Climate change

[chefs fan in omaha]

What is it? Why tax it?

Since global warming is all bull, what exactly is climate change?

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

Left wing clown We agree probably 75% of the time. You just go all nutso the other 25% and act like anyone left of you is insane.
Al Gore has nothing to do with it, and you even mentioning him like this shows how shallow you are on this. If you don't like Al Gore, listen to the climatologists.

Who only exist and have altars to one Al Gore.

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Who only exist and have altars to one Al Gore.

Climatologists only exist to Al Gore? Start making sense.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

Climatologists only exist thanks to Al Gore? Start making sense.

fyp, and more to the point because of the money you can make scaring the shit out of people. To replace GOD they have to use a non existant scare tactic...global warming!!! it will be the death of us all!

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

fyp, and more to the point because of the money you can make scaring the shit out of people. To replace GOD they have to use a non existant scare tactic...global warming!!! it will be the death of us all!

I see, he invented climatologists. Probably right after inventing the internet, right? And replacing God, too? I didn't realize that part. Start making sense.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by cosmo20002

I see, he invented climatologists. Probably right after inventing the internet, right? And replacing God, too? I didn't realize that part. Start making sense.

It makes perfect sense, the left needs a god since they don't believe in a higher power(for the most part) so everyone can get emotional and tithe to the church of clymatology.

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

It makes perfect sense, the left needs a god since they don't believe in a higher power(for the most part) so everyone can get emotional and tithe to the church of clymatology.

And...that makes absolutely no sense.

[chefs fan in omaha]

Originally Posted by cdcox

Best science.

Even BEP's hero from MIT Richard Lindzen is on board with the fact that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and that the amounts humans have released to the atmosphere are enough to cause warming. He just thinks the negative feedback mechanisms in the atmosphere (namely clouds) are strong enough to resist the warming influences. The vast majority of climate scientists disagree with him. He has had to back track on some of his earlier papers. His theories are also discredited by the fact that the earth's temperature keeps going up, which wouldn't happen if his theory was correct.

Yeah, unfortunately the temps aren't rising in any statistically significant amount. The whole 2 degree thing isn't going to happen, 1 degree rise at best in the next 100 years

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by chefs fan in omaha

So nobody can explain it, but we need to tax it?

Tax climate change?

Really, what on earth are you talking about?

Really.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

Tax climate change?

Really, what on earth are you talking about?

Really.

Carbon credits? Climate exchange? perhaps you've heard these terms?

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by chefs fan in omaha

Yeah, unfortunately the temps aren't rising in any statistically significant amount. The whole 2 degree thing isn't going to happen, 1 degree rise at best in the next 100 years

Reference?

Temperatures have already increased by 0.8 degree C (over 1 degree F), with 2/3 of this coming since 1975, and the slope getting steeper more recently.

Here's my reference:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...ecadaltemp.php

Do you know more than NASA?

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by cdcox

Reference?

Temperatures have already increased by 0.8 degree C (over 1 degree F), with 2/3 of this coming since 1975, and the slope getting steeper more recently.

Here's my reference:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...ecadaltemp.php

Do you know more than NASA?

I don't see anything so scary about it, really .8 degrees in 37 years?

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

I don't see anything so scary about it, really .8 degrees in 37 years?

So you agree human activity can alter the climate by these levels?

[Direckshun]

There's no way human activity can alter the climate.

And even if it can, there's no way it can alter it by that much.

And even if it could, there's nothing alarming about it.

And even if there was, there's nothing we can do about it.

And even if there is, it wouldn't do much.

And even if it did, it would cause too much economic collateral damage / be ineffectually implemented / inexcusably rob us of freedom to pursue.

Therefore, I am opposed to climate change legislation.

Does that about sum it up?

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by cdcox

So you agree human activity can alter the climate by these levels?

Not really unless you include the medieval warming period which was by all accounts MUCH warmer but that would destroy all of the current theories.

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Not really unless you include the medieval warming period which was by all accounts MUCH warmer but that would destroy all of the current theories.

Research before you post and provide references to outlandish statements such as this one. Completely false.