Virginia Tech and NC St are bigger football draws and the SEC is a football first conference. UNC will fight to include Duke if there is a slimmest chance of that being a possibility. I don't see the SEC interested in Duke. Virginia and UNC consider themselves academic elites, and more in line with the B!G in those regards. They are also both more committed to the ACC then NC St and V Tech are and will hold out longer to try and make that work.

That's because they were the low-hanging fruit. Now, the entire conference may be within reach. Before this latest shake-up, North Catholics and Virginia looked unattainable. The SEC may offer NC State and Virginia Tech, but out will only be after North Carolina and Virginia say no.

Meh, both UNC and UVA are extremely more valuable brands than either Va Tech or NC State. The SEC has two more possible seats left and they aren't expanding again if that's all that is available.

Fans are way too focused on who is and is not a football school. The SEC Network needs content for 12 months out of the year, not just the football season (which it already has plenty of). UNC and UVA have great all-around athletic departments that would provide a ton of content during winter, spring, and summer.

Finally, North Carolina is thoroughly Southern, and their fans will want absolutely nothing to do with a Midwest conference with trips to Michigan, Ohio, Minnesota, etc. If UNC leaves the ACC it will be for the SEC.

^ This. The SEC did not go after Missouri and aTm because of their football prowess. If it were strictly about football they would have gone after WVU instead.

Yes, but there wasn't a football option in Missouri other than Missouri, now was there? By the way, I'm perfectly fine with the SEC going after UNC and UVA. I think they will resist more and hold out for B!G offer, and depending on what the SEC timetable is, it may not be worth it. UVA may be the more prestigious university, but most of the polls I have seen doesn't seem to indicate they draw very well for collegiate athletics competition. UNC is more of a toss up, but they have that Duke connection, and I don't think they are going to surrender it until they absolutely have to. There is more of a chance the the B!G would take Duke than the SEC in my opinion.

I would be pretty surprised to see one of the big four conferences offer both Duke and Carolina. That would give you two schools from the same state with no football draw.

Was there other options in WV? Don't even say Marshall as they are not even worth discussing for these realignment purposes. They did not go after WVU, but Missouri instead. Why did they do it? For the market. It was a money decision, not a football one. That is why UVA and UNC are bigger targets for the SEC than VT and NCSU. I agree that the SEC does not want Duke either.

I would too, but UNC will hold out for it. Then its just a matter if the SEC is willing to hold out as well. I don't know their time table for getting more market for their network. There are more academic advantages (and possibly financial advantages) to the B!G. I don't think the SEC will delay too long and risk going to war with the B!G over it. So why not just grab NC St., get into the market, and rest with the fact the football program there is stronger?

Because NC State will be there.

You're starting to mix situations. Originally, it was why would the SEC take V Tech as opposed to UVA. You thought UVA brought more visibility to the arena than V Tech, which I would dispute. UVA is clearly the better academic institution, but in the two revenue sports, UVA has been quite irrelevant for a very long time.

V Tech is the sports draw. If there was a "Missouri Tech" and Missouri had been performing like UVA while the Tech school was like V Tech, then it wouldn't be a slam dunk Missouri would be the school they invite, especially if this fictional"M Tech" was located closer to St. Louis. Missouri had the markets, but they also had another former Big 12 school that was already joining. There were lots of reasons for the SEC to go that way.

Wait are you telling me that Carolina would abandon its traditional rival Duke for a better conference and more money? Blasphemy!

True, but like I stated, I don't know what the SEC timetable is for adding market share. They want in the DC and Carolina markets. My feeling is UVA and UNC will hold out for the B!G or keep the ACC together. I don't think the SEC wants to be viewed as the conference pining after certain institutions who finally had to "relent". They want institutions who want them. That fits V Tech and NC St. better than it does UVA and UNC.

I'm not saying it won't be UVA and UNC, I'm just trying to look at motivations from those schools perspectives. Also, UNC's football program is going on probation.

So, let me ask you, why do you think UNC and UVA would want to jump? Every indication screams thei commitment to the ACC. If the B!G is still a possible option, what do you think changes their mind?

Sources: ACC schools starting to put out feelers to Big 12

Chip Brown
Orangebloods.com

Two Big 12 sources told Orangebloods.com Tuesday there has been informal contact from Florida State, Clemson, Virginia Tech and Miami with the Big 12 about possible expansion.

If Florida State and Clemson leave, and the SEC wants to expand, Tech and State will likely be begging to leave. If Slive can say, "look guys, we're taking two more schools from your conference...do you want to be the school to join the SEC or get left behind?" It's a pretty compelling case.

Honest question: have you ever been to North Carolina?

If so, what in the world makes you think the culture of the state and its fans are more Midwest than Southern?

University leaders make these decision, but they need approval from fans or it will be a massive failure. UNC fans want absolutely nothing to do with a Midwestern Conference, losing all access to the Southeast region. The CIC is valuable, but it's not worth losing all sense of identity. UNC to the Big Ten makes no sense at all.