"What difference does it make".......Hillary

[Chief Henry]

Only four dead Americans Hillary/Obama...

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by FishingRod

I tend to agree with you but believe it cuts both ways. Of all the civil and international issues that the Left demonized Bush for, Obama has continued or expanded the overwhelming majority of them but now it is not a problem.
Likewise not a shit was given by the majority of the right when Bush was in office about overspeanding.

True. Hence my point about them being 90% the same.

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by patteeu

That doesn't really make her answer any better. What difference does lying to the American people and placing the blame for four dead Americans on a filmmaker who had nothing to do with it make? Is she serious? Are you serious?

You mean like how Mitt and the republican media machine were pointing fingers and placing blame in all directions, literally when this incident was just hours old and they had absolutely new no clue what actually happened? You mean like how they've continued to shift blame from one source to another to another just to keep the story alive in their 24/7 months-long Benghazi hammering?

[RNR]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

You mean like how Mitt and the republican media machine were pointing fingers and placing blame in all directions, literally when this incident was just hours old and they had absolutely new no clue what actually happened? You mean like how they've continued to shift blame from one source to another to another just to keep the story alive in their 24/7 months-long Benghazi hammering?

you are pathetic~

[|Zach|]

Originally Posted by Comrade Crapski

Big fan of getting 4 more years of butthurt photoshops from people marginalized and forgotten on the fringe.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by Loneiguana

I don't understand this question. Either or it's was a bogus reason to go to war.

The problem is the Bush stood in front of places like the U.N. and the American public and lied his ass off about the intelligence. (not to mention being the first president to put not one, but two wars on a credit card).

It is a false equivalence to compare what a President says at the end of intelligence gathering and presenting those findings in front of the U.N. to the information giving during an on going investigation to satisfy media retards.

Not to mention one lie led to the Death of 4,000 Americans, the other "Lie" was on the motivation of people who killed four Americans. There is a big difference.

The first sentence of this post might be true. The rest is hogwash picked up, no doubt, from the liberal media bubble.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

You mean like how Mitt and the republican media machine were pointing fingers and placing blame in all directions, literally when this incident was just hours old and they had absolutely new no clue what actually happened? You mean like how they've continued to shift blame from one source to another to another just to keep the story alive in their 24/7 months-long Benghazi hammering?

No.

[|Zach|]

Originally Posted by patteeu

The first sentence of this post might be true. The rest is hogwash picked up, no doubt, from the liberal media bubble.

Every time I read something like this I just think about all you right leaning assholes who don't care what goes in one ear and out the other backed up by bullshit right leaning outlets that mocked all the information that turned out to be dead on in November.

You guys deserve your failure.

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

you are pathetic~

Originally Posted by patteeu

No.

Solid arguments. I'm really starting to see the light.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Every time I read something like this I just think about all you right leaning assholes who don't care what goes in one ear and out the other backed up by bullshit right leaning outlets that mocked all the information that turned out to be dead on in November.

You guys deserve your failure.

You don't think there is a liberal leaning media?

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Solid arguments. I'm really starting to see the light.

I gave you a straight answer to your yes/no question. No argument was called for.

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Every time I read something like this I just think about all you right leaning assholes who don't care what goes in one ear and out the other backed up by bullshit right leaning outlets that mocked all the information that turned out to be dead on in November.

You guys deserve your failure.

Most of my family are a bunch of low information, FNC-consuming baby-boomers. To a person they were completely shocked that Obama won the election.

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by mlyonsd

You don't think there is a liberal leaning media?

If CNN leans left, it's about 10 times less than FOXNews leans right. There is no lefty equivalent of talk radio.

We should all agree to get all of our news from only The Economist for a year, just to see what happens. I bet everyone would be in a much better frame of mind.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Most of my family are a bunch of low information, FNC-consuming baby-boomers. To a person they were completely shocked that Obama won the election.

Given his total incompetence so was I.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Every time I read something like this I just think about all you right leaning assholes who don't care what goes in one ear and out the other backed up by bullshit right leaning outlets that mocked all the information that turned out to be dead on in November.

You guys deserve your failure.

As if the November election answers all questions about whose analysis on political issues is correct. That's a ridiculous take.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

If CNN leans left, it's about 10 times less than FOXNews leans right. There is no lefty equivalent of talk radio.

What about the networks?