2nd rnd. Geno, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon gone...

[Mr_Tomahawk]

Given Dorseys comments the other day about not being a clear cut QB at #1....lets assume we do not draft a QB in the 1st and say Geno, Wilson, Glennon, and Barkley are gone by the 2nd rnd.

Who do you think we go after [qb] and in what rnd?

[PGM]

Originally Posted by O.city

Here is what we do


@nfldraftscout: If #Chiefs want my opinion: Sign/trade for Alex Smith. Draft Matt Scott in Round 5. Cut Cassell. Sign Bowe. Draft Joeckel.

Here is what you do draftscout: run face first into an AIDS forest

[O.city]

Originally Posted by milkman

So, just so I understand, you worry about Geno's sideline frustration when things ren't going well, which only occured a couple times, and see that as a red flag which leads to questions for you about his viability as the #1 overall, but a guy whose maturity issues are Leafesque is worth a mid second rounder?

This is what I don't understand from fans. Do t want the best qb from a bad class but the 5 best?

[SNR]

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

Yes, they would rather the top QB goes to one of those huge market teams like the Carolina Panthers...

The media was largely against the Cam Newton pick all the way up until the final week of the draft when they just ****ing accepted it and moved on.

They'll throw the exact same childish tantrum if the Chiefs are set on taking a QB at 1.

[Dave Lane]

Originally Posted by MahiMike

Personally, I think only 2 of those QB's go in round 1. But given your scenario, with Glennon gone, we don't grab a QB until later. A camp arm.

Alex Smith, Nick Foles or Matt Flynn will be our QB next year.

Much as I hate to say it it'd just as soon hit the field With Cassel or Stanzi as with any of those losers. What a horrific trio.

I might prefer Tyson Jackson running the wildcat.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Makers Mark. And Im in AA...
Posted via Mobile Device

[Cmd'r&Chief]

We should hire Scott ***** as a college scout and let him run our draft board.

[KCrockaholic]

If that happens don't take one at all this year. Just **** the QB position once again like we always do.

Why get the 5th best QB in an already supposedly "weak" class? It makes no sense at all.

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Take Tyler Bray so we can enjoy the epic meltdown. We might as well be entertained if we're not gonna win.

[Setsuna]

Bray will be gone by the time you draft. So don't even.

[RunKC]

Ryan Nassib

[Saul Good]

I would take Joekel in the first so we can move Albert to Guard. Then, I would take a guard in the second so we can move Albert to Center.

[Bo's Pelini]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

I would take Joekel in the first so we can move Albert to Guard. Then, I would take a guard in the second so we can move Albert to Center.

We can sign waters and he can play center.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

We can sign waters and he can play center.

Then we can move Albert to TE.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

We can sign waters and he can play center.

Then we could finally get Albert to QB. A LT at QB is a true-fan's wet dream.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by milkman

So, just so I understand, you worry about Geno's sideline frustration when things ren't going well, which only occured a couple times, and see that as a red flag which leads to questions for you about his viability as the #1 overall, but a guy whose maturity issues are Leafesque is worth a mid second rounder?

I didn't choose Bray over Smith. But I might consider Bray a better value in the 3rd or late 2nd than Smith at the top of the draft. But I won't know until the interviews and the combine are in. If Bray's interview convinces the Chiefs brass that his "immaturity" was only a college phase I'll defer to Andy Reid.