As of right now, cdcox's software says the team most likely to win the Super Bowl...

[DaFace]

...is the Denver Broncos. I'm going to be sick if that happens.

[DaKCMan AP]

1. I bet at this point in the season the Giants & Packers weren't favored to win the Super Bowl the past 2 years.

2. I fully expect Manning to have a typical choke job come playoff time.

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

1. I bet at this point in the season the Giants & Packers weren't favored to win the Super Bowl the past 2 years.

2. I fully expect Manning to have a typical choke job come playoff time.

Further, Baltimore was the first team with a winning record that Dungver has played in 10 weeks - and that defense is in shambles. Broken down Suggs, no Ray Lewis, Dannell Ellerbe, Bernard Pollard, Jameel McClain.

They finish the season against Cleveland & KC.

In fact - all season Dungver will have only played 4 teams (including these beat-down Ravens on a 3 game slide) with a winning record.

Their record in those games? 1-3.

Frauds.

[durtyrute]

Originally Posted by Guru

The fix is in.

This and I'm calling Denver as well

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Further, Baltimore was the first team with a winning record that Dungver has played in 10 weeks - and that defense is in shambles. Broken down Suggs, no Ray Lewis, Dannell Ellerbe, Bernard Pollard, Jameel McClain.

They finish the season against Cleveland & KC.

In fact - all season Dungver will have only played 4 teams (including these beat-down Ravens on a 3 game slide) with a winning record.

Their record in those games? 1-3.

Frauds.

That's awesome.

[Dayze]

after reading the fixed for profit thread, I couldn't help but laugh at all the BS calls around the league.

alas...the holding and PI calls keep ****ing up games.

[Mile High Mania]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Further, Baltimore was the first team with a winning record that Dungver has played in 10 weeks - and that defense is in shambles. Broken down Suggs, no Ray Lewis, Dannell Ellerbe, Bernard Pollard, Jameel McClain.

They finish the season against Cleveland & KC.

In fact - all season Dungver will have only played 4 teams (including these beat-down Ravens on a 3 game slide) with a winning record.

Their record in those games? 1-3.

Frauds.

All true, but they won. Denver's not 100% either, but it's totally your right to ignore it. OL, RB, DEF - they're all missing key starters, but they're doing enough to win.

Denver played the bulk of their tough games in the first 5... they finished 2-3, so be it. I think it's silly to compare this team now to what they were in week 5 - especially on DEF and ST and say it's the same team. Feel free to do it, though.

Denver is in line for the #2 seed... they didn't set up that schedule, it's not their fault that KC, SD, OAK and others suck. They defeated a testy Tampa team a few weeks ago before they started to fall apart. Most here still expected Baltimore to beat 'em.

It is what it is and the proof is in the finish, so we'll see what happens in the playoffs. Send NE to Denver and I really like that one in round 2.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

There will be no Manning Bowl.

[Chief Gump]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Further, Baltimore was the first team with a winning record that Dungver has played in 10 weeks - and that defense is in shambles. Broken down Suggs, no Ray Lewis, Dannell Ellerbe, Bernard Pollard, Jameel McClain.

They finish the season against Cleveland & KC.

In fact - all season Dungver will have only played 4 teams (including these beat-down Ravens on a 3 game slide) with a winning record.

Their record in those games? 1-3.

Frauds.

So they are basically the 2010 Chiefs. Nice.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Lots of teams win a single playoff game, even with shit QBs.

This team was a 9-7 one-and-doner without Manning, now they're a SB contender.

No ****ing mystery at all.

The term "one and done" refers to a team that loses its first playoff game and is then out of the playoffs after one game. Being a Chiefs fan, I'm sure you're familiar with the situation.

That term does not apply to the 2011 Broncos, as they won a playoff game and played in two playoff games. You could say they were two and done, but that would be stupid.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

The term "one and done" refers to a team that loses its first playoff game and is then out of the playoffs after one game. Being a Chiefs fan, I'm sure you're familiar with the situation.

That term does not apply to the 2011 Broncos, as they won a playoff game and played in two playoff games. You could say they were two and done, but that would be stupid.

I wasn't referring to last year's team as a 1-and-done team.

They would have been without Tebow.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I wasn't referring to last year's team as a 1-and-done team.

They would have been without Tebow.

Aha, I see.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by Chief Gump

So they are basically the 2010 Chiefs. Nice.

Hardly. They have a HOF QB. Have one of those and once you're in ANYTHNG can happen.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Further, Baltimore was the first team with a winning record that Dungver has played in 10 weeks - and that defense is in shambles. Broken down Suggs, no Ray Lewis, Dannell Ellerbe, Bernard Pollard, Jameel McClain.

They finish the season against Cleveland & KC.

In fact - all season Dungver will have only played 4 teams (including these beat-down Ravens on a 3 game slide) with a winning record.

Their record in those games? 1-3.

Frauds.

The Patriots have also only played 4 teams with winning records. They are 2-2 in those games.

[Garcia Bronco]

Cause we're the best around...only 2 to 3 teams can take us down.

[Cassel>Manning]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

The Patriots have also only played 4 teams with winning records. They are 2-2 in those games.

Nice.