you have him when you need him at the end of the season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 15186688)

I really thought at one time that he would be a killer compliment to justin houston. ha.

Honestly, he kinda was when he was healthy. IIRC, we led the league in sacks in 2018 with Houston, Jones and Ford.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 15186671)

Guessing one of his back muscles is lined up across the neutral zone of a nerve

ROFL

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15186690)

The reason they treat him that way is because of this little tidbit that came out before the Super Bowl:

Quote:

With Ford-13 games / Without Ford-6 games (playing four or zero snaps).

Points Per Game Allowed: 16.6 (with) / 25.8 (without)
Differential: 9.2 less points given up with Ford

Passing Yards Allowed Per Game: 162.7 (with) / 213.6 (without)
50.9 less passing yards allowed per game with Ford

Sacks Per Game: 4 (with) / 1.5 (without)
2.5 more sacks a game with Ford.

Nick Bosa: 11 Sacks (with Ford) / 2 sacks (without Ford)
9 more sacks in total with Ford in uniform.

The simple fact is that without Dee Ford, their entire game plan isn't the same.

He sure is out of service a lot for being a Ford. Maybe he should change his name to Dee Dodge or something.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 15186655)

sack of ****ing shit

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">After further evaluation, <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/49ers?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#49ers</a> DE Dee Ford is expected to miss this week’s game against the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Giants?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Giants</a> and there’s no clear timetable for his return, sources tell me and <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MikeGarafolo</a>. The hope is Ford’s back injury settles down, but it may take some time.</p>— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1308485568750391296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Thankful everyday we didn’t pay this brokedick

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15186699)

The reason they treat him that way is because of this little tidbit that came out before the Super Bowl:

The simple fact is that without Dee Ford, their entire game plan isn't the same.

Yeah I remember that.

Frankly, I'm not sure it works without Buckner either. He was a far bigger part of that pass-rush than he gets credit for.

They needed that full package to simply be overwhelming and without Ford AND Buckner, they were good but didn't reach that pivot point of being dominant.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15186726)

It’s crazy that they’ll be down to just Armstead this week from that front 4.

Yet another example of a great defense not becoming a perennial Super Bowl contender. It’s just too difficult to keep everyone, have everyone healthy, and continually replenish the talent.

An all time elite QB will always be the way to go if you’re lucky enough to get one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Yu Weed Tard (Post 14058433)

Sack of ****ing shit.

I agree with the OP, whole heartedly. :harumph:

I have to wonder, though. If he had not lined up offsides and KC went on to win the SB, it's highly unlikely they would have (finally) gotten rid of the abysmal Bob Sutton. That might have actually hurt the chances for a dynasty more in the long run.

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 15186750)

No question.

It's just a lot harder to stack bricks to form a barrier than it is to drop a big ****ing stone in the way.

Just a few bricks break down here and there and the whole wall crumbles. Meanwhile that big ol' stone's gonna take a lot of load before it fails.

Why am I seeing this mother ****er's name again on ChiefsPlanet????????

Shoulda bought a Toyota.