I saw 2 years $15.6 million, which includes the incentives. And his "incentives" could just be we sustain an injury to a starting OL and he comes in and plays a bunch. Boom. Incentives met. Erving gets paid.

It’s pretty hilarious that CP is freaking out over this. Sam Mellinger reported that the Chiefs are paying him $10 million over 3 years. If true, his average is $3.3 million per year.

That would make him the 47th highest paid tackle in the league.

I mean, don't you think those incentives would be pretty tough to hit, even with an injury?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is very much a bias tweet... but Cam Erving (if he reaches his incentives) is getting paid more than my brother on APY. It’s not Cam’s fault but it’s time for the Chiefs to redo Mitch’s deal and give him a raise.</p>&mdash; Geoff Schwartz (@geoffschwartz) <a href="https://twitter.com/geoffschwartz/status/1037058361597079553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 4, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Again, "if he meets the incentives" means he's playing snaps.

Only reason he's playing snaps is if we get an injury to another guy.

This isn't like we're paying somebody to meet performance benchmarks, which ends up being a good thing for the team.

What the hell are the performance incentives for an OL? Pancake blocks?

Even stuff like "sacks/pressures allowed" is an advanced metric. The Chiefs won't use that to determine Erving's value.

And you're ignoring the fact that Runkc implied that Erving is more valuable than Fulton.

The guy gives us a solid backup for ANY position on the line. Get over it you dumbasses. It was a smart move .

Except for the money part.

Mitchell Schwartz got a 5 year 33 million dollar contract with 20 million guarantees. Cam Erving is going to make 10 million over the next three years.

These deals are exactly the same. Dumbass. :rolleyes:

I would think the snap counts or starts or whatever, would be pretty tough to hit.

LMAO @ anyone who is surprised. Did you idiots not witness the Peters trade? Do you, somehow, not recall him signing Amerson?

At half the cost as Fulton? You bet your ****ing ass he’s more valuable at that price plus he can play tackle.

I can only imagine the meltdown CP would have if we gave Fulton that contract. LMAO

Can we move on from the Peters thing already? Reid is the biggest players coach in the NFL. If he was ready to move on from Peters, well, that's pretty damning.

Please do not take photographs.

FAX

The pro-bowl talent CB on a rookie deal at a position of incredible need? Sure, lets just completely ignore that incredibly relevant piece of inconvenient data.

All that and they still traded him.

So either they're extremely incompetent or there was a reason they were ok with it.