LMAO
Exactly the case. With or without links...

Yep, but wanted so badly to be right.

Sure, but it's not going to go well for the prosecution if they can't even determine who actually did it. They're not in the business of losing cases.

Most domestic violence cases are pretty reliant on witness testimony to begin with. When there isn’t an immediate report of an incident and the victim is a toddler, it gets really thin/flimsy unless there’s a reliable witness who describes what happened.

Obviously that is not the case here.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So one clarification on the Hill article and his contract. He can&#39;t sign until after his third year. The sides, however, can discuss numbers and concepts of a new deal. That is what I was referring to in the article. I wasn&#39;t clear and I will own that.</p>&mdash; The Chiefs Kingdom (Ver 2.0) (@1_ChiefsKingdom) <a href="https://twitter.com/1_ChiefsKingdom/status/1142962902187384832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This isn't domestic violence its child abuse. Evidence of said abuse shouldn't be hard to come by, You are way over thinking this.

The broken arm issue has been resolved from everything I can tell, there is nothing else other than some level of bruising and welts which obviously aren't enough to do anything from a charge standpoint.

The reality is the biggest evidence against Hill is an incident from 5 years ago that has no actual relevance to this case.

Thats not what he said in a reply, dude is already back tracking. Good grief.

Clarification is not backtracking.

This! :clap:

I read that wrong I thought it was that Carrington clown changing his opinion on what the major flaw in the article was.

I am at a loss why no one seems to think this text exchange is BY FAR the most important "evidence" we have available regarding this case.

The broken arm has been shown to be consistent with an accidental fall.

The police being called to the house occured when Tyreek called them and he was not even present.

The audio tape sounds bad if taken out of context but not so much when listening to all of it.

Is there some other hard evidence that I am missing here?

There's a lot of skepticism that the texts were "natural" rather than sent for the specific purpose of creating a trail for the story they were hoping to portray. I'd love to see a little more context around them.

The people who matter do.

That's why everything was dropped.

Now't just a matter of reversing the verdict in the court of public opinion, which sadly will take a lot longer because people are willfully stupid.

Ask Terez. He’s been on this case since day 1 and has done great reporting on this situation

I can see that... but what other "evidence' has been put forth? So far I've seen a whole lot of absolutely nothing.