ChiefsPlanet
Page 106 of 119 « First 65696102103104105 106 107108109110116 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Tony Romo rumor (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305387)

BigCatDaddy 03-08-2017 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12774356)
Who has the better overall stats?
Stats?? Stats? You mean those fantasy football numbers guys like Ben, Rodgers, Brady, and Ryan put up? Pssshhh ....worthless

Mile High Mania 03-08-2017 04:34 PM
I don't think the issues in 2016 were Trevor's .. I think he played well considering it was his first time to start and he's a 2nd year player.

The OL was horrible... we couldn't run with consistency. Oh and very little threat from the TE position. A young QB, hell most QBs need those 3 things to succeed.

It's all about the basics, fix the lines and you improve a great deal. If they sign Romo, they must really fix the OL issues... otherwise it's a total bonehead move.

crazycoffey 03-08-2017 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12774070)
Am I the only not afraid of Romo? He blundered numerous times over the years when he was younger and not damaged. This is a move of desperation by Denver while they have a small window with their defense intact. I believe it starts to desolve after 2017.

He's not the massively hard worker Manning was at building his connections with his wr's. New offense and new coaching staff will not just come together overnight.
You're not alone.

Mile High Mania 03-08-2017 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 12774430)
Who cares who Denver has at QB? This year will be KC's 3rd win in a row in Denver, and by the end of the season we'll have beat that ass 5 times in a row.
I doubt it... it's possible, just not probable.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-08-2017 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 12774256)
I know as Chiefs fans we have to cling to any little thing we can, but holy shit this is pathetic.
You aren't a Chief fan, troll

Mother****erJones 03-08-2017 07:54 PM
I'm afraid of Romo because Chiefs. That's why. This franchise is utterly pathetic and gutless. Cowardly franchise that'll never win another super bowl until they take some serious risks at the QB position.

okcchief 03-08-2017 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12774414)
Those **** ups would been easier to overcome if that offense had any line and running game.



That sorry line was the primary reason for those **** ups.



The Chiefs offense would have better with Semian under center.


Correct


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-08-2017 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12773661)
Chiefs fans can make light of the situation all they want - The Broncos acquiring Romo would put them back in the Darling spot light the NFL loves so much. What a great story to have Dallas face the Romo-led Broncos in the next Super Bowl. You all know it's going to happen. The Chiefs don't have enough clout in the league to get these favours.
http://sports.cbsimg.net/u/photos/fo...mg24575799.jpg

"Yawn, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"

-National Football League

SAUTO 03-08-2017 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12774233)
So Romo is Manning now? Other than a bunch less playoff wins and one less Superbowl ring, how are they similar again? They don't even have the same playing style.
Posted via Mobile Device
Two less rings, right?

-King- 03-08-2017 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12774828)
Two less rings, right?
I was talking about at the time broncos got him.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 03-08-2017 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12774771)
I'm afraid of Romo because Chiefs. That's why. This franchise is utterly pathetic and gutless. Cowardly franchise that'll never win another super bowl until they take some serious risks at the QB position.
This is stupid logic. So they should pick up a 37 year old QB with major injury concerns and the same playoff wins as Alex Smith just to take risks? And they suck because they're not willing to take those risks?
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 03-08-2017 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12774875)
I was talking about at the time broncos got him.
Posted via Mobile Device
Makes sense then, :D

Mother****erJones 03-08-2017 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12774881)
This is stupid logic. So they should pick up a 37 year old QB with major injury concerns and the same playoff wins as Alex Smith just to take risks? And they suck because they're not willing to take those risks?
Posted via Mobile Device
It's not necessarily Romo. It's any QB they don't take risks on. They take the "safe bet" 100% of the time.

Stop with the Alex Smith shit. He's garbage. 15 TDs last season. Shitty in the playoffs. He's done

New World Order 03-08-2017 10:16 PM
Let's take a look at Alex Smith's playoff highlights:

https://i.redd.it/m1nxd4dxd6ay.gif

Reerun_KC 03-08-2017 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12775046)
Let's take a look at Alex Smith's playoff highlights:

https://i.redd.it/m1nxd4dxd6ay.gif
:clap:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.
Page 106 of 119 « First 65696102103104105 106 107108109110116 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.