Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I love Chris Jones to death, didn’t mind if the Chiefs let him go earlier in the year but he’s made it a lot harder now.
I still think you make the tough decision to keep Sneed and let Jones go. Spags will figure out how to get pressure with different guys. Besides, aren’t we all looking forward to opposing fans telling us the chiefs are done because we lost Chris Jones only only to keep winning titles in different ways? |
I was against giving into Joles but whatever. We need to keep both of them.
|
My thoughts on Jones over in the draft forum:
Quote:
And then you can use restructures as Taylor/Mahomes are willing to clear another $40 million as needed to look into adding more weapons/OT help. It's not a brutally difficult path forward to keep this roster largely intact and even boost it in some key areas. It's not my normal path, but pursuing a 3-peat aint a normal scenario. |
Just do the Denver move and promise him a ton of money to be a consultant after he retires.
|
Quote:
The cap controls the salaries at the high end; the few dozen guys every year that can really push the market. But there are literally thousands of NFL players and for most of them, the spending floor determines how much they'll be able to make. And if the NFLPA thinks they're not getting a fair share of the revenue split, then they should stop trading capital in negotiations for fewer practice days and lighter drug testing. I think you're overstating the complaints of the NFLPA here. |
Quote:
And in regards to the money part, why shouldn't they be paid handsomely? The money is there...it's the biggest money making machine in all of entertainment. If not the players, who should those dollars go to? And who are you to say how much money someone needs? Many of these players are earning money for not only themselves, but entire family trees present and future. They are worth exactly what someone will pay them and they'd be stupid not to maximize those earnings in the very short window they have to acquire that wealth. If a player has made 9 figures and is on the tail end of their career I suppose I can understand taking a little less to stay somewhere they prefer, but thats a small number of guys in this league. |
Do you just tag Jones if his agents still want to be smarmy little ****s and be done with it? Veach was willing to give him 2 more years at 27.5 million each almost fully guaranteed. The tag number is in that ballpark, and easily affordable if they really are going to restructure Mahomes. This is of course assuming we sign Sneed to a LTD.
|
Quote:
Second, the whole "they are paying for their family family" blah blah, dude STFU. No family linage needs 100 million dollars to "get by". And second, all the players I talk to have been smart with their money and don't feel like their NFL careers were meant to setup their great grandkids for prosperity. You're just repeating a bunch of nonsense most of you who just jerk off online to this stuff do. Stay in your lane and pipe down. |
I'm not trying to shit on anyone's parade but you just have to look at the mathematics and reality of the situation in some way and realize it's just not overly feasible to keep both Sneed and Jones. You can only back-end so much money in reality on a deal. You can only ignore so much when it comes to the other FAs you have to sign/re-sign.
I posted already that you can get 28.7 by fullying pushing Mahomes' 35.9m roster bonus into signing bonus (1/5th will still end up on this year's cap). If you keep Jones, you just ate up the bulk of that. So basically, call that Jones + 2024 In-Season Operating Cash. Everything else you do from that point is reliant upon the cap space you already know that you have, which is approximately 24m + 12m for cutting MVS. Now, maybe you can manage something with Omenihu and pick up around 5m there. You aren't gaining much in probably much of anything else you do and then there are things you just don't want to do like pushing money with Thuney or Kelce. Now, a segment of the money you have is going to sign your draft class. Right now our rookie pool is 8.3m with a top-51 valuation somewhere around 2.8m So let's just call a minimum of 3m is going to be added to our cap liabilities so now you are at about 33m in space. You have 5 ERFAs and you usually keep those because they are cheap. So take off 4.5m for those guys. You're at 28.5m. You have 19 other UFA/RFA players. Every UFA pretty much costs 1.1m or more. If you are counting our draft picks to take over some of those spots, then you need to sign 13 players, at least. That automatically has you down to 14m in remaining cap IF you were only signing vet min guys to fill those 13 holes. Now, we all know you aren't going to spend only vet min on every single one. So, how are you finding a way to fit one of the best CBs in the league in there? The truth is, you're probably not. Sneed would have to take a massive first-year discount on his contract and backload the deal. Essentially he'd be making his signing bonus this year. What do you think his odds are of upping that if he hits the market? I bet they are more than good. You aren't franchising Sneed either. That hit is 18.4m. It's keep Jones or keep Sneed and maybe bolster some other spots a bit more. You have to pick your poison. It's really that simple. |
Quote:
|
It's not as much as Sneed being ok doing it as it is Clark being open to writing a big check.
|
Quote:
|
No dragging it out with Chris Jones this offseason would be my hope.
Either he is willing to work with the Chiefs to stay or if he is intent on getting $30+ million AAV then the Chiefs can move on. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.