O.city |
08-26-2019 01:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
(Post 14410419)
That ultimately seems to make the most sense, they just don't seem to be in a rush to get there..
I'm starting to get a little O.Citied (consider this my petition to have 'concerned' auto-correct to 'o.citied') that they don't have any idea what they want to do with any of these guys. We're awfully far down the road to not really have ANY of your starting LBs set.
Look at it this way - is there any combination of Hitchens/Lee/Wilson/Ragland that they could start as starting LBs in a base formation that would just surprised the hell out of you? I mean apart from maybe Lee in the middle with Hitchens at Sam and Ragland at Will.
But that's about as weird as I can make it and even that wouldn't really floor me. They just seem to be throwing all 4 of those guys at all 3 positions just to see what the hell might stick.
It's either a positive (versatility!!!) or a sign that they're still searching for anything that works. Given the fairly spotty track records of all of them, the latter sure seems more likely.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca
(Post 14410424)
It strikes me as they have no idea what those guys are so they're just seeing what they can do, also the depth is kinda shitty.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Northman
(Post 14410436)
Ragland looked better at SAM vs San Fran than he ever has playing MLB.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
(Post 14410444)
Could Damien Wilson be....good?
He's not a dynamo out there or anything but it sure does seem hard to spot him making mistakes out there. He seems awfully steady.
|
Yeah, i thought Ragland looked atleast competent at the SAM spot, he can blitz a little there too.
But as DJ said here, Wilson has just looked...good. Physical, fast, etc.
Just put him at the Sam spot, Hitch in the middle and Lee out wide and go from there.
|