I Predict The 2013 QB's To Be

[Marada]

The Chiefs recognise that there needs to be a shakeout at the QB position. I'll go out on a limb and predict that the QB roster for 2013 will be, in no certain order.

1- Geno Smith I think the Chiefs will trade down about 10 spots, find him available, take him and pick up an extra pick.

2- Ricki Stanzi The guy must have some talent to remain on the roster. There is a history of skill position players blooming when they actually get a fair chance.

3- Alex Tanney Just on the strength of his arm he can make it in the NFL. Best part is we already have him.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

I'll lifelong ban bet you that Stanzi doesn't start a single regular season NFL game this year...on ANY team.

Why would I do that? Nobody is going to start him this year because nobody knows if he can play, because the geniuses in our front office believe that you should play to win every game and never play guys at the tail end of a losing season so you can evaluate them in an actual game environment. Even when we're losing 300 to 3.

Originally Posted by stonedstooge

Heard at least 2 national dudes talk about Reid fixing Casshole today

Nothing but Fluff. The second coming of Donovan McNabb is in this draft, you bet your ass the Walrus snags him.

[CaliforniaChief]

1. Geno Smith

2. Jason Campbell

3. E.J. Manuel

[CaliforniaChief]

People in the media don't know anything about the situation. I heard one guy talk about Romeo coming back as a DC. I almost crashed my truck laughing.

[jd1020]

Quinn played behind the same "shitty" line and didn't look anywhere near as incompetent as Stanzi.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief

1. Geno Smith

2. Jason Campbell

3. E.J. Manuel

That's a lot of chocolate.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief

People in the media don't know anything about the situation. I heard one guy talk about Romeo coming back as a DC. I almost crashed my truck laughing.

He was seen walking into the the Chiefs compound today, completely serious.

He must have forgotten to pickup that wrapper.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by Exoter175

It isn't hard to google it yourself, hey look, first thing I found on it.

Perhaps the second thing you find will actually support your initial claim.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Perhaps the second thing you find will actually support your initial claim.

That made no sense.........

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Exoter175

That made no sense.........

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

Are you capable of saying anything intelligent?

Orton was already on the roster nursing an injured finger. The only reason Stanzi was considered was because he wasn't sure that Orton would be ready and Palko started his last game when Haley went bye bye.

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by Exoter175

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

Your question answers itself.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by Exoter175

That made no sense.........

If the firs thing I found supported my claim, why would I need to find a second?

It made perfect sense if you're following what you're typing.

According to you, RAC wanted to start Stanzi, but ***** said, "**** that."

OK, prove it. A link stating that RAC was contemplating Stanzi in week 15, which was complete bullshit had you actually listened to the presser that week, doesn't prove that ***** pulled the plug.

***** said no, even though RAC had already benched *****'s son? Makes sense. It's logical, despite the total lack of evidence.

[CaliforniaChief]

I'm a Hawkeyes fan. I loved Stanzi. I loved watching the Chiefs draft him. There's no way anyone can seriously and with any hint of intelligence believe that he has an NFL future.

This ain't your Ferentz's Chiefs.

[MahiMike]

I could see Cassel as a very decent backup but not in KC.

I'm guessing we get Dorsey ergo we sign Matt Flynn.

1. Flynn
2. Quinn
3. Tyler Bray

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by MahiMike

I could see Cassel as a very decent backup but not in KC.

I'm guessing we get Dorsey ergo we sign Matt Flynn.

1. Flynn
2. Quinn
3. Tyler Bray

One man's trash is another mans trash is another mans treasure.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by MahiMike

I could see Cassel as a very decent backup but not in KC.

I'm guessing we get Dorsey ergo we sign Matt Flynn.

1. Flynn
2. Quinn
3. Tyler Bray

. We might get Flynn, but there's really no way in **** that Quinn stays on this roster as the #2 QB.

Hell, I'd be completely fine with a QB of Cassel's caliber as the backup. His contract means this won't happen, but he's still ridiculously better than Quinn.