Bowser |
02-03-2017 08:52 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
(Post 12724053)
Sure seems to be alot of media attention on the Chiefs QB situation, Romo to KC, and Smith to the Jets type of stuff lately. If KC can get more trading Smith to the Jets than they give up getting Romo from Dallas, I'd be pretty damn happy.
If the Chiefs do trade for Romo, they need to restructure and retain Foles.
Another question... would anyone entertain Johnny Manziel on a 1-year, vet min, prove it type of deal? I wouldn't mind a Romo/Foles/Manziel QB group heading into next year. If the draft presents a good option, get him, you're not tied to Manziel.
|
No to Romo, hell no **** no to Manziel. Johnny is damaged goods between the ears, and I would be absolutely shocked if he got another shot in the NFL. I mean, he got cut by the Cleveland Browns. Think about that for a minute.
If we could have gotten five years ago Romo, then absolutely. We traded for Montana when he was 37, but Tony Romo ain't no Joe Montana, and he's even more beat up than Joe was when he came here. Just say no to aging vets on the downside of their career (and personally, I have a feeling Romo ends up in Arizona. We'll see).
The best case scenario for us would be to trade Alex to the Jets, restructure Foles and give him the reins this year, and draft a legit future starter at QB to let him sit and learn under Andy who is a whiz of a coach with QB's. That's a ton of moving pieces, but that seems to me to be our best bet going forward to me (thus ensuring none of it will happen).
|